ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study investigated the effects of different postrinsing times and methods on the surface roughness, surface hardness, and degree of polymerization of materials manufactured via stereolithography (SLA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 288 disk-shaped specimens were manufactured using an SLA three-dimensional (3D) printer. The specimens were randomly divided into nine groups (n = 32) based on rinsing times and methods. The groups were categorized into three rinsing methods: automated, ultrasonic, and hand washing, with rinsing times of 5, 10, and 15 minutes using a 99% isopropanol alcohol as a solvent. Linear roughness (Ra) and area roughness (Sa) were measured using a 3D confocal laser microscopy; the roughness morphology was evaluated by using scanning electron microscopy. Vickers hardness (VHN) tests were performed using a Vickers microhardness tester. Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry was used to determine the degree of conversion of treated specimens. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance. The post hoc Tukey tests were conducted to compare the differences between groups (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The choice of the rinsing time and method affected the surface properties of the SLA photopolymer resin. The 15 minutes of ultrasonic method exhibited the highest Ra scores (0.86 ± 0.1 µm), while the 15 minutes of automated method presented the highest Sa scores (1.77 ± 0.35 µm). For the VHN test, the 15 minutes of ultrasonic method displayed the highest VHN score (18.26 ± 1.03 kgf/mm2). For the degree of polymerization, the 15 minutes of automated method was initially identified as the most effective (87.22 ± 6.80). CONCLUSION: To facilitate the overall surface roughness, surface hardness, and degree of polymerization, the optimal choice of postprocessing rinsing time and method for achieving a clear photopolymer resin was determined to be the ultrasonic method with a rinsing time of 15 minutes.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study developed a new skin-deproteinized natural rubber latex (DNRL) silicone adhesive for adhering to silicone prostheses and compared the properties with a commercial Daro-Hydrobond adhesive. Materials and methods: The new DNRL skin adhesive formulation was made from non-vulcanized natural rubber-based adhesives consisting of DNRL, 20% polyvinyl alcohol, cumarone resin, 2% methylcellulose, and Wingstay L. The peel bond strength of the adhesives was tested using a 90-degree peel test. Biocompatibility was accessed using in vitro keratinocyte cell viability. Animals (rabbits) and humans were tested for skin irritation tests. Results were analyzed using SPSS Version 24 and compared between the two adhesives. Results: The peel bond strength of the new DNRL skin adhesive was 103.61 ± 23.18 N/m whereas that of the Daro-hydrobond adhesive was 131.52 ± 21.72 N/m. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the peel bond strengths of the two test adhesives. Cell proliferation under the DNRL skin adhesive-soaked medium showed higher cell viability than the positive control (p<0.05). The DNRL skin adhesive produced moderate erythema and edema on rabbit skins, however, the skin lesions recovered within 14 days. Two volunteers showed mild irritation at the first hour of the contact which was reduced within an hour without any therapy. The patient satisfaction with the DNRL skin adhesive ranged from slightly satisfied to completely satisfied. Conclusion: The new DNRL skin adhesive showed comparable peel bond strength and patient satisfaction to those of commercial adhesives. The adhesive was biocompatible and can be used carefully.
