Age versus comorbidities as risk factors for complications after elective abdominal aortic reconstructive surgery.

PURPOSE: This study estimated the association between age and in-hospital postoperative complications, controlling for known or suspected risk factors, in a series of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic reconstructive surgery (AAR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of outcome data with multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted at Emory University Hospital, a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital. All patients undergoing elective AAR between Jan 1, 1986, and Aug 1, 1996, were included (n = 856). An estimate of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for the association between patient age and in-hospital major morbidity or mortality after elective AAR was made, controlling for significant risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 856 patients, 170 had a nonfatal complication (136 with major and 34 with minor complications), and 11 patients (1.3%) died. The final logistic regression model demonstrated a mild association between increasing age and rate of major postoperative complications, including death (for each increase in age of 10 years: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00-1.52; P =.052). Other significant covariates in the final model included cardiac disease (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.18-6.86; P =.020), pulmonary disease (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.35-2.84; P =.0004), and renal disease (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.66-3.99; P =.0001). Increasing age was associated with a moderate increase in the rate of death (for each increase in age of 10 years: OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.16; P =.015) in a model with cardiac disease as the only significant covariate (OR, 14.67; 95% CI, 3.46-62.16; P =.0003). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing elective AAR, increasing patient age is associated with a small increase in risk for in-hospital morbidity or mortality. However, significant cardiac, pulmonary, or renal disease is associated with a much greater risk of postoperative complications, and, therefore, advanced age should not be the sole basis of exclusion for otherwise suitable candidates for elective AAR.

Ambulatory endovascular surgery: cost advantage and factors influencing its safe performance.

PURPOSE: To perform a retrospective analysis of chronic limb ischemia and determine whether endovascular surgery can be performed safely and cost effectively on an ambulatory basis. METHODS: Among 42 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for lower limb ischemia over a 12-month period ending October 1997, 32 (18 men, mean age 68 years, range 44 to 89) were treated solely by endovascular interventions. These patients were grouped according to time inhospital: 20 (63%) patients had endovascular procedures performed on an ambulatory basis, 7 (22%) were hospitalized for > 24 hours, and 5 (16%) required an overnight stay. The angioplasty procedures, which included placement of 21 stents, were performed in the abdominal aorta (n = 1) and the common iliac (n = 9), external iliac (n =7), superficial femoral (n = 11), popliteal (n = 5), tibioperoneal (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 1) arteries. Hospital charges were compared for the 3 groups. RESULTS: Other than the presence of coronary artery disease, there were no significant differences in demographics or risk factors among the 3 groups. Angioplasty was technically successful in all patients, and there were no procedural complications. Patients with tissue loss required hospitalization more frequently compared to those with claudication. Significantly more patients who were hospitalized had epidural anesthesia as opposed to local when compared to the ambulatory group, 43% versus 5%, respectively (p = 0.04). Excluding professional fees, mean total hospital cost differed significantly between the ambulatory group and the group of patients with a hospital stay > 24 hours ($8227 versus $40,383, respectively; p = 0.03) and between the 2 hospitalized groups ($9476 for overnight stay versus $40,383 for > 24-hour stay, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral endovascular interventions can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis resulting in decreased hospital cost. Patients who receive epidural anesthesia, require concomitant open vascular reconstruction, present with tissue loss, or have unstable medical conditions are more likely to require hospitalization.

Autogenic tooth transplantation. The "state of the art".

With proper case selection and technique, autogenic tooth transplantation can be a viable treatment modality. The authors present a number of transplant cases and suggest the procedure be considered as an adjunct in orthodontic treatment planning. A comprehensive review of the literature, combined with the authors' opinions and clinical demonstrations, has culminated in a discussion of indications and contraindications, special considerations, optimal timing, technique, and prognosis. It is thought that appropriate utilization can simplify or eliminate prosthetic requirements, reduce the complexity of many orthodontic treatment plans, and convert into routine certain cases heretofore thought to be inoperable.