Lessons learned from inter-laboratory studies of carbon isotope analysis of honey.

Forensic application of carbon isotope ratio measurements of honey and honey protein to investigate the degree of adulteration with high fructose corn syrup or other C4 plant sugars is well established. These measurements must use methods that exhibit suitable performance criteria, particularly with regard to measurement uncertainty and traceability - low levels of adulteration can only be detected by methods that result in suitably small measurement uncertainties such that differences of 1‰ or less can be reliably detected. Inter-laboratory exercises are invaluable to assess the state-of-the art of measurement capabilities of laboratories necessary to achieve such performance criteria. National and designated metrology institutes from a number of countries recently participated in an inter-laboratory assessment (CCQM-K140) of stable carbon isotope ratio determination of bulk honey. The same sample material was distributed to a number of forensic isotope analysis laboratories that could not participate directly in the metrological comparison. The results from these studies have demonstrated that the majority of participants provided isotope delta values with acceptable performance metrics; that all participants ensured traceability of their results; and that where measurement uncertainties were reported; these were fit-for-purpose. A number of the forensic laboratories only reported precision rather than full estimates of measurement uncertainty and this was the major cause of the few instances of questionable performance metrics. Reporting of standard deviations in place of measurement uncertainties is common practice outside metrology institutes and the implications for interpretations of small differences in isotopic compositions are discussed. The results have also highlighted a number of considerations that are useful for organisers of similar inter-laboratory studies in the future.

An international comparability study to determine the sources of uncertainty associated with a non-competitive sandwich fluorescent ELISA.

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays allow the specific detection and quantitation of biological molecules in complex samples at physiologically relevant concentrations. However, there are concerns over the comparability of such techniques when the same assay is performed by different operators or laboratories. An international intercomparison study was performed to assess the uncertainty involved in the estimation of a protein cytokine concentration using a fluorescent ELISA. METHODS: The intercomparison study method was based on a non-competitive sandwich immunoassay with an enhancement step to generate a fluorescent readout. The intercomparison was performed in two phases, with the uncertainty of the instrument determined separately from that of the assay. The 11 laboratories participating in the study represented national metrology institutes or nominated expert laboratories. RESULTS: Participants were asked to determine an undisclosed concentration of interferon using a supplied standard. The mean participant estimate and experimental standard deviation of the mean was 3.54+/-0.22 mg/L, with the spread of data ranging around +/-35% of the mean. The quantitation range of the ELISA and of participants' instruments displayed large variation that contributed to the overall uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Identified sources of uncertainty within the ELISA methodology included pipetting, data fitting, model selection and instrument/plate variation.