Comparison of the Fixation Strengths of Screws between the Traditional Trajectory and the Single and Double Endplate Penetrating Screw Trajectories Using Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Models Based on the Finite Element Method.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a finite element (FE) study. PURPOSE: To compare the fixation strength of traditional trajectory (TT) and single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories (SEPST/DEPST) to the osteoporotic vertebral body model based on the FE method. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: SEPST/DEPST have been developed to enhance the fixation strength in patients with diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis (DISH). This technique was also applied to patients with osteoporosis. However, determining the superiority of SEPST/ DEPST is difficult because of the heterogeneous patient backgrounds. METHODS: Twenty vertebrae (T12 and L1) from 10 patients with osteoporosis (two males and eight females; mean age, 74.7 years) were obtained to create the 10 FE models. First, a single screw was placed with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation strength was compared by axial pullout strength (POS) and multidirectional loading tests. Second, two screws were placed on the bilateral pedicles with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation force of the vertebrae in the constructs in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation was examined. RESULTS: SEPST and DEPST had 140% and 171% higher POS values than TT, respectively, and the DEPST result was statistically significant (p =0.007). The multidirectional fixation strength was significantly higher in DEPST and SEPST than in TT in the cranial, caudal, and medial directions (p <0.05) but not in the lateral direction (p =0.05). The vertebral fracture strength at the lower instrumented vertebra of the DEPST tended to be higher than that of TT. The vertebral motion angles in SEPST and DEPST were significantly smaller in lateral bending (p =0.02) and tended to be smaller in flexion and extension than in TT (p =0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This study may provide useful information for spine surgeons in deciding whether to choose the SEPS or DEPS technique for augmenting fixation in osteoporotic vertebral fracture surgery.

Evaluation of intraoperative coronal alignment using a computer-assisted rod bending system (CARBS) without intraoperative radiation exposure in adult spinal deformity surgery: a technical note and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiographs and fluoroscopy are used in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery to prevent postoperative coronal malalignment but with limited accuracy. Therefore, we applied a computer-assisted rod bending system (CARBS: Bendini®) for an intraoperative coronal alignment evaluation. The purpose of this study is to introduce this novel technique and validate its accuracy. METHODS: Fifteen ASD patients were included in the study. The heads of the bilateral S1 pedicle screws (S1), the S1 spinous process, and the bilateral greater trochanter (GT) and the C7 spinous process were recorded with CARBS for an intraoperative coronal alignment evaluation. The lines which connect the bilateral S1 and GT were used as references. The C7-center sacral vertical line (C7-CSVL) on the CARBS monitor was checked, and the C7-CSVL from the intraoperative CARBS recording and postoperative standing whole spine radiograph were compared. RESULTS: Intraoperative C7-CSVL with CARBS was 35.1 ± 31.6 mm when the S1 pedicle screws were used as the reference line and was 16.6 ± 17.8 mm when the GTs were used. Postoperative C7-CSVL by radiograph was 15.1 ± 16.5 mm. In addition, the intraoperative C7-CSVL with CARBS and the postoperative C7-CSVL showed a strong positive correlation in both GT (R = 0.86, p < 0.01) and in S1(R = 0.79, p < 0.01), with a better correlation found in GT than in S1. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative C7-CSVL with CARBS was found to be highly accurate in ASD surgery. Our results suggest that this novel technique can be useful as an alternative to intraoperative radiography and fluoroscopy and may reduce radiation exposure.

Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure.

The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above-two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above-two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above-two below fixation (p = 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above-two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.