Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol ; 23(3): 253-64, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11404804

ABSTRACT

Two studies examined developmental memory test consistency and base-rate variability on the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML) using three age cohorts from the standardization sample. Study 1 examined inter-subtest correlation coefficients across the nine subtests of the WRAML and compared across three age cohorts (5, 11, 16 to 17 year olds). An age-related increase in inter-task consistency was found (mean r = .26 and .42 for the youngest and oldest age groups, respectively). However, correlation coefficients were generally in the low to moderate range (rs = .2 to .5) for all three cohorts suggesting considerable performance variability across memory subtests. Study 2 examined base-rate variability in the WRAML standardization sample using several different methods. More specifically, base-rate information is provided for the maximum discrepancy between subtests, profile strengths and weakness (i.e., discrepancies from the mean scaled score), and the prevalence of individuals within the "deficient" performance range (i.e., < = 2 SD below normative means). In addition, performance variability across the four WRAML index scores was examined by determining the prevalence rates for the maximum discrepancy (1) between index scores, and (2) from the General Memory Index compared to the other three index scores. Performance discrepancies tended to be higher among the youngest group. Again, however, considerable performance variability was observed across all three age cohorts. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.


Subject(s)
Child Development/physiology , Learning/physiology , Memory/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Assessment ; 8(1): 47-65, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310726

ABSTRACT

The Parenting Alliance Measure (PAM) provides an operational representation of Weissman and Cohen's theory of parenting that has both clinical and research applications. The PAM is a 20-item, self-report instrument that measures the strength of the perceived alliance between parents of children ages 1 to 19 years. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine whether the PAM measures the same constructs for mothers and fathers. In addition, a formal comparison between a one- and two-factor solution was conducted, and the invariance of parameter estimates for the preferred model was tested for mothers and fathers. Results indicated that the PAM measures the same dimensions for these two groups. A formal comparison between the one- and two-factor solutions favored the less parsimonious two-factor model. At the same time, the relationship between these constructs was sufficiently high to warrant interpretation of an overall parenting alliance score. Accordingly, results from the current investigation support two levels of interpretation on the PAM. Normative raw score conversions to percentile and standardized T scores are provided.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Parent-Child Relations , Parenting , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Self-Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...