Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Am Surg ; 90(3): 345-349, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rates of firearm violence (FV) surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a paucity of data regarding older adults (OAs) (≥65 years old). This study aimed to evaluate patterns of FV against OAs before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, hypothesizing decreased firearm incidents, injuries, and deaths for OAs due to restricted social movement. METHODS: Retrospective (2016-2021) data for OAs were obtained from the Gun Violence Archive. The rate of FV was weighted per 10,000 OAs using annual population data from the United States Census Bureau. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare annual firearm incidence rates, number of OAs killed, and number of OAs injured from 2016-2020 to 2021. RESULTS: From 944 OA-involved shootings, 842 died in 2021. The median total firearm incidents per month per 10,000 OAs decreased in 2021 vs 2016 (.65 vs .38, P < .001), 2017 (.63 vs .38, P < .001), 2018 (.61 vs .38, P < .001), 2019 (.39 vs .38, P = .003), and 2020 (.43 vs .38, P = .012). However, there was an increased median number of OAs killed in 2021 vs 2020 (.38 vs .38, P = .009), but no difference from 2016-2019 vs 2021 (all P > .05). The median number of firearm injuries decreased from 2017 to 2021 (.21 vs .19, P = .001) and 2020 to 2021 (.19 vs .19 P < .001). DISCUSSION: Firearm incidents involving OAs decreased in 2021 compared to pre-pandemic years; however, there was a slight increase in deaths compared to 2020. This may reflect increased social isolation; however, future research is needed to understand why this occurred.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Pandemics , Homicide , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Violence , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(1): 59-66, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31699181

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a newly developed Central-Line Insertion Site Assessment (CLISA) score on the incidence of local inflammation or infection for CLABSI prevention. DESIGN: A pre- and postintervention, quasi-experimental quality improvement study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients with central venous catheters (CVCs) hospitalized in an intensive care unit or oncology ward at a large academic medical center. METHODS: We evaluated CLISA score impact on insertion site inflammation and infection (CLISA score of 2 or 3) incidence in the baseline period (June 2014-January 2015) and the intervention period (April 2015-October 2017) using interrupted times series and generalized linear mixed-effects multivariable analyses. These were run separately for days-to-line removal from identification of a CLISA score of 2 or 3. CLISA score interrater reliability and photo quiz results were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 6,957 CVCs assessed 40,846 times, percentage of lines with CLISA score of 2 or 3 in the baseline and intervention periods decreased by 78.2% (from 22.0% to 4.7%), with a significant immediate decrease in the time-series analysis (P < .001). According to the multivariable regression, the intervention was associated with lower percentage of lines with a CLISA score of 2 or 3, after adjusting for age, gender, CVC body location, and hospital unit (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.34; P < .001). According to the multivariate regression, days to removal of lines with CLISA score of 2 or 3 was 3.19 days faster after the intervention (P < .001). Also, line dwell time decreased 37.1% from a mean of 14 days (standard deviation [SD], 10.6) to 8.8 days (SD, 9.0) (P < .001). Device utilization ratios decreased 9% from 0.64 (SD, 0.08) to 0.58 (SD, 0.06) (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: The CLISA score creates a common language for assessing line infection risk and successfully promotes high compliance with best practices in timely line removal.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Central Venous Catheters , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Bacteremia/prevention & control , California/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Oncology Service, Hospital , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Am Surg ; 78(10): 1156-60, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23025962

ABSTRACT

Clearance of cervical spine (CS) precautions in the neurologically altered blunt trauma patient can be difficult. Physical examination is not reliable, and although computed tomography (CT) may reveal no evidence of fracture, it is generally believed to be an inferior modality for assessing ligamentous and cord injuries. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is expensive and may be risky in critically ill patients. Conversely, prolonged rigid collar use is associated with pressure ulceration and other complications. Multidetector CT raises the possibility of clearing CS on the basis of CT alone. We performed a retrospective review at our Level I trauma center of all blunt trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale Score 14 or less who underwent both CT and MRI CS with negative CT. One hundred fourteen patients met inclusion criteria, of which 23 had MRI findings. Seven (6%) of these had neurologic deficits and/or a change in management on the basis of MRI findings. Although use of the single-slice scanner was significantly associated with MRI findings (odds ratio, 2.62; P=0.023), no significant clinical risk factors were identified. Patients with MRI findings were heterogeneous in terms of age, mechanism, and Injury Severity Score. We conclude that CS MRI continues play a vital role in the workup of neurologically altered patients.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
4.
J Trauma ; 71(2): 401-6, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21825944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) is a noninvasive means to measure blood flow through the superficial skin capillary plexus using flux units. Our objective was to determine the ability of LDI of the skin to detect and quantify rapid, severe hemorrhage. METHODS: Five Yucatan mini-pigs (25-35 kg) underwent controlled hemorrhage of 25 mL/kg blood for 20 minutes. Median flux of a 10 cm × 10 cm area of the lower abdomen was measured at 2-minute intervals from initiation of hemorrhage to resuscitation with concurrent measurement of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: Average time to a change of 5 U in flux following start of hemorrhage was 2.4 minutes. This was significantly faster than time to change in HR (19.2 minutes, p < 0.05) and showed a trend toward more rapid identification of hemorrhage relative to changes in SBP (3.2 minutes, p = 0.157) and MAP (3.6 minutes, p = 0.083). Flux changes occurred at smaller % total blood volume lost than HR (3.94% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.05) and trended toward smaller volume identification than SBP (4.88%, p = 0.180) and MAP (5.36%, p = 0.102). Average correlation (ρ) of blood volume lost to flux was -0.974; HR, 0.346; SBP, -0.978; and MAP, -0.975. A change of 5 flux units was significantly more sensitive for hemorrhage than a change of 5 beats per minute in HR or 5 mm Hg in SBP or MAP (0.596 vs. 0.169, 0.438, and 0.287 respectively, all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: LDI is a sensitive, specific, and early means to detect and quantify severe hemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/diagnosis , Skin/blood supply , Animals , Blood Volume , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Swine , Swine, Miniature
5.
Am Surg ; 76(10): 1059-62, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21105609

