An Anatomic Study of the Relationship Between the Iliocapsularis Muscle and Iliofemoral Ligament in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The preservation of soft tissues is an important factor for preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Anatomical studies have revealed that the inferior iliofemoral ligament (ILFL) contributes significantly to the native stability of the hip. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical structures of the iliocapsularis muscle (ICM) and ILFL from a surgical perspective. METHODS: In total, we assessed 50 hip specimens from 25 embalmed cadavers. The size and location of ICM and ILFL (at the upper, middle, and lower parts of the femoral head) were assessed in a neutral position. The ratio of ICM and ILFL widths to the femoral head was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean ICM and ILFL widths were 7.5 and 14.6, 12.0 and 14.2, and 12.8 and 15.2 mm at the upper, middle, and lower levels, respectively. The mean ICM thicknesses were 1.3, 9.0, and 9.1 mm at the upper, middle, and lower levels, respectively. The distributions of ICM and ILFL from the lateral edge of the femoral head were 21.1%-37.4% and 4.9%-36.5%, 9.5%-35.6% and 7.9%-38.7%, and 11.0%-38.7% and 9.5%-42.4% at the upper, middle, and lower levels, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICM and ILFL were located at the anterolateral side of the femoral head, and the medial edge of the ILFL corresponded to that of the ICM. ICM can serve as a landmark for preserving ILFL in total hip arthroplasty using the anterior approach.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliabilities of Three-Dimensional Postoperative Evaluation Software in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In primary and revision total hip arthroplasty, to prevent perioperative complications, the prediction of the optimal implant size is essential. Using three-dimensional computed tomography-based postoperative evaluation software, we explored the accuracy and the precision of measurement of the size, alignment, and position of the prosthetic components after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Using postoperative evaluation software, the postoperative computed tomography data from 20 hips in 20 patients were evaluated. The component size, alignment, and three-dimensional positioning of the cup and stem were assessed. The concordance rates of the component, repeatability (intraobserver reliability), and reproducibility (interobserver reliability) of postoperative evaluation were calculated. The radiographic inclination and radiographic anteversion of the cup, anteversion, varus-valgus angle, and flexion-extension angles of the stem were measured for alignment. The implant positioning was measured along three axes, namely, X-axis (transverse), Y-axis (sagittal), and Z-axis (longitudinal). RESULTS: The concordance rates of all parts are above 94%. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of alignment measurement were very good for both cup (0.879-0.964) and stem (0.973-0.996). The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of cup positioning were very good (0.961-0.987) for all axes. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of implant positioning were very good for the stem (0.879-0.995) for all axes. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-based postoperative evaluation software was able to evaluate the size and position of total hip implants with high reproducibility.

Comparison study of bone strength of the proximal femur with and without hip osteoarthritis by computed tomography-based finite element analysis.

Proximal femoral fractures are common in elderly osteoporosis patients; however, its prevalence is clinically rare in hip fracture patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to evaluate bone strength of the proximal femur with or without hip OA and proximal femoral fracture risk using computed tomography (CT)-based finite element analysis (FEA). A retrospective analysis was done on CT data of 20 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty for unilateral hip OA. Furthermore, the fracture load between OA and contralateral sides was compared and the association between fracture load and risk factor was analyzed. The fracture load was significantly higher in the OA side than that in the contralateral side (3819.5 ± 1557.8 N vs. 3224.5 ± 943.7 N, respectively; P = 0.0405). There was no significant difference in fracture load between OA and the contralateral side in Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)-3 and KL-4 grade, but the KL-4 fracture load tends to be high (P = 0.2461 and P = 0.0527, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant association between fracture load and OA severity or age. The study findings may assist in predicting bone strength and proximal femur fracture risk. The results of this FEA study indicate the bone strength of the proximal femur was affected by the severity of the osteoarthritis.

Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note.

INTRODUCTION: Failed spinal fusion surgery sometimes requires salvage surgery when symptomatic, especially with postsurgical decrease in intervertebral disc height followed by foraminal stenosis. For such cases, an anterior approach to lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) provides safe, direct access to the pathological disc space and a potential improvement in the fusion rate. One LLIF approach, oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), targets the oblique lateral window of the intervertebral discs to achieve successful lateral interbody fusion. The current technical note describes spinal revision surgery using the OLIF procedure. TECHNICAL NOTE: The subjects were patients with leg pain and/or lower back pain derived from decreased intervertebral height followed by foraminal stenosis due to failed spinal fusion surgery. These patients underwent additional OLIF surgery and posterior fusion with no additional posterior direct decompression. Their outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores at baseline and final follow-up. Bony union was also evaluated using computed tomography images at final follow-up. Six subjects were evaluated, with two representative cases described in detail. Four patients had an adjacent segment disorder, and the other two patients had pseudarthrosis due to postoperative infection. The mean JOA score improved from 5.7 ± 5.4 to 21.2 ± 2.3, with a mean recovery rate of 65.0%. All cases showed intervertebral bony union. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced a salvage strategy for failed posterior spine fusion surgery cases using the OLIF procedure. Patients effectively achieved recovered intervertebral and foraminal height with no additional posterior direct decompression.

Distribution of hip pain in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of referred hip pain in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ION). METHODS: We prospectively documented 119 hips in 90 patients with ION (mean age 51 years). Patients identified the location of pain originating in their hip on a drawing of the body. Osteoarthritis of the hip (OA) was used as a historical cohort. RESULTS: Referral of pain originating from the hip in patients with ION was 93% (111 hips) to the groin, 68% (81 hips) to the knee, 36% (43 hips) to the anterior thigh, 34% (40 hips) to the buttock, 18% (22 hips) to the lower leg, 9% (11 hips) to the greater trochanter, and 8% (9 hips) to the low back. About 97% (115 hips) of pain was located in the hip region (groin, buttock, and greater trochanter) and 77% (92 hips) showed referred pain (anterior thigh, knee, lower leg, and low back). Pain from ION was significantly more frequent in the knee and lower leg, but significantly less frequent in the lower back than pain from OA. CONCLUSION: We should be aware of ION masquerading as pain in the knee or anterior thigh.