Real-World Effectiveness of Ensitrelvir in Reducing Severe Outcomes in Outpatients at High Risk for COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ensitrelvir, an oral antiviral, in reducing hospitalization risk in outpatients at high-risk for severe COVID-19 during the Omicron era. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a large Japanese health insurance claims database. It included high-risk outpatients for severe symptoms who received their first COVID-19 diagnosis between November 2022 and July 2023. The study included outpatients aged ≥ 18 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause hospitalization during the 4-week period from the date of outpatient diagnosis and medication, comparing the ensitrelvir group (n = 5177) and the no antiviral treatment group (n = 162,133). The risk ratio and risk difference were evaluated after adjusting patient background distribution by the inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) method. Secondary endpoints were incidence of respiratory and heart rate monitoring, oxygen therapy, ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death. RESULTS: The risk ratio for all-cause hospitalization between the ensitrelvir group (n = 167,385) and the no antiviral treatment group (n = 167,310) after IPTW adjustment was 0.629 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.420, 0.943]. The risk difference was - 0.291 [95% CI - 0.494, - 0.088]. The incidence of both respiratory and heart rate monitoring and oxygen therapy was lower in the ensitrelvir group. Ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death were difficult to assess because of the limited events. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of all-cause hospitalization was significantly lower in the ensitrelvir group than in the no antiviral treatment group, suggesting ensitrelvir is an effective treatment in patients at risk of severe COVID-19.

COVID-19 still poses a risk for patients with serious health conditions and weakened immune systems, who are more likely to develop severe illness. Several studies have indicated that some oral antiviral medications might be effective in preventing severe disease. This study aimed to evaluate if ensitrelvir, an oral antiviral medication, can help prevent hospitalization in outpatients who are at risk of developing severe symptoms from the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The hospitalization rates of patients who received ensitrelvir was compared with those who did not receive any antiviral treatment, using medical records from a large health insurance database in Japan focused on outpatients who were at risk of severe symptoms and were diagnosed with COVID-19 between November 2022 and July 2023. Respiratory and heart rate monitoring, oxygen therapy, ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death were also evaluated. The study found that patients who received ensitrelvir had a lower risk of being hospitalized compared to those who did not receive any antiviral treatment. The ensitrelvir group also had lower rates of respiratory and heart rate monitoring and oxygen therapy. However, it was challenging to assess the effects on ventilator use, intensive care admission, and all-cause death due to the small number of events in the population under evaluation. Based on these findings, ensitrelvir appears to be an effective treatment for reducing the risk of hospitalization in patients at risk of severe COVID-19.

How Many Clinical Trials Exist that Have Adopted Selective Safety Data Collection? NEJM Literature Search Results: The Possibility of Harmonizing the ICH E19 Guideline.

BACKGROUND: The selective safety data collection (SSDC) proposed in The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E19 guideline is a more selective approach to collect safety data of medicinal products with well-characterized safety profiles. There has been no systematic survey of the implementation status of SSDCs. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on clinical trials using SSDC published in The New England Journal of Medicine from February 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. By reviewing the retrieved texts, protocols, and statistical analysis plans, we identified the method of safety data collection and evaluated whether each trial adopted SSDC. RESULTS: Of the 459 trials of medicinal products searched, 44 clinical trials adopted SSDC. The common objectives of these studies were "to study additional endpoints" (31 trials, 70.5%) and "new indications of approved drugs" (8 trials, 18.2%). Participant number was more than 1000 in 33 trials (75.0%). Most trials adopted SSDC for the entire study population throughout the trial period. Death and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded in all trials. Twenty-nine (66.6%) recorded death, SAE, and AE leading to drug discontinuation, which were specified in the E19 draft guideline as the data that should be collected under all circumstances. CONCLUSION: There have already been cases where SSDC was used in clinical trials for regulatory application. It is desirable that the E19 guideline will harmonize the method for implementation of SSDC, making SSDC more common as an option for clinical trial design.

Estimation of a Suitable Number of Patients for Selective Safety Data Collection (ICH E19 Draft Guideline): When is the Safety Profile of a Drug Well Characterized?

