A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Testosterone Therapy in Women With Anorexia Nervosa.

CONTEXT: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric illness with considerable morbidity and no approved medical therapies. We have shown that relative androgen deficiency in AN is associated with greater depression and anxiety symptom severity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low-dose testosterone therapy is an effective endocrine-targeted therapy for AN. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety women, 18 to 45 years, with AN and free testosterone levels below the median for healthy women. INTERVENTION: Transdermal testosterone, 300 µg daily, or placebo patch for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point: body mass index (BMI). Secondary end points: depression symptom severity [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)], anxiety symptom severity [Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)], and eating disorder psychopathology and behaviors. RESULTS: Mean BMI increased by 0.0 ± 1.0 kg/m2 in the testosterone group and 0.5 ± 1.1 kg/m2 in the placebo group (P = 0.03) over 24 weeks. At 4 weeks, there was a trend toward a greater decrease in HAM-D score (P = 0.09) in the testosterone vs placebo group. At 24 weeks, mean HAM-D and HAM-A scores decreased similarly in both groups [HAM-D: -2.9 ± 4.9 (testosterone) vs -3.0 ± 5.0 (placebo), P = 0.72; HAM-A: -4.5 ± 5.3 (testosterone) vs -4.3 ± 4.4 (placebo), P = 0.25]. There were no significant differences in eating disorder scores between groups. Testosterone therapy was safe and well tolerated with no increase in androgenic side effects compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Low-dose testosterone therapy for 24 weeks was associated with less weight gain-and did not lead to sustained improvements in depression, anxiety, or disordered eating symptoms-compared with placebo in women with AN.

Vertebral Volumetric Bone Density and Strength Are Impaired in Women With Low-Weight and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa.

Context: Areal bone mineral density (BMD) is lower, particularly at the spine, in low-weight women with anorexia nervosa (AN). However, little is known about vertebral integral volumetric BMD (Int.vBMD) or vertebral strength across the AN weight spectrum, including "atypical" AN [body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 kg/m2]. Objective: To investigate Int.vBMD and vertebral strength, and their determinants, across the AN weight spectrum. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Clinical research center. Participants: 153 women (age 18 to 45): 64 with low-weight AN (BMI <18.5 kg/m2; 58% amenorrheic), 44 with atypical AN (18.5≤BMI<23 kg/m2; 30% amenorrheic), 45 eumenorrheic controls (19.2≤BMI<25 kg/m2). Measures: Int.vBMD and cross-sectional area (CSA) by quantitative computed tomography of L4; estimated vertebral strength (derived from Int.vBMD and CSA). Results: Int.vBMD and estimated vertebral strength were lowest in low-weight AN, intermediate in atypical AN, and highest in controls. CSA did not differ between groups; thus, vertebral strength (calculated using Int.vBMD and CSA) was driven by Int.vBMD. In AN, Int.vBMD and vertebral strength were associated positively with current BMI and nadir lifetime BMI (independent of current BMI). Int.vBMD and vertebral strength were lower in AN with current amenorrhea and longer lifetime amenorrhea duration. Among amenorrheic AN, Int.vBMD and vertebral strength were associated positively with testosterone. Conclusions: Int.vBMD and estimated vertebral strength (driven by Int.vBMD) are impaired across the AN weight spectrum and are associated with low BMI and endocrine dysfunction, both current and previous. Women with atypical AN experience diminished vertebral strength, partially due to prior low-weight and/or amenorrhea. Lack of current low-weight or amenorrhea in atypical AN does not preclude compromise of vertebral strength.

Vertebral Strength and Estimated Fracture Risk Across the BMI Spectrum in Women.

Somewhat paradoxically, fracture risk, which depends on applied loads and bone strength, is elevated in both anorexia nervosa and obesity at certain skeletal sites. Factor-of-risk (Φ), the ratio of applied load to bone strength, is a biomechanically based method to estimate fracture risk; theoretically, higher Φ reflects increased fracture risk. We estimated vertebral strength (linear combination of integral volumetric bone mineral density [Int.vBMD] and cross-sectional area from quantitative computed tomography [QCT]), vertebral compressive loads, and Φ at L4 in 176 women (65 anorexia nervosa, 45 lean controls, and 66 obese). Using biomechanical models, applied loads were estimated for: 1) standing; 2) arms flexed 90°, holding 5 kg in each hand (holding); 3) 45° trunk flexion, 5 kg in each hand (lifting); 4) 20° trunk right lateral bend, 10 kg in right hand (bending). We also investigated associations of Int.vBMD and vertebral strength with lean mass (from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT, from QCT). Women with anorexia nervosa had lower, whereas obese women had similar, Int.vBMD and estimated vertebral strength compared with controls. Vertebral loads were highest in obesity and lowest in anorexia nervosa for standing, holding, and lifting (p < 0.0001) but were highest in anorexia nervosa for bending (p < 0.02). Obese women had highest Φ for standing and lifting, whereas women with anorexia nervosa had highest Φ for bending (p < 0.0001). Obese and anorexia nervosa subjects had higher Φ for holding than controls (p < 0.03). Int.vBMD and estimated vertebral strength were associated positively with lean mass (R = 0.28 to 0.45, p ≤ 0.0001) in all groups combined and negatively with VAT (R = -[0.36 to 0.38], p < 0.003) within the obese group. Therefore, women with anorexia nervosa had higher estimated vertebral fracture risk (Φ) for holding and bending because of inferior vertebral strength. Despite similar vertebral strength as controls, obese women had higher vertebral fracture risk for standing, holding, and lifting because of higher applied loads from higher body weight. Examining the load-to-strength ratio helps explain increased fracture risk in both low-weight and obese women.

A pilot study of maudsley family therapy with group dialectical behavior therapy skills training in an intensive outpatient program for adolescent eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to provide pilot clinical data on the effectiveness of an intensive outpatient treatment model for adolescent eating disorders that combines Maudsley-based family therapy and group dialectical behavior therapy skills training. METHOD: Measures of physical and psychological status were gathered upon admission, discharge, and at 3 follow-up intervals. RESULTS: Adolescents who completed the program gained a significant amount of weight and experienced a significant decrease in eating disorder psychopathology. At the 1-year follow-up, 64% of adolescents were weight restored and menstruating normally. Measures of eating disorder psychopathology continued to improve up to a year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot, multimodal program warrants further investigation and may be an effective intermediate level of care treatment option for adolescent eating disorders.