Does severe toxicity affect global quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during palliative systemic treatment? A systematic review.

Background: New palliative systemic treatment regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have significantly improved overall survival and prognosis. These treatment regimens are often accompanied by increased toxicity, which may impair patients' quality of life (QOL). We systematically reviewed whether severe toxicity affects global QOL in patients with mCRC receiving palliative systemic treatment in recent published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Materials and methods: Phase III RCTs evaluating palliative systemic treatments in patients with mCRC and published between 2004 and 2016 were considered. Studies were evaluated on the basis of global QOL scores, toxicity during treatment (assessed by scoring relevant adverse events) and primary outcomes (POs). Results: A total of 30 studies were identified in which 19863 patients were included. In 25 out of these 30 trials (83%), no difference in global QOL between treatment arms was observed. In contrast, 22 out of 30 trials (73%) showed increased toxicity during treatment in the experimental arm as compared with the control arm. In 19 out of 22 trials with higher toxicity (86%) global QOL outcomes remained unaffected or improved. In ten out of eleven studies with a better PO, no improvement in global QOL was seen. Conclusion: Global QOL of patients with mCRC included in phase III RCTs evaluating palliative systemic treatment did not differ across treatment arms despite consistently higher toxicity during treatment of the experimental compared with the standard treatment arms. Based on these findings we conclude that the use of global QOL for comparing treatment arms in RCTs for patients with mCRC does not provide information of clinical relevance. Further consideration of how to better assess the net effect of new agents on patients' QOL is urgently needed.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor JNJ-26483327 in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: JNJ-26483327 is an oral, potent, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibiting kinases of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-1, -2 and -4, rearranged during transfection (RET) receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and Src family (Lyn, Fyn, Yes) at low nanomolar concentrations. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of JNJ-26483327. METHODS: Nineteen patients with advanced cancers received JNJ-26483327 continuous twice daily (BID) in escalating dose cohorts ranging from 100 to 2100 mg. Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in paired skin biopsies and blood. RESULTS: JNJ-26483327 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg BID, with target-inhibition-related toxicity such as diarrhoea and skin rash, and other common reported toxicities being nausea, vomiting, anorexia and fatigue. At 2100 mg, two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed, consisting of grade 3 anorexia and a combination of grade 3 anorexia and fatigue, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional up to 1500 mg in which plasma levels were obtained showing anti-tumour activity in xenograft mouse models. Pharmacodynamic analysis did not show a substantial effect on expression of Ki-67, p27(kip1), phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphorylated Akt and EGFR, and serum levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-C and VEGF-D remained unchanged. Stable disease was noted in six patients (32%). CONCLUSION: JNJ-26483327 is well tolerated and shows a predictable pharmacokinetic profile; the recommended dose for further studies is 1500 mg BID.

The applicability of mTOR inhibition in solid tumors.

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin-pathway (PI3K/AKT/mTOR-pathway) plays a role in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell survival, angiogenesis and resistance to anti-tumor treatments. In many tumor types the PI3K/AKT/mTOR-pathway is found activated through several different underlying mechanisms. Since this pathway is believed to largely drive the malignant behavior of several of these tumors, mTOR-inhibition is considered an attractive means to apply as anti-tumor treatment. Currently, four mTOR-inhibitors are explored for clinical use: rapamycin, temsirolimus (CCI-779), everolimus (RAD001) and deforolimus (AP23573). As monotherapy, mTOR-inhibitors yield interesting anti-tumor activity against various tumor types at the expense of relatively mild toxicities. This recently resulted in the registration of two mTOR-inhibitors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) while randomized studies in other tumors are currently in progress. Furthermore, mTOR-inhibitors are well-suited drugs to combine with other anti-tumor drugs as in preclinical models mTOR-inhibition overcomes chemoresistance. Consequently, mTOR-inhibitor-containing multidrug regimens are subject to clinical studies. As holds true for all anti-tumor therapies, identification of patients who are likely to respond to mTOR-inhibitor-containing therapies is of utmost importance to avoid over- or undertreatment. Preliminary results suggest that several factors reflecting activation of mTOR in tumors may be used for this purpose. This review addresses the mechanism of action and current clinical experience with mTOR-inhibitors as well as their role in overcoming resistance to conventional therapies. Additionally, potential predictors of outcome to mTOR-inhibition are discussed.