An integrative review of racism in nursing to inform anti-racist nursing praxis in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIM: To synthesise international literature to identify mechanisms that maintain racism in nursing and understand the factors that contribute to designing and implementing anti-racist praxis to inform nursing in Aotearoa New Zealand. DESIGN: An integrative literature review was undertaken, integrating Indigenous Kaupapa Maori methodologies to ensure a cultural and philosophical lens. METHODS: Peer-reviewed literature published, between January 2011 and July 2023 were sourced. Of 1296 articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria and 4 were identified via citation chaining. In total, 20 articles were included. The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Tool was applied, findings extracted, and thematic analysis completed utilising Indigenous Kaupapa Maori principles. DATA SOURCES: Databases, including CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed and Aus/NZ Reference Centre, were searched in July 2023. RESULTS: Two key themes were identified: (1) colonial active resistance to change; and (2) transformational, visionary, and proactive nursing. CONCLUSION: Nurses are well-positioned to confront the structures that maintain racism in health and education systems but are often actors in maintaining status quo. Anti-racist praxis can be a mechanism for nurses to reimagine, redefine and transform nursing care, leadership, and nursing education to begin to eradicate racism. REPORTING METHOD: This integrative review adhered to the 2020 Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Racism remains prevalent in nursing and the healthcare system. It is necessary to implement anti-racist praxis and policies that resist, deconstruct, and dismantle power and racism while validating Indigenous values, beliefs and practices. This is vital to deliver equitable health care. IMPACT: This integrative review presents lived realities and knowledge of Indigenous and racially minoritised nurses and scholars, alongside nursing allies to inform anti-racist praxis. This evidence signifies that it is time to walk the walk to challenge the colonising systems and processes that hold racism in place.

Integrating nurse practitioners into primary healthcare to advance health equity through a social justice lens: An integrative review.

AIM: To develop a framework to guide the successful integration of nurse practitioners (NPs) into practice settings and, working from a social justice lens, deliver comprehensive primary healthcare which advances health equity. DESIGN: Integrative review. METHODS: The integrative review was informed by the Whittemore and Knafl's framework and followed the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. Findings were extracted and thematically analysed using NVivo. A social justice lens informed all phases. DATA SOURCES: Databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, were searched for peer-reviewed literature published in English between 2005 and April 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included. Six themes were identified at the individual (micro), local health provider (meso), and national systems and structures (macro) levels of the health sector: (1) autonomy and agency; (2) awareness and visibility; (3) shared vision; (4) leadership; (5) funding and infrastructure; and (6) intentional support and self-care. The evidence-based framework is explicitly focused on the components required to successfully integrate NPs into primary healthcare to advance health equity. CONCLUSION: Integrating NPs into primary healthcare is complex and requires a multilevel approach at macro, meso and micro levels. NPs offer the potential to transform primary healthcare delivery to meet the health needs of local communities. Health workforce and integration policies and strategies are essential if the contribution of NPs is to be realized. The proposed framework offers an opportunity for further research to inform NP integration. IMPACT STATEMENT: Nurse practitioners (NPs) offer the potential to transform primary healthcare services to meet local community health needs and advance health equity. Globally, there is a lack of guidance and health policy to support the integration of the NP workforce. The developed framework provides guidance to successfully integrate NPs to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare grounded in social justice. Integrating NPs into PHC is complex and requires a multilevel approach at macro, meso and micro levels. The framework offers an opportunity for further research to inform NP integration, education and policy. SUMMARY STATEMENT: What problem did the study address: The challenges of integrating nurse practitioners (NPs) into primary healthcare (PHC) are internationally recognized. Attempts to establish NP roles in New Zealand have been ad hoc with limited research, evidence-informed frameworks or policy to guide integration initiatives. Our review builds on existing international literature to understand how NPs are successfully integrated into PHC to advance health equity and provide a guiding framework. What were the main findings: Six themes were identified across individual (micro), local health provider (meso) and national systems and structures (macro) levels as fundamental to NP integration: autonomy and agency; awareness and visibility of the NP and their role; a shared vision for the direction of primary healthcare utilizing NP scope of practice; leadership in all spaces; necessary funding and infrastructure; and intentional support and self-care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact: Given extant health workforce challenges together with persisting health inequities, NPs provide a solution to delivering comprehensive primary healthcare from a social justice lens to promote healthcare access and health equity. The proposed evidence-informed framework provides guidance for successful integration across the health sector, training providers, as well as the NP profession, and is a platform for future research. REPORTING METHOD: This integrative review adhered to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Whakawhanaungatanga-Building trust and connections: A qualitative study indigenous Maori patients and whanau (extended family network) hospital experiences.

