Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Health Forum ; 4(11): e234974, 2023 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032678

ABSTRACT

This JAMA Forum discusses disparities and food insecurity among underserved populations in the US, the actions being taken by states, tribal actions, and additional steps to ensure food and nutrition security.

2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 42(4): 470-478, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37011311

ABSTRACT

Medicare is a primary source of health insurance coverage for several million people younger than age sixty-five who have long-term disabilities. This analysis compared measures of access to care, cost concerns, and satisfaction with care for beneficiaries younger than age sixty-five versus those ages sixty-five and older, using the 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. We also compared beneficiaries in traditional Medicare with those in Medicare Advantage, given that a growing share of younger beneficiaries with disabilities are enrolled in private plans. We found that Medicare beneficiaries younger than age sixty-five reported worse access to care, more cost concerns, and lower satisfaction with care than beneficiaries ages sixty-five and older, regardless of their type of Medicare coverage. Among beneficiaries younger than age sixty-five in traditional Medicare, the share reporting cost concerns was highest among those without supplemental coverage. All of these differences were statistically significant. Addressing gaps in coverage for people with disabilities could improve experiences for this often-overlooked segment of the Medicare population.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Medicare Part C , Humans , Aged , United States , Cost Sharing , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Am J Prev Med ; 58(1): 69-78, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761517

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is the largest U.S. federally funded nutrition assistance program, providing food assistance to more than 40 million low-income Americans, half of whom are children. This paper examines trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among U.S. children and adolescents by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation status. METHODS: Dietary data from 15,645 participants (aged 2-19 years) were obtained from the 2003-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination surveys. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation was categorized as: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participant, income-eligible nonparticipant, lower income-ineligible nonparticipant, and higher income-ineligible nonparticipant. Survey-weighted logistic regressions estimated predicted probabilities of daily sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, and negative binomial regressions estimated predicted per capita daily consumption of sugar-sweetened beverage calories. Data were analyzed in 2019. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2014, there were significant declines across all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation categories for sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (participants: 84.2% to 75.6%, p=0.009; income-eligible nonparticipants: 85.8% to 67.5%, p=0.004; lower income-ineligible nonparticipants: 84.3% to 70.6%, p=0.026; higher income-ineligible nonparticipants: 82.2% to 67.7%, p=0.001) and per capita daily sugar-sweetened beverage calories (participants: 267 to 182 kilocalories, p<0.001; income-eligible nonparticipants: 269 to 168 kilocalories, p<0.001; lower income-ineligible nonparticipants: 249 to 178 kilocalories, p=0.008; higher income-ineligible nonparticipants: 244 to 161 kilocalories, p<0.001). Per capita sports/energy drink consumption increased among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants (2 to 15 kilocalories, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption has declined for children and adolescents in all Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation categories, but current levels remain high. There were fewer favorable trends over time for consumption of sugar-sweetened beverage subtypes among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants relative to other participant categories.


Subject(s)
Beverages/statistics & numerical data , Carbonated Beverages/statistics & numerical data , Food Assistance/statistics & numerical data , Poverty , Sweetening Agents , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , Nutritional Status , United States
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 56(6): 827-833, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005465

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Energy drinks refer to non-alcoholic beverages that contain caffeine, amino acids, herbs, and vitamins. Although energy drinks are marketed to reduce fatigue and improve physical/mental performance, frequent consumption of these beverages has been linked to negative health consequences. The purpose of this study is to provide timely, national estimates of the percentage of energy drink consumers in the U.S. and to analyze trends in energy drink intake between 2003 and 2016. METHODS: A total of 9,911 adolescents (aged 12-19 years); 12,103 young adults (aged 20-39 years); and 11,245 middle-aged adults (aged 40-59 years) were assessed using dietary data from the 2003-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. For each age group (adolescents, young adults, and middle-aged adults), logistic regression was used to estimate the proportion of energy drink consumers, and negative binomial regression was used to estimate per capita energy drink consumption, adjusting for covariates. Differences in total caffeine intake between energy drink consumers and non-consumers were examined by pooling all survey years together and using negative binomial regression. Analyses were conducted in 2018. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2016, the prevalence of energy drink consumption increased significantly for adolescents (0.2% to 1.4%, p=0.028); young adults (0.5% to 5.5%, p<0.001); and middle-aged adults (0.0% to 1.2%, p=0.006). Per capita consumption of energy drinks increased significantly from 2003 to 2016 only for young adults (1.1 to 9.7 calories, p<0.001). Pooled across years, energy drink consumers had significantly higher total caffeine intake compared with non-consumers for adolescents (227.0 mg vs 52.1 mg, p<0.001); young adults (278.7 mg vs 135.3 mg, p<0.001); and middle-aged adults (348.8 mg vs 219.0 mg, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that consumption of energy drinks has grown substantially and that these drinks are a major source of caffeine among those who consume them.


Subject(s)
Energy Drinks/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Racial Groups , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...