Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J ; 23: 2289-2303, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840832

ABSTRACT

The rapid progression of genomics and proteomics has been driven by the advent of advanced sequencing technologies, large, diverse, and readily available omics datasets, and the evolution of computational data processing capabilities. The vast amount of data generated by these advancements necessitates efficient algorithms to extract meaningful information. K-mers serve as a valuable tool when working with large sequencing datasets, offering several advantages in computational speed and memory efficiency and carrying the potential for intrinsic biological functionality. This review provides an overview of the methods, applications, and significance of k-mers in genomic and proteomic data analyses, as well as the utility of absent sequences, including nullomers and nullpeptides, in disease detection, vaccine development, therapeutics, and forensic science. Therefore, the review highlights the pivotal role of k-mers in addressing current genomic and proteomic problems and underscores their potential for future breakthroughs in research.

2.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J ; 23: 1919-1928, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711760

ABSTRACT

The decrease in sequencing expenses has facilitated the creation of reference genomes and proteomes for an expanding array of organisms. Nevertheless, no established repository that details organism-specific genomic and proteomic sequences of specific lengths, referred to as kmers, exists to our knowledge. In this article, we present kmerDB, a database accessible through an interactive web interface that provides kmer-based information from genomic and proteomic sequences in a systematic way. kmerDB currently contains 202,340,859,107 base pairs and 19,304,903,356 amino acids, spanning 54,039 and 21,865 reference genomes and proteomes, respectively, as well as 6,905,362 and 149,305,183 genomic and proteomic species-specific sequences, termed quasi-primes. Additionally, we provide access to 5,186,757 nucleic and 214,904,089 peptide sequences absent from every genome and proteome, termed primes. kmerDB features a user-friendly interface offering various search options and filters for easy parsing and searching. The service is available at: www.kmerdb.com.

3.
NAR Genom Bioinform ; 6(2): lqae029, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584871

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of nucleic and peptide short sequences across organismal genomes and proteomes has not been thoroughly investigated. We examined 45 785 reference genomes and 21 871 reference proteomes, spanning archaea, bacteria, eukaryotes and viruses to calculate the rarity of short sequences in them. To capture this, we developed a metric of the rarity of each sequence in nature, the rarity index. We find that the frequency of certain dipeptides in rare oligopeptide sequences is hundreds of times lower than expected, which is not the case for any dinucleotides. We also generate predictive regression models that infer the rarity of nucleic and proteomic sequences across nature or within each domain of life and viruses separately. When examining each of the three domains of life and viruses separately, the R² performance of the model predicting rarity for 5-mer peptides from mono- and dipeptides ranged between 0.814 and 0.932. A separate model predicting rarity for 10-mer oligonucleotides from mono- and dinucleotides achieved R² performance between 0.408 and 0.606. Our results indicate that the mono- and dinucleotide composition of nucleic sequences and the mono- and dipeptide composition of peptide sequences can explain a significant proportion of the variance in their frequencies in nature.

4.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38045264

ABSTRACT

Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) represent a set of high-throughput technologies that measure the functional effects of thousands of sequences/variants on gene regulatory activity. There are several different variations of MPRA technology and they are used for numerous applications, including regulatory element discovery, variant effect measurement, saturation mutagenesis, synthetic regulatory element generation or characterization of evolutionary gene regulatory differences. Despite their many designs and uses, there is no comprehensive database that incorporates the results of these experiments. To address this, we developed MPRAbase, a manually curated database that currently harbors 129 experiments, encompassing 17,718,677 elements tested across 35 cell types and 4 organisms. The MPRAbase web interface (http://www.mprabase.com) serves as a centralized user-friendly repository to download existing MPRA data for independent analysis and is designed with the ability to allow researchers to share their published data for rapid dissemination to the community.

5.
BMC Genomics ; 24(1): 768, 2023 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087204

ABSTRACT

Early detection of human disease is associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, many diseases are often detected at an advanced, symptomatic stage where patients are past efficacious treatment periods and can result in less favorable outcomes. Therefore, methods that can accurately detect human disease at a presymptomatic stage are urgently needed. Here, we introduce "frequentmers"; short sequences that are specific and recurrently observed in either patient or healthy control samples, but not in both. We showcase the utility of frequentmers for the detection of liver cirrhosis using metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing data from stool samples of patients and controls. We develop classification models for the detection of liver cirrhosis and achieve an AUC score of 0.91 using ten-fold cross-validation. A small subset of 200 frequentmers can achieve comparable results in detecting liver cirrhosis. Finally, we identify the microbial organisms in liver cirrhosis samples, which are associated with the most predictive frequentmer biomarkers.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Liver Cirrhosis , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/genetics , Health Status , Metagenome , Metagenomics , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
HSS J ; 19(1): 97-106, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36776512