PURPOSE: We propose methods to estimate a suitable number of patients for implementing selective safety data collection (SSDC) in clinical investigations based on a confidence interval of the incidence rate or risk difference using Monte Carlo simulation. METHODS: The incidence rates and risk differences of adverse events (AEs) were based on the safety outcome measures. A suitable number of patients for implementing SSDC was estimated based on the probability that the half-width of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of incidence rate or risk difference was equal to or less than a pre-specified cut-off value (0.5-3.0%). Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the suitable number of patients at probabilities of 70%, 80%, and 90%. The applicability of our proposed method for estimating a suitable number of patients for SSDC implementation was confirmed based on the incidence rates or risk differences from actual clinical trial data for panitumumab. RESULTS: We demonstrated the performance of our proposed method in estimating a suitable number of patients to implement SSDC in several situations. Furthermore, according to the safety datasets of three phase III clinical trials, the number of suitable patients for implementing SSDC using incidence rates or risk differences of common AEs with panitumumab could confirm the applicability of our proposed method. CONCLUSION: A suitable number of patients estimated based on our proposed method may be one of the foundations for implementing SSDC, as additional data accrual may not impact the precision of the estimates of the frequency of common AEs.

Comparison of the incidence of bleeding between baloxavir marboxil and other anti-influenza drugs among outpatients with influenza virus infection: A retrospective cohort study using an employment-based health insurance claims database in Japan.

PURPOSE: Alerts for bleeding events are included in the Japanese package inserts of some anti-influenza drugs, including baloxavir marboxil and oseltamivir. However, there are few reports on the incidence of bleeding events during treatment with anti-influenza drugs. This large-scale quantitative assessment compared the incidence of bleeding events in influenza patients treated with baloxavir and other anti-influenza drugs and in untreated patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a large-scale Japanese employment-based health insurance claims database provided by JMDC Inc. and included outpatients diagnosed with influenza between October 1, 2018 and April 11, 2019. Bleeding events were identified by International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes. Incidences were compared between patients treated with baloxavir or neuraminidase inhibitors and untreated patients. Odds ratios were calculated after exact matching to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 529 201 influenza episodes, 30 964 were untreated and 498 237 were treated with anti-influenza drugs: baloxavir, 207 630; oseltamivir, 143 722; zanamivir, 28 208; peramivir, 5304; laninamivir, 113 373. Crude incidence proportions for total bleeding up to 20 days after influenza diagnosis were similar among treated groups, with a slightly higher value for peramivir (0.21% vs. 0.19% for baloxavir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, and laninamivir), and 0.30% in untreated patients. After exact matching, the incidence of bleeding for baloxavir was similar to that for other anti-influenza treatments (odds ratios for baloxavir were 0.90-0.99 compared to other therapies). CONCLUSIONS: Based on real-world observation using a large-scale claims database, a similar incidence of bleeding events was observed in recipients of the different anti-influenza drugs.

Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a single-dose, oral antiinfluenza drug with a novel mechanism of action. We compared the incidence of hospitalization in patients treated with baloxavir vs neuraminidase inhibitors. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, we used real-world patient data extracted from a Japanese health insurance claims database. The enrollment period was 1 October 2018 to 17 April 2019. On day 1, eligible patients (N = 339 007) received baloxavir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir. Baseline characteristics were standardized using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary end point was the incidence of hospitalization (days 2-14). Secondary end points included antibacterial use, secondary pneumonia, and additional antiinfluenza drug use. RESULTS: Compared with the baloxavir group, the incidence of hospitalization was greater in the oseltamivir group (risk ratio [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 [1.00-2.00]; risk difference [RD] and 95% CI, 0.06 [.01-.12]) and zanamivir group (RR, 1.85 [1.23-2.78]; RD, 0.11 [.02-.20]). Oseltamivir-treated patients were less likely to require antibacterials than baloxavir-treated patients (RR, 0.87 [.82-.91]). However, oseltamivir-treated patients were more likely to be hospitalized with antibacterials (RR, 1.70 [1.21-2.38]) or antibacterial injection (RR, 1.67 [1.17-2.38]) than baloxavir-treated patients (post hoc analysis). Compared with baloxavir-treated patients, additional antiinfluenza drug use was greater in oseltamivir-, zanamivir-, and laninamivir-treated patients (RR, 1.51 [1.05-2.18], 2.84 [2.04-3.96], and 1.68 [1.35-2.10], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Baloxavir is an efficacious antiinfluenza treatment that may reduce hospitalization compared with oseltamivir and zanamivir. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000038159).

