Translating Evidence into Practice: A Review of Clinical Practice and Outcomes following the Adoption of an Early Post-Mastectomy Discharge Protocol in a Nigerian Hospital.

Introduction: In Nigeria, mastectomy is the most common surgical treatment for breast cancer. Patients are often kept on admission for days until wound drains are removed. An early discharge programme was piloted in a Nigerian hospital in 2017 with very satisfactory outcomes. The impact of this evidence on clinical practice and surgical outcomes was evaluated over 5 years. Methods: From a prospectively maintained institutional database, the details of patients who underwent mastectomy between 2018 and 2022 were obtained. The duration of post-operative stay was obtained and analysed per year to determine the trend. Post-operative surgical complications such as seroma, haematoma, flap necrosis, and surgical site infection were analysed. Results: Overall, 147 patients (69%) had early discharge during the review period. Twenty-two patients (10.3%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery, 61 patients (28.6%) were discharged within 24-48 h, and 64 patients (30%) were discharged between 48 and 72 h. There was a steady increase in the adoption of the early discharge protocol over time with a 50% adoption rate in 2018 and 95% in 2022. The mean duration of hospital stay declined steadily from 3.9 days in 2018 to 2.2 days in 2022. Early discharge did not result in any compromise to post-operative outcomes. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the sustainability of early post-mastectomy discharge in a resource-limited setting with very satisfactory outcomes. It also provides a unique example of how locally generated evidence can guide local practice. We consider these findings generalisable in other Nigerian hospitals and low- and middle-income countries with similar contexts.

Legalisation of abortion in a poor-resource setting: nigerian undergraduates' perspectives.

Background: Abortion is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality amongst Nigerian women in a country with restrictive abortion laws. Despite being illegal, abortions are still performed, and about 50% of abortions are performed by untrained persons in unhygienic conditions. This study assessed the determinants of attitude of undergraduates to legalisation of safe abortion in Nigeria. Methods: It is a descriptive cross-sectional study. We used a three-stage sampling technique to select 423 undergraduates using a pre-tested questionnaire. The predictors of attitude towards abortion and its legalisation were identified during multivariate analysis. Results: Good knowledge of abortion and its sequelae was found in about two-thirds (62.2%) of the participants, while over half (56.3%) had a negative perspective to abortion legalisation in Nigeria. Older participants were more likely to have positive perspectives to legalisation of abortion compared to their younger counterparts (odds ratio [OR] = 4.72, confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-8.55). Furthermore, respondents from upper social class and those with good knowledge were more likely to have positive perspectives to legalisation of abortion compared to their counterparts (OR = 5.63, CI: 3.12-10.16 and OR = 4.50, CI: 2.89-7.01). Conclusion: The study showed that respondents' knowledge of abortion was relatively low amongst the study population, and more than half of the respondents did not want abortion to be legalised. Increasing awareness on the importance of abortion and its complications in Nigeria will curb the menace of death due to abortion now and in the future.