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) have hip strength deficits, instability, and increased risk for concomitant injury. While surgical intervention is an effective method of treatment for FAI, more information is needed about the recovery process. Purposes: We sought to understand how patients with FAI recover from surgical correction in the short term. Do patients' perceptions of improvement correspond with measured improvements in hip strength? Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 17 patients (11 male, age range: 16-38 years) who were diagnosed with symptomatic FAI at a single surgeon's practice. Hip strength (flexion, extension, and abduction) was measured preoperatively and at 14, 26, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Osteoarthritis Score (HOOS) subscales were measured at the same time points and at 2 weeks postoperatively. Results: Compared with preoperative values, there was a significant increase in postoperative values at 26 and 52 weeks in normalized isokinetic hip extension (29% and 38%, respectively) and normalized hip abduction (48% and 55%, respectively). No differences in strength were observed at 14 weeks. Modified Harris Hip Score and all HOOS subscales were decreased by 2 weeks postoperatively, and by 14 weeks mHHS improved by 21%, and HOOS subscales improved as well (activities of daily living by 18%, pain by 34%, quality of life by 69%, sport and recreation by 36%, and symptoms by 28%). Conclusion: We observed that patient-reported outcomes including symptoms, function, and satisfaction improved at 14 weeks, while objective measures of hip strength improved at 26 weeks following surgical correction of FAI. More rigorous study is indicated.

7.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 24(1): 68, 2022 03 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277196

ABSTRACT

Histopathology is widely used to analyze clinical biopsy specimens and tissues from pre-clinical models of a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Histological assessment relies on scoring systems that require expertise, time, and resources, which can lead to an analysis bottleneck. Recent advancements in digital imaging and image processing provide an opportunity to automate histological analyses by implementing advanced statistical models such as machine learning and deep learning, which would greatly benefit the musculoskeletal field. This review provides a high-level overview of machine learning applications, a general pipeline of tissue collection to model selection, and highlights the development of image analysis methods, including some machine learning applications, to solve musculoskeletal problems. We discuss the optimization steps for tissue processing, sectioning, staining, and imaging that are critical for the successful generalizability of an automated image analysis model. We also commenting on the considerations that should be taken into account during model selection and the considerable advances in the field of computer vision outside of histopathology, which can be leveraged for image analysis. Finally, we provide a historic perspective of the previously used histopathological image analysis applications for musculoskeletal diseases, and we contrast it with the advantages of implementing state-of-the-art computational pathology approaches. While some deep learning approaches have been used, there is a significant opportunity to expand the use of such approaches to solve musculoskeletal problems.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
8.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 12: 21514593211040611, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34522445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic had a devastating effect on New York City in the spring of 2020. Several global reports suggested worse early outcomes among COVID-positive patients with hip fractures. However, there is limited data comparing baseline comorbidities among patients treated during the pandemic relative to those treated in non-pandemic conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed at two Level 1 Trauma centers and one orthopedic specialty hospital to assess demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 67 hip fracture patients treated (OTA/AO 31, 32.1) during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City (March 20, 2020 to April 24, 2020), including 9 who were diagnosed with COVID-19. These patients were compared to a cohort of 76 hip fracture patients treated 1 year prior (March 20, 2019 to April 24, 2019). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, treatment characteristics, and respiratory symptomatology were evaluated. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Relative to patients treated in 2019, patients with hip fractures during the pandemic had worse Charlson Comorbidity Indices (median 5.0 vs 6.0, P = .03) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (mean 2.4 vs 2.7, P = .04). Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to have decreased ambulatory status (P<.01) and a smoking history (P = .04). Patients in 2020 had longer inpatient stays (median 5 vs 7 days, P = .01), and were more likely to be discharged home (61% vs 9%, P<.01). Inpatient mortality was significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (12% vs 0%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic had worse comorbidity profiles and decreased functional status compared to patients treated the year prior. This information may be relevant in negotiations regarding reimbursement for cost of care of hip fracture patients with COVID-19, as these patients may require more expensive care.

9.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(14): 1197-1204, 2020 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675661