ABSTRACT

The shortage of organs available for transplantation has become a national crisis. The Department of Health and Human Services established performance benchmarks for timely notification, donation after cardiac death (DCD), and conversion rates (total donors/eligible deaths) to guide organ procurement organizations and donor hospitals in their attempts to increase the number of transplantable organs. In January 2007, an organ donor council (ODC) with an ongoing performance improvement case review process was created at a Level I trauma center. A critical care devastating brain injury protocol and a DCD policy were instituted. Best performance benchmarks were evaluated before and after establishment of the ODC. At our center, the total number of referrals increased from 96 in 2006 to 139 in 2007 and 143 in 2008. Timely notification rate increased from 64 per cent in 2006 to 83 per cent in 2007 and 2008 (P < 0.01). DCD rate increased from 0 per cent in 2006 to 13 per cent in 2007 (P = 0.06) and 10 per cent in 2008 (P = 0.09). Conversion rate increased from 53 per cent in 2007 to 78 per cent in 2008 (P = 0.05) and 73 per cent in 2009 (P = 0.16). Organs transplanted per eligible death trended upward from 1.80 in 2007 to 2.54 in 2009 (P = 0.20). As a consequence, the establishment of a multidisciplinary ODC and performance improvement initiative demonstrated improved donation outcomes.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards , Benchmarking , Brain Death , Brain Injuries , California , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Procurement/trends , Trauma Centers
6.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 86(5): 281-3, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17580807

ABSTRACT

A 29-year-old woman presented with an unusual lesion on the right auricular antihelix. The mass was purple and painful, and it had been present for 17 years. Preoperatively, the presumptive diagnosis was a venous malformation. The mass was resected, and a staged reconstruction was performed. Microscopic analysis of the specimen revealed that the lesion was an angioleiomyoma. Most cases of angioleiomyoma involve the extremities; few have been described in the head and neck region, and very few of those have been reported on the ear. Among those auricular angioleiomyomas that have been reported, most were distinctly painless. We report a new, atypical case of this unusual tumor.


Subject(s)
Angiomyoma/pathology , Ear Neoplasms/pathology , Ear, External/pathology , Adult , Angiomyoma/surgery , Ear Neoplasms/surgery , Ear, External/surgery , Female , Humans , Plastic Surgery Procedures
7.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 22(8): 897-901, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The surgical treatment of low rectal cancer commonly includes low pelvic anastomoses with coloanal or ultralow colorectal anastomoses. Anastomotic leak rates in low pelvic anastomoses range from 4 to 26%. Many surgeons opt to routinely create a diverting ostomy to reduce the extent of morbidity should an anastomotic leak occur. The intent of our study was to determine if our policy of selected diversion is safe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 66 rectal cancer patients who underwent proctectomy and low pelvic anastomoses -- less than 6 cm from anal verge, with or without a diverting ostomy -- was undertaken. Temporary diverting stomas were utilized at the discretion of the attending surgeon primarily based on subjective criteria. The main outcome was postoperative complications. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Forty-nine patients (78% preoperatively irradiated) were treated with a one-stage operation, whereas 17 (53% preoperatively irradiated) underwent reconstruction with proximal diversion. The mean anastomotic height for patients with a single stage procedure was 3.8 cm above the anal verge versus 2.6 for patients with a two-stage procedure (p = 0.076). Complication rates were lower in patients who did not undergo diversion (29% vs 47%, p = 16). With regard to anastomotic-associated complications for single stage versus two stage, complication rates were 8% versus 18%, respectively (p = 0.27). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSION: Low pelvic anastomoses in rectal cancer patients can be safely performed as a single-stage procedure, reserving the use of diversion for select cases.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Anal Canal/surgery , Colon/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Surgical Stomas , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Anastomosis, Surgical , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Stomas/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Surg Technol Int ; 15: 95-101, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17029168

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive surgery has undergone rapid development over the last 20 years and has greatly impacted the field of General Surgery. Removal of the appendix and gallbladder by way of laparoscopic means has become standard in surgical training and care. More complex procedures also are becoming incorporated into surgical resident education and routine clinical practice. Colon cancer operations, previously performed by an open approach to ensure adequate resection of the specimen and draining lymph nodes, are currently being performed laparoscopically by experienced surgeons with equivalent recurrence, morbidity, and overall mortality rates. In this chapter, the technique of laparoscopic colectomy is described and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The literature is reviewed and this technique compared with the open procedure. The authors contend that laparoscopic colectomy is a suitable, and perhaps preferable, alternative to open procedures for benign or malignant colon disease, with acceptable long-term results.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/instrumentation , Colectomy/methods , Laparoscopes , Laparoscopy/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Technology Assessment, Biomedical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...