Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplant Proc ; 54(6): 1455-1464, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35489983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune responses to seasonal endemic coronaviruses might have a pivotal role in protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Those SARS-CoV-2-crossreactive T cells were recently described in immunocompetent individuals. Still, data on cross-reactive humoral and cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients is currently lacking. METHODS: The pre-existing, cross-reactive antibody B and T cell immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in unexposed adults with kidney transplantation (Tx, n = 14) and without (non-Tx, n = 12) sampled before the pandemic were compared with 22 convalescent patients with COVID-19 (Cp) applying enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry. RESULTS: In both unexposed groups, SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were not detectable. Memory B cells binding spike (S) protein SARS-CoV-2 were detected in unexposed individuals (64% among Tx; 50% among non-Tx) and higher frequencies after infection (80% Cp). The numbers of SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells were comparable between patients who had undergone Tx and those who had not. SARS-CoV-2-reactive follicular T helper cells were present in 61% of the unexposed cohort in both patients who had undergone Tx and those who had not. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-reactive memory B and T cells against SARS-CoV-2 exist also in transplanted adults, suggesting a primed adaptive immunity. The effect on the disease course may depend on the concomitant immunosuppressive drugs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Mol Ther ; 28(12): 2691-2702, 2020 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33186542

ABSTRACT

Preventing the progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 is an unsolved challenge. The involvement of T cell immunity in this exacerbation remains unclear. To identify predictive markers of COVID-19 progress and outcome, we analyzed peripheral blood of 10 COVID-19-associated ARDS patients and 35 mild/moderate COVID-19 patients, not requiring intensive care. Using multi-parametric flow cytometry, we compared quantitative, phenotypic, and functional characteristics of circulating bulk immune cells, as well as SARS-CoV-2 S-protein-reactive T cells between the two groups. ARDS patients demonstrated significantly higher S-protein-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compared to non-ARDS patients. Of interest, comparison of circulating bulk T cells in ARDS patients to non-ARDS patients demonstrated decreased frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, with activated memory/effector T cells expressing tissue migration molecule CD11a++. Importantly, survival from ARDS (4/10) was accompanied by a recovery of the CD11a++ T cell subsets in peripheral blood. Conclusively, data on S-protein-reactive polyfunctional T cells indicate the ability of ARDS patients to generate antiviral protection. Furthermore, decreased frequencies of activated memory/effector T cells expressing tissue migratory molecule CD11a++ observed in circulation of ARDS patients might suggest their involvement in ARDS development and propose the CD11a-based immune signature as a possible prognostic marker.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Immunologic Memory/immunology , Pandemics , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/immunology , Adult , Aged , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins/immunology , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/pathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Vitronectin
3.
Cell Rep Med ; 1(6): 100092, 2020 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904468

ABSTRACT

T cell immunity toward SARS-CoV-2 spike (S-), membrane (M-), and nucleocapsid (N-) proteins may define COVID-19 severity. Therefore, we compare the SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell responses in moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 patients and unexposed donors. Overlapping peptide pools of all three proteins induce SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell response with dominance of CD4+ over CD8+ T cells and demonstrate interindividual immunity against the three proteins. M-protein induces the highest frequencies of CD4+ T cells, suggesting its relevance for diagnosis and vaccination. The T cell response of critical COVID-19 patients is robust and comparable or even superior to non-critical patients. Virus clearance and COVID-19 survival are not associated with either SARS-CoV-2 T cell kinetics or magnitude of T cell responses, respectively. Thus, our data do not support the hypothesis of insufficient SARS-CoV-2-reactive immunity in critical COVID-19. Conversely, it indicates that activation of differentiated memory effector T cells could cause hyperreactivity and immunopathogenesis in critical patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Coronavirus M Proteins/immunology , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Convalescence , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphoproteins/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...