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging pandemic disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although the majority of patients who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, some patients develop severe symptoms that can permanently detract from their quality of life. SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV-1, which causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Both viruses infect the respiratory system, and there are direct and indirect effects of this infection on multiple organ systems, including the musculoskeletal system. Epidemiological data from the SARS pandemic of 2002 to 2004 identified myalgias, muscle dysfunction, osteoporosis, and osteonecrosis as common sequelae in patients with moderate and severe forms of this disease. Early studies have indicated that there is also considerable musculoskeletal dysfunction in some patients with COVID-19, although long-term follow-up studies have not yet been conducted. The purpose of this article was to summarize the known musculoskeletal pathologies in patients with SARS or COVID-19 and to combine this with computational modeling and biochemical signaling studies to predict musculoskeletal cellular targets and long-term consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Musculoskeletal System/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Betacoronavirus , Bone and Bones/physiopathology , COVID-19 , Computer Simulation , Humans , Joints/physiopathology , Muscle Weakness/virology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Myalgia/virology , Pandemics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics
10.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(16): 1379-1388, 2020 08 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long incubation period and asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 present considerable challenges for health-care institutions. The identification of infected individuals is vital to prevent the spread of illness to staff and other patients as well as to identify those who may be at risk for disease-related complications. This is particularly relevant with the resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery around the world. We report the results of a universal testing protocol for COVID-19 in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery during the coronavirus pandemic and to describe the postoperative course of asymptomatic patients who were positive for COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult operative cases between March 25, 2020, and April 24, 2020, at an orthopaedic specialty hospital in New York City was performed. Initially, a screening questionnaire consisting of relevant signs and symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, shortness of breath) or exposure dictated the need for nasopharyngeal swab real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for all admitted patients. An institutional policy change occurred on April 5, 2020, that indicated nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR testing for all orthopaedic admissions. Screening and testing data for COVID-19 as well as relevant imaging, laboratory values, and postoperative complications were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: From April 5, 2020, to April 24, 2020, 99 patients underwent routine nasopharyngeal swab testing for COVID-19 prior to their planned orthopaedic surgical procedure. Of the 12.1% of patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 58.3% were asymptomatic. Three asymptomatic patients developed postoperative hypoxia, with 2 requiring intubation. The negative predictive value of using the signs and symptoms of disease to predict a negative test result was 91.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0% to 97.1%). Including a positive chest radiographic finding as a screening criterion did not improve the negative predictive value of screening (92.5% [95% CI, 81.8% to 97.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol for universal testing of all orthopaedic surgery admissions at 1 hospital in New York City during a 3-week period revealed a high rate of COVID-19 infections. Importantly, the majority of these patients were asymptomatic. Using chest radiography did not significantly improve the negative predictive value of screening. These results have important implications as hospitals anticipate the resumption of elective surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , Clinical Protocols , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Symptom Assessment
11.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(8): 403-410, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482977

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inpatient outcomes among patients with hip fracture treated during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One Level 1 trauma center and one orthopaedic specialty hospital in New York City. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (average age 85 years, range: 65-100 years) treated for a hip fracture (OTA/AO 31, 32.1) over a 5-week period, March 20, 2020, to April 24, 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: COVID-19 infection status was used to stratify patients. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were admission to the intensive care unit, unexpected intubation, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, urinary tract infection, and transfusion. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, treatment characteristics, and COVID-related symptomatology were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients (15%) tested positive for COVID-19 (COVID+) (n = 9; 7 preoperatively and 2 postoperatively) or were presumed positive (n = 1), 40 (68%) patients tested negative, and 9 (15%) patients were not tested in the primary hospitalization. American Society of Anesthesiologists' scores were higher in the COVID+ group (d = -0.83; P = 0.04); however, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was similar between the study groups (d = -0.17; P = 0.63). Inpatient mortality was significantly increased in the COVID+ cohort (56% vs. 4%; odds ratio 30.0, 95% confidence interval 4.3-207; P = 0.001). Including the one presumed positive case in the COVID+ cohort increased this difference (60% vs. 2%; odds ratio 72.0, 95% confidence interval 7.9-754; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists' scores but similar baseline comorbidities with significantly higher rates of inpatient mortality compared with those without concomitant COVID-19 infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/statistics & numerical data , Hip Fractures/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis
12.
Am J Sports Med ; 48(8): 1916-1928, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common knee injuries. Despite undergoing extensive rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), many patients have persistent quadriceps muscle weakness that limits their successful return to play and are also at an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA). Human growth hormone (HGH) has been shown to prevent muscle atrophy and weakness in various models of disuse and disease but has not been evaluated in patients undergoing ACLR. HYPOTHESIS: Compared with placebo treatment, a 6-week perioperative treatment course of HGH would protect against muscle atrophy and weakness in patients undergoing ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 19 male patients (aged 18-35 years) scheduled to undergo ACLR were randomly assigned to the placebo (n = 9) or HGH (n = 10) group. Patients began placebo or HGH treatment twice daily 1 week before surgery and continued through 5 weeks after surgery. Knee muscle strength and volume, patient-reported outcome scores, and circulating biomarkers were measured at several time points through 6 months after surgery. Mixed-effects models were used to evaluate differences between treatment groups and time points, and as this was a pilot study, significance was set at P < .10. The Cohen d was calculated to determine the effect size. RESULTS: HGH was well-tolerated, and no differences in adverse events between the groups were observed. The HGH group had a 2.1-fold increase in circulating insulin-like growth factor 1 over the course of the treatment period (P < .05; d = 2.93). The primary outcome measure was knee extension strength, and HGH treatment increased normalized peak isokinetic knee extension torque by 29% compared with the placebo group (P = .05; d = 0.80). Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3), which was used as an indirect biomarker of cartilage degradation, was 36% lower in the HGH group (P = .05; d = -1.34). HGH did not appear to be associated with changes in muscle volume or patient-reported outcome scores. CONCLUSION: HGH improved quadriceps strength and reduced MMP3 levels in patients undergoing ACLR. On the basis of this pilot study, further trials to more comprehensively evaluate the ability of HGH to improve muscle function and potentially protect against OA in patients undergoing ACLR are warranted. REGISTRATION: NCT02420353 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Human Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Muscle Weakness/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint , Male , Muscle Strength , Muscle Weakness/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...