Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pain Physician ; 25(8): E1163-E1173, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36375183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: First-line medications for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) are associated with a substantial rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects or insufficient efficacy. Neuromodulation techniques have been used for PDN, but a comprehensive review of the literature that incorporates several distinct device categories has yet to be undertaken. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to summarize the evidence regarding 4 major types of neuromodulation devices for the treatment of PDN. We focused on spinal cord stimulators (SCS), peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators (TENS), and scrambler therapy devices (ST) because they are often used for refractory neuropathic pain. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative Review. METHODS: A comprehensive and reproducible literature search was performed using PubMed with no search restrictions applied. The available Medical Subject Headings were used. Inclusion criteria included prospective studies, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports indexed from database inception to the search date (September 14, 2021). RESULTS: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, 10 of which were regarding SCS. Only 3 of the 10 were randomized controlled trials. We found no studies assessing contemporary PNS. Four studies assessed TENS, but the devices varied widely in voltages and waveforms. Two case reports described ST. LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias due to the nature of a narrative review, although a reproducible search strategy was utilized. Several neuromodulation modalities have minimal published evidence available. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for neuromodulation devices for the treatment of PDN mostly comprises open-label prospective trials or case reports. SCS has the most volume of evidence for efficacy. Studies regarding TENS show mixed results, possibly due to numerous device varieties. PNS and ST may hold promise based on their proposed mechanisms of action, but prospective controlled trials are needed.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Neuropathies , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Humans , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Prospective Studies , Diabetic Neuropathies/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Chronic Pain/therapy , Peripheral Nerves
2.
Cureus ; 14(3): e23134, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35444883

ABSTRACT

To improve medication reconciliation and decrease the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after the transfer of brain-injured neurologically impaired patients from an acute hospital setting to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, a performance improvement strategy was put in place. Such a strategy consisted of adding the proper DVT prophylaxis medication and dosage in the preadmission screen to prevent a delay in receiving the appropriate medication. This resulted in a dramatic reduction of inappropriately discontinued medications from 14.2% of patients to 5.78% over six months (p-value: 0.03). However, after the intervention, we surprisingly observed an increased rate of DVT from 6.2% to 10.11% (p-value: 0.03). This increase may be attributable to a larger number of venous duplex studies performed because of increased awareness of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

3.
Cureus ; 14(3): c60, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348291

ABSTRACT

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23134.].

4.
Pain ; 158(6): 1145-1152, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28282361

ABSTRACT

Pain evaluation in large community studies is difficult. Analgesics can be a useful tool in estimating pain-related conditions in which analgesic use is highly regulated. In this study, we evaluated analgesics consumption patterns of regular Israel Defense Force soldiers. We have performed a historical cohort study of 665,137 young adults during active duty in 2002 to 2012. Analgesics were prescribed to 518,242 (78%) soldiers, mostly for musculoskeletal pain (69.3%), abdominal pain (12.7%), and headache (12.1%). Acute (1-14 days), subacute (15-90), and chronic (>90 days) analgesic use episodes were experienced by 396,987 (59.7%), 74,591 (11.2%), and 46,664 (7%) of the population. In a multivariate model, predictors for chronic analgesics use were as follows: low intelligence, service in a combat supporting unit, previous pain diagnosis, male sex, Israeli nativity, low socioeconomic status, and high body mass index. Low intelligence had the highest odds ratio for chronic analgesic consumption (2.1) compared with other predictors. Chronic analgesic use was associated with a significant increase in health care utilization cost per year (911$ per soldier vs 199$ for nonusers), increased sick leave days per year (7.09 vs 0.67 for nonusers), and higher dropout rate from combat units (25% vs 9.2% for nonusers). Chronic use of analgesics is common among young adults, and it is an important predictor for unsuccessful military service and high health care utilization costs. Further studies in other setups are indicated.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/economics , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Pain/economics , Pain/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/epidemiology , Pain Measurement/economics , Pain Measurement/methods , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...