Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
mBio ; 8(5)2017 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066546

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have shown that animal nutrition is tightly linked to gut microbiota, especially under nutritional stress. In Drosophila melanogaster, microbiota are known to promote juvenile growth, development, and survival on poor diets, mainly through enhanced digestion leading to changes in hormonal signaling. Here, we show that this reliance on microbiota is greatly reduced in replicated Drosophila populations that became genetically adapted to a poor larval diet in the course of over 170 generations of experimental evolution. Protein and polysaccharide digestion in these poor-diet-adapted populations became much less dependent on colonization with microbiota. This was accompanied by changes in expression levels of dFOXO transcription factor, a key regulator of cell growth and survival, and many of its targets. These evolutionary changes in the expression of dFOXO targets to a large degree mimic the response of the same genes to microbiota, suggesting that the evolutionary adaptation to poor diet acted on mechanisms that normally mediate the response to microbiota. Our study suggests that some metazoans have retained the evolutionary potential to adapt their physiology such that association with microbiota may become optional rather than essential.IMPORTANCE Animals depend on gut microbiota for various metabolic tasks, particularly under conditions of nutritional stress, a relationship usually regarded as an inherent aspect of animal physiology. Here, we use experimental evolution in fly populations to show that the degree of host dependence on microbiota can substantially and rapidly change as the host population evolves in response to poor diet. Our results suggest that, although microbiota may initially greatly facilitate coping with suboptimal diets, chronic nutritional stress experienced over multiple generations leads to evolutionary adaptation in physiology and gut digestive properties that reduces dependence on the microbiota for growth and survival. Thus, despite its ancient evolutionary history, the reliance of animal hosts on their microbial partners can be surprisingly flexible and may be relaxed by short-term evolution.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Animals , Digestion , Directed Molecular Evolution , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation , Larva/physiology , Phenotype , Signal Transduction , Stress, Physiological , Transcription Factors
2.
Ecol Lett ; 18(10): 1078-86, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26249109

ABSTRACT

The animal gut plays a central role in tackling two common ecological challenges, nutrient shortage and food-borne parasites, the former by efficient digestion and nutrient absorption, the latter by acting as an immune organ and a barrier. It remains unknown whether these functions can be independently optimised by evolution, or whether they interfere with each other. We report that Drosophila melanogaster populations adapted during 160 generations of experimental evolution to chronic larval malnutrition became more susceptible to intestinal infection with the opportunistic bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila. However, they do not show suppressed immune response or higher bacterial loads. Rather, their increased susceptibility to P. entomophila is largely mediated by an elevated predisposition to loss of intestinal barrier integrity upon infection. These results may reflect a trade-off between the efficiency of nutrient extraction from poor food and the protective function of the gut, in particular its tolerance to pathogen-induced damage.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Disease Susceptibility , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Intestines/physiology , Malnutrition , Animals , Bacterial Load , Biological Evolution , Drosophila melanogaster/immunology , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Intestines/microbiology , Larva/physiology , Pseudomonas
3.
PLoS One ; 10(2): e0117280, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25671711

ABSTRACT

Structures built by animals are a widespread and ecologically important 'extended phenotype'. While its taxonomic diversity has been well described, factors affecting short-term evolution of building behavior within a species have received little experimental attention. Here we describe how, given the opportunity, wandering Drosophila melanogaster larvae often build long tunnels in agar substrates and embed their pupae within them. These embedded larvae are characterized by a longer egg-to-pupariation developmental time than larvae that pupate on the surface. Assuming that such building behaviors are likely to be energetically costly and/or time consuming, we hypothesized that they should evolve to be less pronounced under resource or time limitation. In accord with this prediction, larvae from populations evolved for 160 generations under a regime that combines larval malnutrition with limited developmental time dug shorter tunnels than larvae from control unselected populations. However, the proportion of larvae that embedded before pupation did not differ between the malnutrition-adapted and control populations, suggesting that tunnel length and likelihood of embedding before pupation are controlled by different genetic loci. The behaviors exhibited by wandering larvae of Drosophila melanogaster prior to pupation offer a model system to study evolution of animal building behaviors because the tunneling and embedding phenotypes are simple, facultative and highly variable.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal , Biological Evolution , Drosophila melanogaster , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Food Supply , Larva/growth & development , Pupa/growth & development , Selection, Genetic , Time Factors
4.
Brain Behav Immun ; 41: 152-61, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24863366

ABSTRACT

Virulent infections are expected to impair learning ability, either as a direct consequence of stressed physiological state or as an adaptive response that minimizes diversion of energy from immune defense. This prediction has been well supported for mammals and bees. Here, we report an opposite result in Drosophila melanogaster. Using an odor-mechanical shock conditioning paradigm, we found that intestinal infection with bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas entomophila or Erwinia c. carotovora improved flies' learning performance after a 1h retention interval. Infection with P. entomophila (but not E. c. carotovora) also improved learning performance after 5 min retention. No effect on learning performance was detected for intestinal infections with an avirulent GacA mutant of P. entomophila or for virulent systemic (hemocoel) infection with E. c. carotovora. Assays of unconditioned responses to odorants and shock do not support a major role for changes in general responsiveness to stimuli in explaining the changes in learning performance, although differences in their specific salience for learning cannot be excluded. Our results demonstrate that the effects of pathogens on learning performance in insects are less predictable than suggested by previous studies, and support the notion that immune stress can sometimes boost cognitive abilities.


Subject(s)
Avoidance Learning/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Pectobacterium carotovorum , Pseudomonas , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/physiology , Conditioning, Classical , Drosophila Proteins/biosynthesis , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/immunology , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Intestines/microbiology , Learning/physiology , Locomotion , Odorants , Pseudomonas/genetics , Pseudomonas/pathogenicity , Retention, Psychology/physiology , Stress, Mechanical , Virulence/genetics
5.
Biol Lett ; 10(3): 20140048, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24598110

ABSTRACT

While learning to avoid toxic food is common in mammals and occurs in some insects, learning to avoid cues associated with infectious pathogens has received little attention. We demonstrate that Drosophila melanogaster show olfactory learning in response to infection with their virulent intestinal pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila. This pathogen was not aversive to taste when added to food. Nonetheless, flies exposed for 3 h to food laced with P. entomophila, and scented with an odorant, became subsequently less likely to choose this odorant than flies exposed to pathogen-laced food scented with another odorant. No such effect occurred after an otherwise identical treatment with an avirulent mutant of P. entomophila, indicating that the response is mediated by pathogen virulence. These results demonstrate that a virulent pathogen infection can act as an aversive unconditioned stimulus which flies can associate with food odours, and thus become less attracted to pathogen-contaminated food.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/microbiology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Pseudomonas/physiology , Animals , Conditioning, Psychological , Cues , Female , Olfactory Perception , Pseudomonas/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...