Association of lipoprotein(a) level with short- and long-term outcomes after CABG: The role of lipoprotein apheresis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level with short- and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to assess the effect of a 12 month course of weekly lipoprotein apheresis on vein graft patency and coronary atherosclerosis course in post-CABG patients with hyperlipidemia. METHODS: This study was performed in patients after successful CABG and consisted of three parts: a) a retrospective part with computed tomography assessment of vein graft patency in patients with first-year recurrence of chest pain after CABG (n = 102); b) a prospective trial with evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes during follow up time up to 15 years in relation to baseline Lp(a) levels (n = 356); c) an 12-months interventional controlled study in 50 patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels >2.6 mmol/L prior to the operation despite statin treatment that allocated into 2 groups: active (n = 25, weekly apheresis by cascade plasma filtration (CPF) plus atorvastatin), and control (n = 25, atorvastatin alone). RESULTS: Patients subjected to computed tomography were divided in two groups: 66 (65%) with at least one vein graft occlusion and 36 (35%) without occlusions. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with occluded grafts with a median (95% confidence intervals (CI)) of 24 (17-42) mg/dL vs. 12 (6-24) mg/dL in patients with patent grafts, p < 0.01. Over a mean of 8.5 ± 3.5 years (range 0.9-15.0 years), the primary and secondary endpoints were registered in 46 (13%) and 107 (30%) patients, respectively. Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL were at significantly greater risk for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-5.03, p < 0.001) and secondary endpoint (HR 3.47, 95%CI 2.48-4.85, p < 0.001) than patients with Lp(a) values <30 mg/dL. During the CPF procedure LDL-C levels decreased by 59 ± 14%, Lp(a) levels by 49 ± 15. The frequency of vein graft occlusions at study end was 14.3% (11 of 77) in the apheresis group and 27.4% (23 of 84) in the control group, p < 0.05. Progression of atherosclerosis was obtained in 26 (14.2%) segments of native coronary arteries in the apheresis group and in 50 (25.0%) segments of the control group. Regression signs were found in 30 (16.4%) and 19 (9.5%) segments, stabilization in 127 (69.4%) and 131 (65.5%) segments, respectively (χ2 = 9.37, p < 0.01). A Lp(a) level higher than 30 mg/dL was associated with a three-fold increased risk of vein grafts occlusion during first year after CABG, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that elevated Lp(a) is associated with a significantly increasing rate of one-year vein graft occlusions and adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes whereas the use of lipoprotein apheresis improves vein graft patency during the first year after CABG.

Dramatic fate of a young coronary heart disease patient rescued with specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is acknowledged to be an independent atherothrombotic risk factor. Although genetic studies have highlighted the causal relationship between coronary disease and Lp(a), it is uncertain which strategies maximize the therapeutic benefit of patients with high Lp(a) levels. We report the challenging case of a young coronary heart disease (CHD) patient who underwent 10 percutaneous coronary interventions due to repeated acute coronary syndromes (2006-2009) despite an optimally controlled, traditional risk-factor profile. For the first time, we performed specific Lp(a) immunoadsorption in the presence of very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) while the patient was on a high-dose statin regimen. There have been no previous reports of patients with high Lp(a) levels who achieved LDL-C goals when treated with an isolated Lp(a)-lowering method. Despite the very high risk of cardiovascular death, targeting Lp(a) resulted in dramatic improvement of the patient's clinical condition. Thus, we suggest that specific Lp(a) apheresis should be considered an effective new treatment strategy for patients with progressive CHD who have reached LDL-C goals but harbor elevated Lp(a) levels.

Ig apheresis for the treatment of severe DCM patients.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies against ß1-adrenoreceptor (AR) are considered by many authors to be the most significant in autoimmune process during DCM. Immunoadsorption (IA) of immunoglobulins (Ig apheresis) is a logic approach to remove autoantibodies against ß1-AR and other antibodies. The effect of Ig apheresis and the role of anti-ß1-AR in DCM are still an issue for discussion. METHODS: We have performed a prospective case-control study in 16 patients with DCM, NYHA Class II-IV congestive heart failure, positive and negative for anti-ß1-AR. RESULTS: We observed a clinically significant mean change of exercise tolerance compared with controls (6 MWT distance increased from 420 ± 130 m to 550 ± 150 m, p < 0.05). Systolic function improved rapidly by increase in LVEF from 28.6 ± 5.2% to 33.0 ± 10.3%, LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes decreased from 166 ± 58 mL to 148 ± 50 mL and from 235 ± 73 mL to 220 ± 73 mL, respectively, whereas in the control group there was no significant change in clinical variables. The improved quality of life and cardiac function in apheresis group as well as negative changes in control group didn't correlate with the presence of anti-ß1-AR. CONCLUSIONS: Ig apheresis for the treatment of DCM patients is associated with the improvement of quality of life and cardiac function regardless of the presence of anti-ß1-AR. We suggest that IgG apheresis is a safe and effective method for DCM patients.