Fixed ratio dosing of pramlintide with regular insulin before a standard meal in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Amylin is co-secreted with insulin and is therefore lacking in patients with type 1 diabetes. Replacement with fixed ratio co-administration of insulin and the amylin analogue pramlintide may be superior to separate dosing. This concept was evaluated in a ratio-finding study. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in a randomized, single-masked, standard breakfast crossover study using regular human insulin injected simultaneously with pramlintide 6, 9 or 12 mcg/unit insulin or placebo. Insulin dosage was reduced by 30% from patients' usual estimates. Plasma glucose, glucagon and pramlintide and adverse events were assessed. All ratios reduced 0-3-h glucose and glucagon increments by >50%. No hypoglycaemia occurred. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild. All pramlintide/insulin ratios markedly and safely reduced glycaemic excursions and suppressed glucagon secretion in the immediate postprandial state. Further study using one of these ratios to explore the efficacy and safety of longer-term meal-time and basal hormone replacement is warranted.

Pharmacometrics and the transition to model-based development.

As the transition to model-based drug development continues, pharmacometric analysis will have an increasingly important role across the entire life cycle of drug discovery, development, regulatory approval, and commercialization. For this reason, pharmacometrics can--and should--have an integrating function in the transformation to model-based development. This essay describes an approach for formalizing the pharmacometrics process using the disciplines encompassed by enterprise engineering.

The effect of pramlintide on hormonal, metabolic or symptomatic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, is a potential new adjunctive therapy to insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes and insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes. Early clinical trials have shown a transient increased risk of hypoglycaemia in some patients at the time of initiating pramlintide therapy. This may be the result of combining the postprandial glucose, lowering effect of pramlintide with the existing hypoglycaemic potential of insulin without appropriate adjustment of insulin doses. However, the possibility that pramlintide may exert an independent detrimental effect on the physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia needs to be excluded. METHODS: We conducted three separate randomized, placebo-controlled studies in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with adjunctive pramlintide. These studies utilized pramlintide at high doses (either 0.1-1 mg pramlintide daily or 0.1-0.8 mg pramlintide four times a day for 5 or 6 days) as well as doses closer to those anticipated for therapeutic usage (30, 100 or 300 microg three times daily for 14 days), and examined the hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to an insulin-infusion hypoglycaemic challenge conducted at baseline and after days of therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Pramlintide had no effect on the counter-regulatory hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia. These findings demonstrated that pramlintide, when used as adjunctive therapy to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes, has no independent effect on the response to hypoglycaemia.

Adjunctive therapy with pramlintide lowers HbA1c without concomitant weight gain and increased risk of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes approaching glycemic targets.

AIMS: In long-term clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes spanning a wide range of HbA1c, addition of pramlintide to existing insulin regimens led to reductions in HbA1c that were accompanied by weight loss and no increase in overall severe hypoglycemia event rates. Given that weight gain and increased hypoglycemia risk contribute to the difficulty of attaining HbA1c targets (<7 %), the question arose whether pramlintide could benefit patients approaching, but not reaching glycemic targets with insulin alone. To address this question, we conducted a pooled analysis from 3 long-term clinical trials, including all patients with an entry HbA1c between 7.0 % and 8.5 %. METHODS: Within the subset of patients with an entry HbA1c between 7.0 % and 8.5 % (approximately 28 % of all patients enrolled in the 3 studies), 196 were treated with placebo + insulin (baseline HbA1c 7.9+/-0.4 %, body weight 76.0+/-14.3 kg [mean+/-SD]) and 281 with pramlintide+insulin (baseline HbA1c 7.9+/-0.4 %, body weight 75.4+/-13.1 kg). Endpoints included placebo-corrected changes from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c, body weight, and the event rate of severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Adjunctive therapy with pramlintide resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c and body weight from baseline to week 26 (0.3 % and 1.8 kg, placebo-corrected treatment differences, respectively, both p

Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves long-term glycaemic and weight control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year, randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta-cells in Type 1 diabetes mellitus renders patients deficient in two glucoregulatory peptide hormones, insulin and amylin. With insulin replacement alone, most patients do not achieve glycaemic goals. We aimed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy with pramlintide, a synthetic human amylin analogue, in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study, 651 patients with Type 1 diabetes (age 41 +/- 13 years, HbA(1c) 8.9 +/- 1.0%, mean +/- sd) were randomized to mealtime injections of placebo or varying doses of pramlintide, in addition to their insulin therapy, for 52 weeks. RESULTS: Addition of pramlintide [60 microg three times daily (TID) or four times daily (QID)] to insulin led to significant reductions in HbA(1c) from baseline to Week 52 of 0.29% (P < 0.011) and 0.34% (P < 0.001), respectively, compared with a 0.04% reduction in placebo group. Three times the proportion of pramlintide- than placebo-treated patients achieved an HbA(1c) of < 7%. The greater reduction in HbA(1c) with pramlintide was achieved without an increase in concomitant insulin use and was accompanied by a significant reduction in body weight from baseline to Week 52 of 0.4 kg in the 60 microg TID (P < 0.027) or QID (P < 0.040) pramlintide treatment groups, compared with a 0.8-kg gain in body weight in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in pramlintide-treated patients was transient, mild-to-moderate nausea. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that mealtime amylin replacement with pramlintide, as an adjunct to insulin therapy, improves long-term glycaemic and weight control in patients with Type 1 diabetes.

The human amylin analog, pramlintide, reduces postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Amylin is a second beta-cell hormone that is normally co-secreted with insulin in response to meals; it complements the effects of insulin in postprandial glucose control, in part by suppressing glucagon secretion. In patients with type 2 diabetes, mealtime administration of the human amylin analog pramlintide markedly improves postprandial glucose excursions. The aim of this study was to examine whether pramlintide reduces the postprandial hyperglucagonemia that is often seen in this patient population. METHODS: Utilizing a single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, 24 patients with type 2 diabetes, 12 insulin-treated and 12 non-insulin-treated, underwent a standardized mixed meal test on 2 occasions during which they received, in randomized order, a five-hour intravenous infusion of placebo or pramlintide (100 microg/h). RESULTS: During the placebo infusion, plasma glucose and plasma glucagon concentrations increased substantially after the meal. During the pramlintide infusion, postprandial plasma glucose and plasma glucagon responses were significantly (p < 0.05, all) reduced following ingestion of the same meal, both in the insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated subgroups. CONCLUSION: Supplementation of mealtime amylin with pramlintide reduces postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, a mechanism that likely contributes to pramlintide's postprandial glucose-lowering effect.

The human amylin analog, pramlintide, corrects postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Mealtime amylin replacement with the human amylin analog pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy improves postprandial glycemia and long-term glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Preclinical animal studies indicate that these complementary effects may result from at least 2 independent mechanisms: a slowing of nutrient delivery to the small intestine and a suppression of nutrient-stimulated glucagon secretion. The former effect of pramlintide has previously been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present studies characterize the effect of pramlintide on postprandial glucagon secretion in this patient population. Plasma glucagon and glucose concentrations were measured before and after a standardized liquid meal in 2 separate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of pramlintide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes. In a 2-day crossover study, 18 patients received a 5-hour intravenous infusion of pramlintide (25 microg/h or 50 microg/h) or placebo in addition to subcutaneous (SC) insulin injections. In a 14-day parallel-group study, 84 patients received SC injections of 30, 100, or 300 microg of pramlintide or placebo 3 times daily in addition to SC injections of insulin. In both studies plasma glucagon concentrations increased in response to the meal in the placebo-plus-insulin group but not in any of the pramlintide-treated groups (all pramlintide treatment arms v placebo, P <.05). We conclude that mealtime amylin replacement with pramlintide prevents the abnormal meal-related rise in glucagonemia in insulin-treated patients with type 1 diabetes, an effect that likely contributes to its ability to improve postprandial glucose homeostasis and long-term glycemic control.

Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a physiological approach toward improved metabolic control.

