P300 deficits in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The P300 (P3) event-related potential (ERP) component, a possible endophenotype for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), has been widely examined in children, but received little attention in adults. Our objective was to conduct a meta-analysis of P3 studies in adults with ADHD. METHOD: We searched the Medline and PsycINFO databases for controlled studies examining both adult ADHD and matched healthy controls. Six relevant publications were identified for the meta-analysis, which had comparable data across studies with regard to the amplitude of ERP components related to target detection (P3, P3b). Pooled effect size (ES) for P3 amplitude as well as the association of the ES with age and gender were investigated using meta-regression. RESULTS: Comparing the ADHD group versus controls, the pooled effect size for a decrease in P3 amplitude was in the medium range (Cohen's d=-0.55, p=0.0006). Additionally, meta-regression revealed that decrease in P3 amplitude significantly varied with the mean age of ADHD patients (p=0.0087), with a gradual increasing of the difference at higher ages. Results also showed a significant association between the ES and gender, indicating a more pronounced reduction of P3 amplitude in the ADHD group versus controls when females were predominantly represented in the sample. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of P3 characteristics in adults with ADHD. It reveals a significantly decreased P3 amplitude during target detection. Our result that the reduction in P3 amplitude increases with age is interpreted in a neurodevelopmental context.

Executive function in deficit schizophrenia: what do the dimensions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test tell us?

Neuropsychological characterization of the schizophrenia deficit syndrome is an unresolved issue. The initial assumption was that patients with deficit syndrome show more definitive impairments on tests sensitive for frontal and parietal functions compared with nondeficit patients,but recent studies failed to confirm this assumption. The fundamental question is whether a more refined delineation of executive dysfunctions is able to yield differences between deficit and nondeficit patients. To investigate this question, we implemented a factor analytic approach to explore potential differences between deficit and nondeficit patients using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Our paper presents an exploratory factor analysis of the WCST on schizophrenia patients and healthy samples, and a comparison among deficit, non-deficit patients with schizophrenia and control samples using the identified factors. A total of 154 patients with schizophrenia fulfilling the criteria for the deficit syndrome, 121 nondeficit patients, and 130 healthy controls were compared. Factor analysis of the WCST variables using the principal component method resulted in a two-factor solution. Comparison of the diagnostic groups on each of the factors revealed that deficit schizophrenia patients suffer from a more severe degree of impairment on the 'General executive function' factor than nondeficit schizophrenia patients. To our knowledge this is the first study that compared patients with the deficit and non-deficit forms of schizophrenia using WCST factor analytic techniques. Our results provide an insight into the cognitive profile of schizophrenia patients with regard to WCST, which could serve as a framework for future clinical and research endeavors.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): gender- and age-related differences in neurocognition.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing recognition that the clinical symptom characteristics associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) persist into adulthood in a high proportion of subjects, little is known about the persistence of neurocognitive deficits in ADHD. The objective was twofold: (1) to conduct a meta-analysis of neuropsychological studies to characterize attentional performance in subjects with adult ADHD by examining differences in ADHD versus normal control subjects; and (2) to investigate whether these differences vary as a function of age and gender. METHOD: Twenty-five neuropsychological studies comparing subjects with adult ADHD and healthy controls were evaluated. Statistical effect size was determined to characterize the difference between ADHD and control subjects. Meta-regression analysis was applied to investigate whether the difference between ADHD and control subjects varied as a function of age and gender across studies. RESULTS: Tests measuring focused and sustained attention yielded an effect size with medium to large magnitude whereas tests of simple attention resulted in a small to medium effect size in terms of poorer attention functioning of ADHD subjects versus controls. On some of the measures (e.g. Stroop interference), a lower level of attention functioning in the ADHD group versus the controls was associated with male gender. CONCLUSIONS: Adult ADHD subjects display significantly poorer functioning versus healthy controls on complex but not on simple tasks of attention, and the degree of impairment varies with gender, with males displaying a higher level of impairment.