ABSTRACT
Introduction: To establish the efficacy of ultrasound (US) combined with urine biomarkers in differentiating patients who require surgical management from those who do not, avoiding invasive investigations. Materials and Methods: From February 2019 to February 2021, all pediatric patients who presented with hydronephrosis were selected for the study. All renal units (RU) were evaluated by US, and fresh frozen voided urine samples were collected at the time of inclusion. Hydronephrosis grade was evaluated by the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) and an alternative grading system (AGS). Patients who had high-grade hydronephrosis on US were referred to renal scan (RS) or intervention, when there was an increase of dilatation in subsequent follow-up images. Fresh frozen urine from the control group with no history of renal diseases and no renal anomalies on US was collected. We compared differences of US parameters combined with urine biomarkers between surgically and non-surgically managed patients and between the groups of patients when they were stratified by different RS findings and analyzed whether urinary biomarkers give any additional value to US. Instead of the anterior-posterior diameter (APD), we used its ratio with mid-parenchymal thickness. The additional efficacy of biomarkers to US was calculated when the US component was derived to a cumulative APD/mid-parenchymal ratio. Results: Sixty-four patients with hydronephrosis were prospectively included in the study accounting for a total of 81 patient visits and 162 RUs evaluated. A control group of 26 patients was collected. The mean age at inclusion in the hydronephrosis group was 43.7(±45.5) months, and a mean age in a control group was 61.2(±41.3) months. The cumulative APD/mid-parenchymal ratio combined with urinary albumin, ß2 microglobulin (ß2-M), and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalcin may have a better performance in the prediction of surgical intervention than the cumulative APD/mid-parenchymal ratio alone (p = 0.1). The best performance to detect the increased tissue transit time and obstructive curve on RS was demonstrated by the ß2-M creatinine ratio. An increased cumulative APD/mid-parenchymal ratio with biomarkers together had a fairly good sensitivity and specificity for detection of DRF < 40%. Conclusions: According to our data, the APD/mid-parenchymal ratio alone has good efficacy in prediction of surgery and abnormal RS findings especially when combined with urine biomarkers.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent triple-blind sham procedure-controlled study revealed neutral effects of the cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) on exercise tolerance and symptoms in patients with stable angina. Current data about the effects of CSWT on global and regional myocardial contractility and perfusion is limited. Hereby we report the results of an imaging sub-study that evaluated the capacity of CSWT to ameliorate myocardial ischemia induced during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: Prospective, randomized, triple-blind, sham procedure-controlled study enrolled 72 adult subjects who complied with defined inclusion criteria. The subjects were assigned to the OMT + CSWT and the OMT + sham procedure study groups with 1:1 ratio. Application of the CSWT covered all segments of the left ventricle. Imaging ischemia tests were performed in 59 study patients: DSE and SPECT before the CSWT treatment and after 6 months, with DSE carried out additionally at 3 months after randomization. Co-primary endpoints of the study were: change in wall motion score index (WMSI), representing the stress-induced impairment of regional myocardial function, and change in summed difference score (SDS), representing the amount of perfusion defect. RESULTS: OMT + CSWT and OMT + sham procedure study groups included 30 and 29 patients, respectively. Regional myocardial contractility during DSE significantly improved at 3 months follow-up in OMT + CSWT group compared to baseline as shown by WMSI at stress (1.4 ± 0.4 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), but not in OMT + sham procedure group (1.5 ± 0.3 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.136). The difference in stress DSE results between both study groups disappeared after 6 months. SPECT results demonstrated a significant reduction of inducible ischemia in OMT + CSWT group compared to OMT + sham procedure group at 6 months follow-up (SDS dropped from 5.4 ± 3.7 to 3.6 ± 3.8 vs 6.4 ± 5.9 to 6.2 ± 5 respectively, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac shock wave treatment showed the ability to reduce stress-induced myocardial ischemia, as assessed by wall motion abnormalities and perfusion defects, compared to sham procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02339454 ). The trial was registered retrospectively on 12 January 2015.