Comparison of Household Transmission of Influenza Virus From Index Patients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is expected to reduce influenza transmission by rapid reduction of viral load. The incidence of household transmission was compared between index patients (IPs) treated with baloxavir and those treated with neuraminidase inhibitors. METHODS: Using a Japanese claims database, the first family members with influenza diagnosis during the 2018-2019 influenza season were identified as IPs, and the diagnosis date was designated day 1. According to the anti-influenza drug dispensed to the IP, their families were classified into the oral baloxavir group and 3 controls: oral oseltamivir group (a primary control), inhaled zanamivir group, and inhaled laninamivir group. A household transmission was defined as influenza diagnosed for any non-IP family members during days 3-8. The incidence of household transmission was compared between groups using a logistic regression model adjusting backgrounds of IPs. RESULTS: The proportion of families with household transmission was 17.98% (15 226 of 84 672) in the baloxavir group and 24.16% (14 983 of 62 004) in the oseltamivir group. The covariate-adjusted odds ratio (oseltamivir/baloxavir) was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05-1.12), which indicated significantly lower incidence in the baloxavir group. The adjusted odds ratios (controls/baloxavir) against zanamivir and laninamivir were 0.93 (95% CI, .89-.97) and 0.99 (95% CI, .96-1.02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baloxavir may contribute to reduction in household transmission compared with oseltamivir. In comparison between baloxavir and inhalants, a similar reduction was not shown and it might be due to unmeasured confounding by administration route differences.

Safety and effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil for the treatment of influenza in Japanese clinical practice: A postmarketing surveillance of more than 3000 patients.

Baloxavir marboxil is an oral anti-influenza drug that inhibits the cap-dependent endonuclease of the virus polymerase acidic protein. In clinical trials, baloxavir reduced the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms and time to resolution of fever in adults, adolescents, and children. The purpose of this study is to collect data on the safety and effectiveness of baloxavir when used in clinical practice. This postmarketing surveillance (clinicaltrials.jp; JapicCTI-183882), conducted at 688 Japanese hospitals or clinics (March 2018 to March 2019), enrolled patients of any age with influenza A or B infection who received a single, weight-based dose of baloxavir. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were seen in 11.2% of 3094 patients during the 7-day observation period; the most common ADR was diarrhea (6.1%). ADRs were more common in children aged <12 years (14.1%) than in adults (10.0%). Almost all ADRs were non-serious (98.9%) and were recovered or recovering (96.7%). Median time to alleviation of symptoms (N = 2884) was 2.5 days (overall, influenza A, and influenza B groups). Median time to resolution of fever (N = 2946) was 1.5 days (overall, influenza A, and influenza B groups). Biphasic fever (increased temperature after previous fever resolution) was seen in 6.7% of patients overall and 28.6% of patients <6 years infected with influenza B, similar to rates published elsewhere with other influenza drugs and in untreated influenza. This postmarketing surveillance of >3000 patients suggests that baloxavir is well tolerated and effective regardless of patient age or influenza virus type.

Post-marketing safety evaluation of the intravenous anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor peramivir: A drug-use investigation in patients with high risk factors.

Peramivir, the only injectable anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor medically available in Japan at present, is considered first-line treatment in patients with high risk factors for influenza exacerbation. We conducted a drug-use investigation of peramivir in inpatients with high risk factors (old age, pregnancy, and underlying disease such as chronic respiratory disease) from January 2010 to March 2013. Data of 772 patients from 124 facilities across Japan were collected; peramivir's safety in 770 patients and effectiveness in 688 patients were examined. In total, 412 adverse events were observed in 219 patients (28.4%). Of these, 155 events were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in 98 patients (12.7%). Major ADRs (≥2%) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (5.1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (3.8%) and decreased white blood cell count (2.5%). Fourteen serious ADRs were observed in 12 patients (1.6%). All serious ADRs were resolved or improved except for two events for which outcomes were unknown. Multivariate analyses revealed that ADR incidences were significantly associated with these four backgrounds of patients: medical history, no influenza vaccination, renal impairment and other infection(s). With regard to its effectiveness, the median time to alleviation of both influenza symptoms and fever was 3 days, including the first day of administration, which was the same as in other previous surveillance studies. This surveillance study indicated the safety of peramivir in the treatment of influenza inpatients with high risk factors under routine clinical settings.

Post-marketing safety and effectiveness evaluation of the intravenous anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor peramivir. II: a pediatric drug use investigation.

