Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(1-2): 39-43, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26246455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has become the standard of care for small renal tumours, with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) being superseded by minimally invasive PN. Advances in minimal access surgery have resulted in fewer relative contraindications, with subsequently fewer OPN being performed. Consequentially, trainees have less opportunity to gain skills and experience in open renal surgery. The aims of this study were to assess the standard of OPN performed by Australian urological trainees and to define whether OPN is a safe and suitable training opportunity. METHOD: A retrospective review was undertaken on patients who underwent OPN performed by urology trainees from 2010 to 2014 at two training hospitals in Western Australia. Data collected included patient demographics, surgical and oncological outcomes and morbidity. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent OPN, with a mean age of 56 years. Most tumours were single, with mean size 31 mm. Mean operative time was 157 min, with a mean cold ischaemic time of 27 min. Mean pre- and post-operative creatinine levels were equivalent (77 µmol/L). The overall complication rate was 18%, with no documented urinary leaks, and 1.7% blood transfusion rate. Median length of stay was 4 days. There were no oncological positive margins or recurrence after a median follow-up of 2 years. CONCLUSION: Our data support the notion that Australian urological trainees can perform the majority of OPN cases, with equivalent oncological outcomes. We would advocate that when an OPN is being performed, the supervising consultant should use the case as an adjuvant for open renal surgery training.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/education , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/standards , Nephrectomy/education , Nephrectomy/standards , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Western Australia
2.
Rev Urol ; 13(3): 119-30, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22114545

ABSTRACT

Lower urinary tract trauma, although relatively uncommon in blunt trauma, can lead to significant morbidity when diagnosed late or left untreated; urologists may only encounter a handful of these injuries in their career. This article reviews the literature and reports on the management of these injuries, highlighting the issues facing clinicians in this subspecialty. Also presented is a structured review detailing the mechanisms, classification, diagnosis, management, and complications of blunt trauma to the bladder and urethra. The prognosis for bladder rupture is excellent when treated. Significant intraperitoneal rupture or involvement of the bladder neck mandates surgical repair, whereas smaller extraperitoneal lacerations may be managed with catheterization alone. With the push for management of trauma patients in larger centers, urologists in these hospitals are seeing increasing numbers of lower urinary tract injuries. Prospective analysis may be achieved in these centers to address the current lack of Level 1 evidence.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...