Destruction and dysfunction of pancreatic beta-cells, resulting in absolute and relative insulin deficiency, represent key abnormalities in the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. Following the discovery of amylin, a second beta-cell hormone that is co-secreted with insulin in response to nutrient stimuli, it was realized that diabetes represents a state of bihormonal beta cell deficiency and that lack of amylin action may contribute to abnormal glucose homeostasis. Experimental studies show that amylin acts as a neuroendocrine hormone that complements the effects of insulin in postprandial glucose regulation through several centrally mediated effects. These include a suppression of postprandial glucagon secretion and a vagus-mediated regulation of gastric emptying, thereby helping to control the influx of endogenous and exogenous glucose, respectively. In animal studies, amylin has also been shown to reduce food intake and body weight, consistent with an additional satiety effect. Pramlintide is a soluble, non-aggregating, injectable, synthetic analog of human amylin currently under development for the treatment of type 1 and insulin-using type 2 diabetes. Long-term clinical studies have consistently demonstrated that pre-prandial s.c. injections of pramlintide, in addition to the current insulin regimen, reduce HbA(1c) and body weight in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, without an increase in insulin use or in the event rate of severe hypoglycemia. The most commonly observed side effects were gastrointestinal-related, mainly mild nausea, which typically occurred upon initiation of treatment and resolved within days or weeks. Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin therapy is a novel physiological approach toward improved long-term glycemic and weight control in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of human amylin, improves the metabolic profile of patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. The Pramlintide in Type 2 Diabetes Group.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of 4 weeks of subcutaneous administration of pramlintide, a synthetic analog of human amylin, on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum fructosamine, HbA1c, and fasting plasma lipids were measured in 203 patients in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group multicenter trial using doses of 30 micrograms q.i.d., 60 micrograms t.i.d., and 60 micrograms q.i.d. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in serum fructosamine concentrations were observed in the pramlintide 30 micrograms q.i.d. group (17.5 +/- 4.9 mumol/l, P = 0.029), the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (24.1 +/- 4.9 mumol/l, P = 0.003), and the 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (22.6 +/- 4.1 mumol/l, P = 0.001) compared with the placebo group (3.5 +/- 3.8 mumol/l). There were also statistically significant shifts in the proportion of patients with an abnormal serum fructosamine concentration at baseline that normalized at week 4 within the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group and the 60 micrograms q.i.d. group. Consistent with the fructosamine results, there were statistically significant reductions in HbA1c in the pramlintide 30 micrograms q.i.d. group (0.53 +/- 0.07%, P = 0.0447), the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (0.58 +/- 0.07%, P < 0.0217), and the pramlintide 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (0.51 +/- 0.08%, P = 0.0242) compared with the placebo group (0.27 +/- 0.08%). Total cholesterol concentrations were also statistically significantly reduced in both the pramlintide 60 micrograms t.i.d. group (8.4 mg/dl, P < 0.01) and 60 micrograms q.i.d. group (10.5 mg/dl, P < 0.01) compared with placebo (1.2 mg/dl). Body weight decreased in both of the pramlintide 60 micrograms groups, but the trend did not achieve statistical significance. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in serum fructosamine, plasma total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, and HbA1c support the hypothesis that pramlintide may improve metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin.

Effects of 4 weeks' administration of pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, on glycaemia control in patients with IDDM: effects on plasma glucose profiles and serum fructosamine concentrations.