AIMS: Investigated the experiences of Maori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa, New Zealand) patients and whanau (extended family network) engaging with acute hospital inpatient services and their priorities for a Maori-centred model of relational care. DESIGN: A qualitative Maori-centred research design using a Thought Space Wananga (learning through in-depth group discussion, deliberation and consideration) approach. METHODS: Two wananga were conducted between May 2022 and June 2022, with 13 Maori patients who had been acutely hospitalized within the past 12 months and their whanau members. The first wananga utilized storytelling and journey mapping to collect data. The second wananga refined the initial themes. Wananga were audio-recorded and then inductively coded and developed into themes. RESULTS: Thirteen patients and whanau attended the first wananga, while 10 patients and whanau participated in the second wananga). Four themes were developed: (1) Whakawhanaungatanga (establishing connections and relationships), (2) Whakamana (uplifting the status and esteem of Maori), (3) Whakawhitiwhiti korero (the importance of communicating, discussing and deliberating) and (4) Kotahitanga (working together with purpose) all provide insights into the importance of effectively engaging and connecting with Maori patients and whanau when acutely hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences and priorities of Maori patients and whanau affirm the international literature, suggesting that Indigenous relational concepts are critical to building relationships, connections and trust. Despite existing healthcare models for working with Indigenous peoples, their poor application contributes to sub-optimal healthcare experiences at all points of their healthcare journey. A relational mode of practice focused on engagement and forming connections better meets the needs of Indigenous peoples engaging with inpatient health services. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Despite the existence of Indigenous models of care, Indigenous peoples consistently report a lack of engagement and connection when accessing inpatient health services. Without establishing relationships, applying models of care is challenging. IMPACT (ADDRESSING): What problem did the study address? Internationally, healthcare systems are consistently ill-equipped to deliver culturally safe care for Indigenous and marginalized peoples, evident in ongoing health inequities. Like other reports of Indigenous experiences of health services, Maori express dissatisfaction with care delivery in an acute inpatient setting. This study investigated Maori patients and whanau experiences engaging with acute hospital inpatient services and their priorities for a Maori-centred model of relational care. What were the main findings? Maori patients and whanau recounted negative experiences with healthcare professionals lacking effective relationships and trust. Satisfaction occurred when engagement with health care professionals resembled Indigenous cultural rituals of encounter that considered their holistic, collective and dynamic worldviews. Previous models of relational care, while helpful, are not Indigenous and so do not address their needs, such as engagement as a mode of practice (how) to achieve this. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This research impacts Indigenous peoples' health outcomes, particularly Maori, and nurses and clinicians working and interacting within acute inpatient and other hospital settings. Indigenous research methods support co-constructing knowledge for translation into practical outcomes through transformational practices, policies and theory development. REPORTING METHOD: We used the Consolidated Criteria for Strengthening the Reporting of Health Research Involving Indigenous Peoples (CONSIDER) statement (see File S2-CONSIDER Checklist) and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines (see File S3-COREQ Checklist). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Maori patients and their whanau interviewed about their experiences were involved in data interpretation.

A tohu (sign) to open our eyes to the realities of Indigenous Maori registered nurses: A qualitative study.

AIMS: Identify the experiences of Maori nurses and priorities for a Maori model of relational care working with Maori patients and their whanau (extended family network) in acute hospital services. BACKGROUND: Maori, the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa (New Zealand), have a relational and holistic worldview fundamental to establishing relationships with Maori patients and their whanau. Increasing the Indigenous Maori nursing workforce can improve Maori patient experiences but is challenged by ongoing recruitment and retention issues. DESIGN: A qualitative Maori-centred research methodology with 12 Maori nurses. METHODS: Data were collected using wananga (learning through discussion, deliberation and consideration) using he aha o hikoi (journey mapping) and korero mai (storytelling). Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken using a mahi a roopu (group process) approach. This study was conducted between May 2022 and June 2022. RESULTS: Three key themes: (1) Maori first, nurse second, (2) Cultural loading and (3) Compromised realities were identified. Maori nurses' praxis used their complex cultural and clinical intelligence to engage in a mana-enhancing way (strengths-based) to improve the care delivery for whanau Maori during their hospitalization journey. Cultural loading meant Maori nurses were often burdened with unrecognized workloads as they provided care for Maori patients and whanau, which often compromised their cultural integrity. CONCLUSION: Nurses' commitment to care for whanau and their assigned patient load created extra burdens and threatened their cultural integrity. Their experiences highlighted modes of practice rather than models of care required to improve healthcare delivery for Maori entering the hospital. These findings signal issues and areas nursing leaders need to heed, necessary for addressing the retention of Maori in nursing and improving workload equity. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Maori nurses and service users were involved in the interpretation of the data.