A randomized prospective study of laser ablation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of laser ablation of the prostate, one of the minimally invasive treatments available for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: A prospective randomized study of 100 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, with 50 patients in each treatment arm, was conducted. All patients met the entry criteria: age older than 45 years, no history of carcinoma of the prostate, a peak flow rate less than 15 mL/s, medical therapy failure, and the ability to undergo regional or general anesthesia. All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation consisting of the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, uroflowmetry, pressure-flow study, transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume, and serum prostate-specific antigen determination. Patients underwent either TURP or laser ablation of the prostate using the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP)/neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Patients were seen for follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The mean age was 68.2 years (range 45 to 90) for the laser group and 67.4 years (range 54 to 82) for the TURP group. The mean AUA symptom score was 22 for the laser group and 21 for the TURP group. The mean peak uroflow rate was 7.6 +/- 3.4 mL/s for the laser group and 6.5 +/- 4.0 mL/s for the TURP group. At 12 months of follow-up, the mean AUA symptom score had decreased to 7 (-69.5%) for the laser group and to 3 (-80.9%) for the TURP group. The mean peak uroflow rate increased to 15.4 mL/s (+ 107.8%) for the laser group and to 16.7 mL/s (+ 150.7%) for the TURP cohort. Seventy-five percent of the laser group had a 50% or greater decrease in their individual AUA symptom score compared with 93% of the TURP group. Sixty-five percent of the laser cohort had a 50% or greater increase in their peak uroflow rate compared with 75% of the TURP cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Laser prostatectomy produced improvements in the peak flow rate and symptom score similar to those produced by TURP. The patients who underwent laser treatment required a longer period to reach maximum improvement, which probably reflects the lack of tissue debulking at the time of surgery. Further improvement in laser technology will be required to produce more immediate results.

Prostate cancer detection in candidates for open prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We determine the incidence of biopsy detectable prostate cancer in men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) elevation who are candidates for open prostatectomy, and the histology of prostatic tissue of men who underwent surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sextant peripheral zone prostate biopsies were performed in 128 consecutive men with obstructive voiding symptoms who had digital rectal examination not suspicious for cancer, PSA greater than 4.0 ng./ml. and prostate volume 75 ml. or greater. Of the patients 59 also underwent transition zone biopsy. Median PSA was 9.9 ng./ml. (range 4.1 to 80.0), median prostate volume was 92 ml. (range 75 to 220), median PSA density was 0.10 ng./ml./ml. (range 0.03 to 0.80) and median percent free PSA in 43 patients was 23.6 (range 8.8 to 41.3). RESULTS: Of the 128 patients 16 (13%) had malignant biopsy including 1 who had cancer detected with transition zone biopsy only. Gleason score of tumors ranged from 4 to 8 (median 5). Of 57 patients who underwent prostatectomy 6 (11%) had stage T1a and 2 (4%) had stage T1b cancer. Among men without an indwelling urethral catheter due to acute urinary retention mean PSA, PSA density and percent free PSA were not significantly different in those with benign and malignant biopsies and/or prostatectomy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 10% of men with PSA elevation who are potential candidates for open prostatectomy will have biopsy detectable prostate cancer. This diagnostic yield, while lower than that reported for unselect men with normal digital rectal examination and PSA elevation, may justify preoperative peripheral zone biopsy to avoid surgical misadventure during open enucleation. Among patients with benign peripheral zone biopsy there is a less than 5% prevalence of large volume tumors that may complicate open enucleation.

A randomized prospective study of transurethral electrovaporization vs laser ablation of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized study comparing transurethral electrovaporization (TVP) vs laser ablation of the prostate was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of the procedures. METHODS: A total of 31 patients underwent treatment, with 20 patients receiving electrovaporization surgery and 11 patients undergoing laser treatment. Patients underwent initial evaluation consisting of an American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, prostate specific antigen (PSA), uroflowometry, pressure flow, and transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume. Patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with a 2:1 randomization of TVP to laser treatment were enrolled. The laser patients had a mean pre-operative AUA symptom score of 19.0 and scores of 9.0, 6.0 and 5.0 at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up. The TVP patients had a mean pre-operative symptom score of 22.0 and scores of 7.0, 8.0 and 5.0 at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up. Mean peak uroflow (PF) rate pre-operative was 10.7 for the laser group and 7.7 for the TVP group. At 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, mean PF rates of 13.3, 17.6 and 16.5 were present for the laser patients and 15.0, 17.5 and 14.2 for the TVP group. The differences were not statistically significant. There were 6 complications in the laser patients and 7 complications in the TVP group. Operative time was a mean of 27 min for the laser patients and 46 min for the TVP group, and the difference in operative time was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: At 6-month follow-up the improvement in symptoms score and peak flow rate are comparable in both treatment groups. The electrovaporization procedure required significantly longer to perform than the laser procedure. Long-term follow-up is required to see if these results remain sustainable for electrovaporization therapy.

Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury.

PURPOSE: Testicular torsion is a urologic emergency representing a form of ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury that requires prompt care to achieve tissue salvage and a reduction in post-torsion morbidity. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) has shown benefits in previous musculoskeletal models of IR. We evaluated the efficacy of HBO treatment in a rat testicular torsion model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of male Wistar rats were included in this study: 1) Sham (n=16), spermatic cords exposed but not occluded; 2) Control (n=16), 4 hours of bilateral spermatic cord occlusion; 3) HBO during ischemia (n=18), 4 hours of occlusion and administration of HBO during the last 90 minutes of ischemia; and 4) HBO on reperfusion (n=8), HBO administered immediately upon reperfusion of the testes. The animals were sacrificed at two weeks and architecture and germinal epithelial cell thickness were determined by histological examination on each testicle. Average thickness (in cell layers) of each group was compared with control using Student's t test. RESULTS: Control testicles showed a significant reduction in germinal cell thickness compared with sham (1.7 versus 6.3, p <0.05). The animals treated with HBO during ischemia showed a significant increase in epithelial cell thickness compared with control (2.8 versus 1.7, p <0.05). Hyperbaric oxygen treatment during reperfusion had the greatest beneficial effect compared with control (5.1 versus 1.7, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive HBO therapy administered during ischemia or reperfusion significantly reduced injury to the testicle in this animal model. These results suggest a potential benefit of HBO treatment in clinical situations of testicular torsion.

Early results of a prospective study of hormone therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced prostate carcinoma is usually not curable with surgery or radiation therapy. Primary hormone therapy is an alternative therapeutic option, but contemporary prospective studies of the outcomes of such therapy are not available. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, hospital-based study of gonadal androgen ablation with deferred antiandrogen therapy in 103 men with prostate carcinoma clinically classified as T3-4NXM0. The median potential follow-up was 51 months (range, 36-74 months), and the median period of observation was 43 months (range, 6-74 months). RESULTS: Each patient experienced regression of the primary tumor, and none experienced significant morbidity from the primary tumor during the study period. The projected 5-year cause specific, metastasis free, PSA disease free (no PSA elevation > 1.0 ng/mL after the beginning of antiandrogen therapy), and all-cause survival rates were 84%, 84%, 68%, and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Primary hormone therapy is a reasonable treatment option for locally advanced prostate carcinoma in elderly men or in men with significant comorbid disease who request therapeutic intervention.

Trends in diagnosis of stage T1a-b prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Stage T1a-b prostate cancer comprised about 44% of newly diagnosed local prostate cancer cases in the United States before the advent of medical and minimally invasive treatments for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and before the widespread use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in men with BPH. Information about the impact of these advances on detection of T1a-b cancer is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prevalence of T1a-b prostate cancer was determined in 1,554 consecutive men who underwent surgical prostatectomy for suspected BPH at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 1985 through 1996. Since 1991 a PSA blood test was obtained routinely before surgery and patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng./ml. usually underwent ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. RESULTS: The number of T1a-b cancer cases was relatively stable during 1985 to 1990 but declined from 36 in 1990 to 9 in 1996. There were no temporal trends in proportion of prostatectomy patients with T1a-b cancer and the decline in cancer detection paralleled less frequent use of surgical prostatectomy for treatment of BPH. The proportion of prostatectomy patients with T1a-b cancer was similar in 1985 to 1990 and in 1991 to 1996 but the percentage of Gleason 7 to 10 cancers declined from 26 in 1985 to 1990 to 10 in 1991 to 1996 (p < 0.0001). PSA and PSA density of evaluable patients with cancer were significantly greater than in evaluable patients with BPH. Of 105 patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng./ml. who underwent preoperative prostate biopsy 16 (15%) had T1a-b cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The less frequent use of surgical prostatectomy at our institution has produced marked decline in detection of T1a-b cancer. If representative of national trends this experience suggests that many men with obstructive voiding symptoms and T1a-b cancer will remain undiagnosed and that periodic monitoring to identify unsuspected cancer is important in men who are treated with medical or minimally invasive therapies for BPH. Decline in detection of T1a-b cancer may also confound the accuracy of projected incidence rates of local prostate cancer in the United States.