The effects of 4 weeks' administration of pramlintide, an analogue of the human hormone amylin, on blood glucose control in 215 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were examined in a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Pramlintide was administered subcutaneously prior to meals in four dosing regimens: 30 microg four times per day (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening snack), 30 microg three times per day (breakfast, lunch and dinner [BLD]), 30 microg three times per day (breakfast, dinner and evening snack [BDS]), and 60 microg twice per day (breakfast and dinner). After 4 weeks of pramlintide 30 microg four times per day administration, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mean 24 h plasma glucose concentration when compared to placebo (-1.4 +/- 0.5 vs 0.3 +/- 0.5 micromol/l, p = 0.009). Serum fructosamine concentrations were reduced 62 +/- 10 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 mg four times per day group, 43 +/- 7 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 microg three times per day (BLD) group, 47 +/- 6 micromol/l in the pramlintide 30 microg three times per day (BDS) group, 46 +/- 7 micromol/l in the pramlintide 60 microg twice per day group, and 29 +/- 8 micromol/l by placebo. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was not different in any pramlintide group compared to the placebo group. Nausea, the most frequent adverse event, subsided after the first week of treatment in the majority of patients. In conclusion, pramlintide improved blood glucose control over a 4-week period without increased hypoglycaemia and was well tolerated. Future studies using a longer period of pramlintide administration with assessment of HbA1c as the measurement of glycaemic control are warranted.

Pramlintide: a human amylin analogue reduced postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes.

In order to determine the influence of a 5 h infusion of pramlintide compared to placebo on postprandial glucose, lactate, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations in patients with Type 2 diabetes, a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study was conducted in 24 patients; 12 treated with exogenous insulin and 12 managed with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents. One hour after initiation of infusion, patients consumed a Sustacal test meal. The protocol was repeated on the following day with each patient receiving the alternate study medication. Pramlintide infusion in the insulin-treated patients resulted in statistically significant reductions in mean glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and lactate concentrations during the 4-h period after the Sustacal test meal. Pramlintide infusion also resulted in significant reductions of mean insulin, C-peptide, and lactate concentrations, but not glucose concentrations, in the patients treated with diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents. Within this latter group, reduction in postprandial glucose concentrations in individual patients correlated with glycated haemoglobin values. These results suggest that administration of pramlintide may improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin or poorly controlled on diet and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents.

Amylin and glycaemic regulation: a possible role for the human amylin analogue pramlintide.

Clinical studies with the human amylin analogue, pramlintide, suggest that it may help to improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus using insulin. This has been demonstrated by reductions in postprandial glycaemic excursion, 24-h glucose profile and serum fructosamine concentrations following administration of pramlintide for periods of up to 28 days in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Additionally, preliminary studies with pramlintide in patients with Type 2 diabetes using insulin have indicated its ability to reduce postprandial hyperglycaemia in this population. Thus, this data set suggests a potential role for pramlintide as a partner to insulin for the optimization of glycaemic control in patients with diabetes using insulin.

Self-care behaviors in insulin-dependent diabetes: evaluative tools and their associations with glycemic control.

Clarified the relationships between self-care behaviors and illness-specific outcomes in approximately 270 youths with IDDM. Youths were assessed at three points in time using a semistructured interview measure and multiple indices of dietary intake and physical activity with two different methodologies (i.e., recalls, logs). Glycemic control was most strongly related to the semistructured Self-Care Adherence Interview (SCAI); and second to the overall quality of the youth's dietary intake. The SCAI also predicted glycemic control over time. Physical activity levels and specific nutritional components from the logs and recalls were generally unrelated to glycemic control.

Effect of 14 days' subcutaneous administration of the human amylin analogue, pramlintide (AC137), on an intravenous insulin challenge and response to a standard liquid meal in patients with IDDM.

Individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM or type 1 diabetes) are deficient in both insulin and amylin, peptides secreted by the beta cell. We have investigated the effects of amylin replacement therapy employing the human amylin analogue, pramlintide (25, 28, 29-pro-human amylin, previously referred to as AC137), upon the responses to a standardized insulin infusion (40 mU. kg-1. h-1) for 100 min and a liquid Sustacal meal (360 kcal) in 84 healthy IDDM patients. Following baseline evaluations, patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, 30, 100 or 300 micrograms pramlintide 30 min before meals for 14 days. There was no meaningful difference between adverse events reported by the 30-micrograms pramlintide and the placebo groups, but ten subjects withdrew due to nausea, eight of these in the 300-micrograms dose group. Peak plasma pramlintide concentrations for the 30-micrograms group were 21 +/- 3 and 29 +/- 5 pmol/l on Days 1 and 14, respectively. These values are similar to postprandial plasma amylin concentrations in normal volunteers. The plasma glucose, free insulin, glucagon, epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations during the insulin infusion test before and after therapy were identical in each of the group. Prior to pramlintide therapy, Sustacal ingestion produced a 4.0-4.8 mmol/l rise in plasma glucose concentrations in each of the groups. Pramlintide therapy reduced postprandial hyperglycaemia as reflected by the 3-h incremental AUCglucose (AUCglucose above or below fasting glucose concentration) Day 1 vs Day 14: 30 micrograms, 322 +/- 92 vs -38 +/- 161 mmol/l.min, p = 0.010; 100 micrograms, 317 +/- 92 vs -39 +/- 76 mmol/l.min, p = 0.001; and 300 micrograms, 268 +/- 96 vs -245 +/- 189 mmol/l.min, p = 0.077. Thus, pramlintide therapy with these regimens did not appear to impair either in vivo insulin action or the counter-regulatory response to hypoglycaemia but did show a clear effect of blunting postprandial hyperglycaemia following a standardized meal.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AC137 (25,28,29 tripro-amylin, human) after intravenous bolus and infusion doses in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.

A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of 30-mug, 100-mug, and 300-mug 2-minute bolus doses and 2-hour infusion doses of AC137 (25,28,29 tripro-amylin, human) on plasma AC137 concentrations and plasma glucose and lactate responses in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The study design was an imbedded two-way cross-over wherein patients received placebo and active boluses in one period and placebo and active infusions in the other period. Two patients in each dose group received placebo throughout the two periods. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) were determined during the 6-hour period after initiation of dosing. Data were fitted with a linked PK/PD model. Pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied, and attenuation of glucose and lactate responses to a mixed meal was dose and concentration dependent. The results of the PK/PD model indicate that the attenuation of glucose and lactate responses was greater after AC137 infusion doses than after the same doses given as a bolus. Glucose and lactate responses to a mixed meal were essentially negated by the 300-mug infusion dose.

Empirical validation for a family-centered model of care.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether family relations and family-life stress predict adherence behaviors and metabolic control in youths by testing a theoretically- and empirically-based model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: HbA1c levels of 157 youths 12-20 years of age with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were evaluated, along with treatment adherence and psychosocial family data based on interviews and self-reports. A family-centered model for IDDM care was analyzed with the EQS structural modeling statistical program. An additional exploratory model including HbA1c levels 6 months earlier was also tested. RESULTS: Positive family relations (high family cohesion and low family conflict), especially during the first years of illness, indirectly related to good metabolic control through positive adherence behaviors. High levels of family-life stress related to worse metabolic control directly, and also indirectly via poor family relations, which in turn related to poor adherence to treatment. Longer illness duration related indirectly to metabolic control via adherence to treatment. Longer illness duration also related to maternal perceptions of higher family-life stress. Older youths perceived more family-life stress as well. The older age of the youths related indirectly to poor metabolic control through its association with poor adherence behaviors and less cohesive and more conflictual family relations. Results were consistent when earlier levels of metabolic control were included in the model, except that the direct relationship between family-life stress and metabolic control became nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a family-centered approach to diabetes care that facilitates positive family functioning and leads to lower levels of family-life stress may be useful in promoting optimal health outcomes.

Low-carbohydrate diet alters intracellular glucose metabolism but not overall glucose disposal in exercise-trained subjects.

