ABSTRACT
BackgroundIt is widely reported that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has resulted in high number of cases, but relatively low incidence of severe disease and deaths, compared to the pre-Omicron variants of concern. We aim to assess the differences in symptom prevalence between Omicron and pre-Omicron infections in a sub-Saharan African population. MethodsIn this cross-sectional observational study, we collected data from children and adult outpatients presenting at two primary healthcare facilities in Blantyre, Malawi. Eligible participants were aged >1month old, with signs suggestive of COVID-19, and those not suspected of COVID-19. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and positive samples whole genome sequenced to identify the infecting variant. The primary outcome was the likelihood of presenting with a given symptom in individuals testing positive during the period in which Omicron-dominated (December 2021 to March 2022) with those infected during the pre-Omicron period (August 2021 to November 2021). FindingsAmong 5176 study participants, the median age was 28 years (IQR 21-38), of which 6.4% were under 5, 9.2% were 6 to 17 years, 77% were 18 to 50 years, and 7.1% were above 50 years old. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 23% (1187/5188), varying over time, with peaks in January 2021, July 2021 and December 2021, driven by the Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.1/2) variants, respectively. Headache (OR 0.47[CI 0.29 - 0.79]), cough (OR 0.37[CI 0.22 - 0.61]), fatigue (OR 0.20[CI 0.08 - 0.48]) and abdominal pain (OR 0.38[CI 0.18 - 0.78]) were less common in participants infected during the Omicron-dominant period than during pre-Omicron period. Fever was more common in participants infected during the Omicron-dominated period than during pre-Omicron period (OR 2.46[CI 1.29 - 4.97]). COVID-19 vaccination, accounting for number of doses and days since last dose, was not associated with a reduced risk of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (1 dose, OR 1.10[CI 0.39 - 2.66]; 2 doses, OR 1.11[CI 0.40 - 2.57]; all p=0.8). InterpretationIn this Malawian population, the prevalence of clinical symptoms associated with Omicron infection differ from those of pre-Omicron infections and may be harder to identify clinically with current symptom guidelines. To maintain robust surveillance for COVID-19 and emerging variants, case definitions and testing policies will need to be regularly reviewed to ensure case ascertainment.
ABSTRACT
Although the COVID-19 pandemic has left no country untouched there has been limited research to understand clinical and immunological responses in African populations. Here we comprehensively characterise patients hospitalised with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, and healthy community controls. PCR-confirmed COVID-19 participants were more likely to receive dexamethasone and a beta-lactam antibiotic, and survive to hospital discharge than PCR-/IgG+ and PCR-/IgG-participants. PCR-/IgG+ participants exhibited a nasal and systemic cytokine signature analogous to PCR-confirmed COVID-19 participants, but increased propensity for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae colonisation. We did not find evidence that HIV co-infection in COVID-19 participants was associated with mortality or altered cytokine responses. The nasal immune signature in PCR-/IgG+ and PCR-confirmed COVID-19 participants was distinct and predominated by chemokines and neutrophils. In addition, PCR-/IgG+ individuals with high COVID-19 clinical suspicion had inflammatory profiles analogous to PCR-confirmed disease and potentially represent a target population for COVID-19 treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundIn low-income countries, like Malawi, important public health measures including social distancing or a lockdown, have been challenging to implement owing to socioeconomic constraints, leading to predictions that the COVID-19 pandemic would progress rapidly. However, due to limited capacity to test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, there are no reliable estimates of the true burden of infection and death. We, therefore, conducted a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey amongst health care workers (HCW) in Blantyre city to estimate the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in urban Malawi. MethodsFive hundred otherwise asymptomatic HCWs were recruited from Blantyre City (Malawi) from 22nd May 2020 to 19th June 2020 and serum samples were collected all participants. A commercial ELISA was used to measure SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in serum. We run local negative samples (2018 - 2019) to verify the specificity of the assay. To estimate the seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 antibodies, we adjusted the proportion of positive results based on local specificity of the assay. ResultsEighty-four participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The HCW with a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody result came from different parts of the city. The adjusted seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 12.3% [CI 9.0-15.7]. Using age-stratified infection fatality estimates reported from elsewhere, we found that at the observed adjusted seroprevalence, the number of predicted deaths was 8 times the number of reported deaths. ConclusionThe high seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among HCW and the discrepancy in the predicted versus reported deaths, suggests that there was early exposure but slow progression of COVID-19 epidemic in urban Malawi. This highlights the urgent need for development of locally parameterised mathematical models to more accurately predict the trajectory of the epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa for better evidence-based policy decisions and public health response planning.
