The efficacy and safety of paclitaxel plus bevacizumab therapy in breast cancer patients with visceral crisis.

BACKGROUND: Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is defined as severe organ dysfunction requiring rapidly efficacious therapy. Although weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (wPTX + BV) achieves a high response rate in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC, the efficacy and safety of wPTX + BV for visceral crisis is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with MBC with visceral crisis who received wPTX + BV. Visceral crisis was defined as follows: liver dysfunction (aspartate or alanine aminotransferase >200 U/L or total bilirubin >1.5 mg/dl), respiratory dysfunction (carcinomatous lymphangiomatosis, SpO2 <93% in ambient air or required thoracentesis), superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, or bone marrow carcinomatosis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks. We also investigated time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with respiratory dysfunction (n = 29), liver dysfunction (n = 10), bone marrow carcinomatosis (n = 7), and SVC syndrome (n = 2) were eligible for this investigation. The proportion of patients on-treatment with wPTX + BV after 12 weeks was 63% (30/44), and the other patients discontinued wPTX + BV because of adverse events (n = 5) and disease progression (n = 9). Median TTF and OS, and the ORR were 131 days and 323 days, and 41%, respectively. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION: wPTX + BV achieved favorable efficacy and safety for treating patients with visceral crisis and may therefore be considered an option for the treatment of this acutely severe clinical condition.

Contamination of lenalidomide on blister packages after administration and its exposure countermeasures.

BACKGROUND: Reliable exposure control measures are needed to avoid occupational exposures from hazardous drugs. However, there is little information on blister packages concerning exposure. We investigated the contamination and exposure control methods of lenalidomide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine facilities involved with the RevMate program (the Japanese REMS program) participated in this study. Blister packages (10 capsules/ sheet, no cuts) were collected from each institution after the administration of 5-mg Revlimid capsules. Additionally, the safety performance of different gloves was tested. RESULTS: A total of 18 samples were analyzed and the results revealed that all samples were contaminated with lenalidomide. Our questionnaire revealed that all pharmacists handled the blister packages with their bare hands when they were checking the remaining capsules of lenalidomide. We analyzed gloves made from four different materials (nitrile, polyvinyl chloride, latex, and polyethylene) and found no permeability in any glove type. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the spent blister package is a potential source of exposure to lenalidomide. All medical staff and caregivers should wear gloves when they handle lenalidomide.