Peramivir is the only intravenous formulation among anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitors currently available. Peramivir was approved for manufacturing and marketing in Japan in January 2010. In October 2010, an additional indication for pediatric use was approved. We conducted a pediatric drug use investigation of peramivir from October 2010 to February 2012 and evaluated its real-world safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients. We collected the data of 1254 peramivir-treated pediatric patients from 161 facilities across Japan and examined the safety in 1199 patients and effectiveness in 1188 patients. In total, 245 adverse events were observed with an incidence rate of 14.01% (168/1199). Of these, 115 events were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with an incidence rate of 7.67% (92/1199). Common ADRs were diarrhea and abnormal behavior, with incidence rates of 2.50% (30/1199) and 2.25% (27/1199), respectively. Fourteen serious ADRs were observed in 12 patients (1.00%), including 5 cases each of abnormal behavior and neutrophil count decreased. While 87.0% (100 events) of ADRs occurred within 3 days after the initiation of peramivir administration, 87.8% (101 events) resolved or improved within 7 days after onset. Multivariate analyses indicated that the presence or absence of underlying diseases/complications was significantly related to ADR incidence. With regard to effectiveness, the median time to alleviation of both influenza symptoms and fever was 3 days, including the first day of administration. Thus, this study confirms the pediatric safety of peramivir without any concerns about effectiveness under routine clinical settings.

Post-marketing safety and effectiveness evaluation of the intravenous anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor peramivir (I): a drug use investigation.

Peramivir is the only intravenous formulation among anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitors currently available. Peramivir was approved for manufacturing and marketing in Japan in January 2010. We conducted a drug use investigation of peramivir from October 2010 to February 2012 and evaluated its safety and effectiveness under routine clinical settings. We collected data of 1309 patients from 189 facilities across Japan and examined safety in 1174 patients and effectiveness in 1158 patients. In total, 143 adverse events were observed with an incidence rate of 7.33% (86/1174). Of these, 78 events were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with an incidence rate of 4.34% (51/1174). The most frequently reported ADRs were diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea, with incidence rates of 1.87% (22/1174), 0.85% (10/1174), and 0.68% (8/1174), respectively. Moreover, no ADR was reported as serious. ADR onset was within 3 days after the start of peramivir administration in 91.0% (71 events) of the 78 ADRs, and ADRs were resolved or improved within 7 days after onset in 96.2% (75 events) of the 78 ADRs. Neither patient characteristics nor treatment factors appeared to significantly affect drug safety. With regard to effectiveness, the median time to alleviation of both influenza symptoms and fever was 3 days, including the first day of administration. The present study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of peramivir under routine clinical settings.

Characterization of protamine uptake by opossum kidney epithelial cells.

Protamine, a mixture of polypeptides that is rich in arginine, has been used clinically as an antidote to heparin overdoses and a complexing agent in a long-acting insulin preparation. When protamine is administered intravenously, its abundant accumulation in the kidneys has been reported. However, the renal uptake mechanism for protamine is not clear. In this study, we examined the transport mechanism for protamine in opossum kidney (OK) cells, a suitable in vitro model for renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the association of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled protamine from salmon (FITC-protamine) by OK cells was inhibited by unlabeled protamine in a concentration-dependent manner. The association of FITC-protamine was temperature- and energy-dependent. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that the fluorescence was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus of OK cells. In addition, FITC-protamine association was inhibited by cationic drugs such as polycationic gentamicin and polymixin B, but it was increased by a basic amino acid, arginine. Inhibitors for clathrin- and caveolin-dependent endocytosis showed inhibitory effects on FITC-protamine association. Pretreatment with heparinase III partially but significantly decreased the association of FITC-protamine. These results suggest that protamine may be taken up by OK cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis, which may result in its localization in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the cells.

Effect of protamine on the accumulation of gentamicin in opossum kidney epithelial cells.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine whether or not protamine, an arginine-rich basic protein mixture, inhibits the accumulation of gentamicin, a nephrotoxic drug, in cultured opossum kidney (OK) epithelial cells. METHODS: The effect of protamine from salmon on accumulation and binding of [(3) H]gentamicin was investigated in OK cells. KEY FINDINGS: Protamine inhibited the binding and accumulation of [(3) H]gentamicin in a concentration-dependent manner. The accumulation of [(14) C]inulin, a marker of fluid-phase endocytosis, was not affected by protamine at concentrations up to 1 mm. l-Arginine at concentrations up to 10 mm had no significant effect on the accumulation of [(3) H]gentamicin. On the other hand, preincubation with 100 µm protamine for 5 min decreased the accumulation of [(3) H]gentamicin to almost the same extent as coincubation with 100 µm protamine for 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that protamine decreases the accumulation of gentamicin in OK cells. These findings suggest that protamine or its derivatives might be useful in preventing the nephrotoxicity of aminoglycoside antibiotics including gentamicin.