Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 7(2): e30319, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22363425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (ARE) has emerged as a nosocomial pathogen. Here, we quantified ARE carriage in different community sources and determined genetic relatedness with hospital ARE. METHODS AND RESULTS: ARE was recovered from rectal swabs of 24 of 79 (30%) dogs, 11 of 85 (13%) cats and 0 of 42 horses and from 3 of 40 (8%) faecal samples of non-hospitalized humans receiving amoxicillin. Multi-locus Sequence Typing revealed 21 sequence types (STs), including 5 STs frequently associated with hospital-acquired infections. Genes previously found to be enriched in hospital ARE, such as IS16, orf903, orf905, orf907, were highly prevalent in community ARE (≥79%), while genes with a proposed role in pathogenesis, such as esp, hyl and ecbA, were found rarely (≤5%) in community isolates. Comparative genome analysis of 2 representative dog isolates revealed that the dog strain of ST192 was evolutionarily closely linked to two previously sequenced hospital ARE, but had, based on gene content, more genes in common with the other, evolutionarily more distantly related, dog strain (ST266). CONCLUSION: ARE were detected in dogs, cats and sporadically in healthy humans, with evolutionary linkage to hospital ARE. Yet, their accessory genome has diversified, probably as a result of niche adaptation.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/genetics , Ampicillin/pharmacology , Biological Evolution , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Hospitals , Residence Characteristics , Adaptation, Physiological/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Cats , Dogs , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Enterococcus faecium/pathogenicity , Genes, Bacterial/genetics , Genetic Variation/drug effects , Horses , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Phylogeny , Virulence/drug effects , Virulence/genetics
2.
Br J Nutr ; 103(10): 1452-60, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20021703

ABSTRACT

Short-term antibiotic treatment profoundly affects the intestinal microbiota, which may lead to sustained changes in microbiota composition. Probiotics may restore such a disturbance. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of a multispecies probiotic on the faecal microbiota during and after antibiotic intake in patients with a history of frequent antibiotic use. In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, thirty chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients treated with antibiotics for a respiratory tract infection received 5 g of a multispecies probiotic or placebo twice daily for 2 weeks. Faecal samples were collected at 0, 7, 14 and 63 d. Changes in the composition of the dominant faecal microbiota were determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Changes in bacterial subgroups were determined by quantitative PCR and culture. Bowel movements were scored daily according to the Bristol stool form scale. During and after antibiotic treatment, DGGE-based similarity indices (SI) were high ( >/= 84 %) and band richness was relatively low, both remaining stable over time. No difference in SI was observed between patients with and without diarrhoea-like bowel movements. The multispecies probiotic had a modest effect on the bacterial subgroups. Nevertheless, it affected neither the composition of the dominant faecal microbiota nor the occurrence of diarrhoea-like bowel movements. The dominant faecal microbiota was not affected by antibiotics in this COPD population, suggesting an existing imbalance of the microbiota, which may also have contributed to the lack of effect by probiotic intake.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Defecation/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Probiotics/pharmacology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Double-Blind Method , Endotoxins/analysis , Feces/chemistry , Fungi/isolation & purification , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
3.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 103(1): 178-89, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17900321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the side effects of antimicrobial therapy is a disturbance of the intestinal microbiota potentially resulting in antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). In this placebo-controlled double-blind study, the effect of a multispecies probiotic on the composition and metabolic activity of the intestinal microbiota and bowel habits was studied in healthy volunteers taking amoxycillin. METHODS: Forty-one healthy volunteers were given 500 mg amoxycillin twice daily for 7 days and were randomized to either 5 g of a multispecies probiotic, Ecologic AAD (10(9) cfu/g), or placebo, twice daily for 14 days. Feces and questionnaires were collected on day 0, 7, 14, and 63. Feces was analyzed as to the composition of the intestinal microbiota, and beta-glucosidase activity, endotoxin concentration, Clostridium difficile toxin A, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and pH were determined. Bowel movements were scored according to the Bristol stool form scale. RESULTS: Mean number of enterococci increased significantly from log 4.1 at day 0 to log 5.8 (day 7) and log 6.9 (day 14) cfu/g feces (P < 0.05) during probiotic intake. Although no other significant differences were observed between both intervention groups, within each group significant changes were found over time in both microbial composition and metabolic activity. Moreover, bowel movements with a frequency >or=3 per day for at least 2 days and/or a consistency >or=5 for at least 2 days were reported less frequently in the probiotic compared to the placebo group (48%vs 79%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from an increase in enterococci no significant differences in microbial composition and metabolic activity were observed in the probiotic compared with the placebo group. However, changes over time were present in both groups, which differed significantly between the probiotic and the placebo arm, suggesting that the amoxycillin effect was modulated by probiotic intake. Moreover, the intake of a multispecies probiotic significantly reduced diarrhea-like bowel movements in healthy volunteers receiving amoxycillin.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bacteria/growth & development , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , Defecation/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intestines/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Reference Values , beta-Glucosidase/metabolism
4.
Clin Nutr ; 26(4): 450-9, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17544549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the potential for probiotics is investigated in an increasing variety of diseases, there is little or no consensus regarding the desired probiotic properties for a particular disease in question, nor about the final design of the probiotic. Specific strain selection procedures were undertaken to design a disease-specific multispecies probiotic. METHODS: From a strain collection of 69 different lactic acid bacteria a primary selection was made of 14 strains belonging to different species showing superior survival in a simulated gastrointestinal environment. Functional tests like antimicrobial activity against a range of clinical isolates and cytokine inducing capacity in cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used to further identify potential strains. RESULTS: Specific strains inhibited growth of clinical isolates whereas others superiorly induced the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Based on functional tests and general criteria regarding probiotic design and safety, a selection of the following six strains was made (Ecologic 641); Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactococcus lactis. Combination of these strains resulted in a wider antimicrobial spectrum, superior induction of IL-10 and silencing of pro-inflammatory cytokines as compared to the individual components. CONCLUSIONS: Application of strict criteria during the design of a disease-specific probiotic prior to implementation in clinical trials may provide a rational basis for use of probiotics.


Subject(s)
Antibiosis , Bifidobacterium/physiology , Cytokines/biosynthesis , Inflammation/prevention & control , Lactobacillus/physiology , Probiotics , Bifidobacterium/growth & development , Bifidobacterium/immunology , Coculture Techniques , Critical Illness/therapy , Cytokines/immunology , Humans , Lactobacillus/growth & development , Lactobacillus/immunology , Species Specificity , Time Factors , Tissue Culture Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...