Dietary composition has been strongly implicated as an important determinant of in vivo insulin sensitivity. However, the metabolic alterations associated with extreme changes in diet have not been well described. We compared glucose metabolism after a standard diet ([STD] 35% fat, 51% carbohydrate, and 14% protein) with the effects of a 3-week adaptation to a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet ([LCD] 75% fat, 8% carbohydrate, and 17% protein). Ten healthy men were studied using the euglycemic clamp technique, indirect calorimetry, and percutaneous vastus lateralis muscle biopsies for analysis of glycogen synthase (GS) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activities in the basal and insulin-stimulated states. Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was unchanged (STD 46.1 +/- 4.3 v LCD 46.0 +/- 4.3 mumol/kg.min, P = NS), but marked alterations in the routes of glucose disposal were noted. Insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation (Gox) was markedly reduced following LCD (STD 18.6 +/- 1.9 v LCD 8.23 +/- 1.9 mumol/kg.min, P = .0001), and nonoxidative glucose metabolism (Gnox) was enhanced by LCD (STD 24.9 +/- 0.9 v LCD 38.9 +/- 4.3 mumol/kg.min, P = .03). Following LCD, both the total and active forms of PDH (PDHt and PDHa) were significantly depressed. After LCD, GS activates (FV0.1, %I, and A0.5) were unaffected in the basal state, but were greater than for STD (P = .004) after insulin stimulation. The apparent increase in the sensitivity of GS to activation by insulin following LCD correlated strongly with maximal O2 consumption ([VO2max] r = .97, P = .001), suggesting that physical conditioning interacted with the metabolic impact of LCD. In summary, LCD did not induce changes in net glucose disposal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with IDDM by intravenous infusion of AC137, a human amylin analogue.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that intravenous administration of AC137 (25,28,29 tripro-human amylin), a human amylin analogue, modulates the rate of appearance of glucose derived from a standard oral meal in the peripheral circulation of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After the observation that a 2-h infusion of AC137 at a rate of 150 micrograms/h, in conjunction with the subjects' usual morning insulin dose, decreased postprandial hyperglycemia in 6 subjects with IDDM, a double-blind placebo-controlled two-period crossover design in an additional 18 IDDM patients was undertaken to confirm and extend the observation. Based on reasoning that an effect to modulate the appearance of orally administered glucose would have no impact on the disposition of an intravenous glucose load, nine patients were challenged with an intravenous glucose loads (300 mg/kg), while another nine patients were challenged with a standardized Sustacal meal (350 kcal) during a 5-h infusion of AC137 (50 micrograms/h). On each occasion, the subjects received their usual morning doses of insulin subcutaneously. The impact of the AC137 infusion on the plasma glucose responses to these different challenges was assessed. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of AC137 yielding steady state plasma concentrations of 225 +/- 15 pmol/l (mean +/- SE) reduced postprandial plasma glucose concentrations after the standardized Sustacal meal challenge. The mean area under the glucose curve, corrected for baseline, was reduced from -1,869 +/- 5,562 mg.dl-1.min during placebo infusion to -28,872 +/- 4,812 mg.dl-1.min during AC137 infusion, P = 0.0015. In contrast, an AC137 infusion producing steady-state concentrations of 234 +/- 16 pmol/l had no effect on the plasma glucose profile after administration of an intravenous glucose load. CONCLUSIONS: AC137 administration, in these patients with IDDM, reduced postprandial hyperglycemia apparently by affecting the delivery rate of glucose from the gastrointestinal tract. AC137 may prove to be a clinically useful addition to insulin regimens to facilitate the achievement of glycemic control.

Glyburide in non-insulin-dependent diabetes: an update.

Recent data suggest that non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) may evolve in genetically predisposed individuals beginning with impaired peripheral glucose metabolism followed by insulin deficiency. Glyburide is an effective, long-acting, second-generation oral sulfonylurea introduced in the United States in 1984. In comparison with the first-generation sulfonylureas, glyburide is at least as effective, has a lower incidence of side effects, and may enhance postreceptor insulin activity to a greater degree. Glyburide can improve glycemic control, as evidenced by reduced fasting blood glucose concentrations and glycohemoglobin levels, without the inconvenience of insulin injections, the higher plasma insulin concentrations, and the additional training required to administer insulin. Because of its ability to enhance target tissue insulin action, glyburide also improves glycemic control in many NIDDM patients who have previously failed therapy with other sulfonylurea agents. Gluburide, as adjunctive therapy, may reduce the daily dosage needed by those who require insulin. Favorable pharmacokinetics and high inherent potency of glyburide often allow effective therapy when the drug is administered once a day.