[Effect of oral dexamethasone given 24 hours previously on docetaxel-induced edema: a retrospective study].

In Europe and the United States, beginning steroid treatment on the day before docetaxel(DTX)administration is recommended to reduce edema and/or hypersensitivity symptoms. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of starting steroid treatment on the day before DTX administration. Patients with breast cancer who received 4 or more cycles of DTX with or without trastuzumab or DTX and cyclophosphamide(TC)with or without trastuzumab as pre- or post-operative chemotherapy in our hospital between January 2010 and May 2012 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Patients were classified as those who started taking steroids on the day of DTX administration(GroupA: 62 patients)and those who started taking steroids on the day before DTX administration(GroupB: 47 patients). The incidence of edema and/or hypersensitivity was retrospectively compared between these groups after the completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The incidence of edema was significantly lower in GroupB (n=12, 25.5%)than in GroupA (n=28, 45.2%; p=0.04). The onset of edema also tended to be later in GroupB. The incidence of hypersensitivity tended to be lower in GroupB(n=3, 6.4%)than in GroupA (n=8, 12.9%), although this difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest the benefit of steroid treatment started on the day before DTX administration in preventing the development of edema. Results also suggest that the onset of edema could be delayed by this administration method. We recommend that steroid premedication, which can lead to a reduction in adverse drug reactions to DTX, be used to help maintain patients' quality of life(QOL)and to support treatment continuation.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and vancomycin dose requirement in patients with sepsis.

PURPOSE: Vancomycin has been used in patients with sepsis infected by MRSA and shows large interindividual variability in its dosing. In this observational study the potential influence of sepsis status on the vancomycin dose requirement in relation to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria was assessed. METHODS: From about 250 patients receiving serum vancomycin monitoring from May 2006 to April 2011 at the Osaka National Hospital, 105 adult patients who had been assessed using the SIRS criteria were identified. Patients on chemotherapy or intermittent positive pressure ventilation in whom the SIRS criteria could not accurately evaluate inflammatory status were excluded. Using two vancomycin serum concentrations at peak and trough, individual pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by the Bayesian estimation method using a two-compartment model. Creatinine clearance rate was estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (eCcr). RESULTS: Patients with SIRS had a significantly higher vancomycin clearance than those without SIRS, indicating that SIRS patients had a higher elimination capacity. The vancomycin clearance was positively correlated with the SIRS score defined as the number of positive items in the criteria, and negatively with age, except in patients with renal dysfunction. A linear relationship between the vancomycin clearance and eCcr remained even in the supernormal eCcr phase (more than approximately 120 mL/min). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a new insight into the need for quick prediction of dose requirement. That is, an increased vancomycin dosage would be needed in patients with a higher SIRS score to maintain the therapeutic target concentration, in particular in those with a high eCcr value.

Decreased vancomycin clearance in patients with congestive heart failure.

PURPOSE: Congestive heart failure (CHF) alters the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, including cardiovascular agents, due to decreased cardiac output and decreased renal blood flow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of CHF on the clearance of vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibacterial agent. METHODS: After reviewing more than 1,500 clinical charts of patients who received vancomycin therapy and whose serum vancomycin level was monitored, we identified 101 patients who also had the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed at that time. The fluorescence polarization immunoassay method was used to measure vancomycin serum concentrations in these patients 1 h after the end of vancomycin infusion and just before the next administration. Using these two measurements, we calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters using the Bayesian estimator. RESULTS: Patients with an LVEF of <40 % (16 patients) or those with an LVEF of ≥ 40 % and <60 % (40 % ≤ LVEF < 60 % ; 32 patients) had a significantly lower vancomycin clearance than patients with LVEF of ≥ 60 % (53 patients) (2.29 ± 0.95 or 2.79 ± 0.99 vs. 3.50 ± 1.04 L/h; p < 0.001 or p < 0.01, respectively). Vancomycin clearance was strongly correlated not only with estimated creatinine clearance (CLcr) in patients with an LVEF of <40 % (r = 0.828) and 40 % ≤ LVEF < 60 % (r = 0.773), but also with an LVEF in patients with a CLcr of <60 mL/min (r = 0.646). Consistent with these findings, multiple regression analysis revealed that CLcr, LVEF and body weight were important independent variables for vancomycin clearance (r(2) = 0.649). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin clearance decreased with decreasing cardiac function (LVEF) and decreasing CLcr. This finding suggests that vancomycin clearance is affected by cardiac function and would be predicted not only CLcr but also by LVEF.

[Etiology and management of venous pain during intravenous administration of oxaliplatin].

In Japan, XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) was approved for the treatment of advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer in September 2009. However, patients treated with XELOX sometimes experience intense, sporadic venous pain during administration of oxaliplatin through peripheral vein. To investigate the etiology and management of this event, we measured the titratable acidity, osmotic pressure, and pH of 5% dextrose in water (D5W) containing oxaliplatin with or without dexamethasone. The dexamethasone-containing solution was then tested for its efficacy in venous pain relief. D5W containing oxaliplatin had a pH of approximately 4. 8, whereas the titratable acidity and osmotic pressure were 0. 1 mEq/L and 300-320 mOsm/L, respectively, suggesting that the venous pain was partly attributable to the pH.When 1. 65-6. 6 mg of dexamethasone was added to this solution, the pH of the resulting solution was increased to 6. 5-7. 6. Moreover, pain was relieved in patients administered oxaliplatin with dexamethasone in D5W. When adjusted for pH by the addition of 1. 65-3. 3 mg of dexamethasone, oxaliplatin in D5W is associated with less venous pain without decreasing oxaliplatin content although it is not generally recommended to dissolve oxaliplatin in a basic solution since it is unstable under alkaline conditions.

[A case of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer treated by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy following cancer pain alleviation by low-dose matrix-type transdermal fentanyl].

Cancer pain often makes patient's performance status worsen and is one of the difficulties in anti-cancer therapy. We report a case of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer with cancer pain, which was treated by matrix-type transdermal fentanyl following slow-releasing oxycodone, which caused severe constipation. Rotation to matrix-type transdermal fentanyl (Durotep MT 2.1 mg) releaved severe constipation as well as cancer pain. The patient could take gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Low-dose matrix-type transdermal fentanyl (Durotep MT 2.1 mg) is useful for opioid rotation from low-dose morphine or oxycodone with uncontrolled side effects, and it contributes to continuation of anti-cancer therapy.