Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(4): 261-266, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35027287

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader used in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. The study aim was to analyse demographics and outcomes of UK patients treated with fulvestrant monotherapy at nine representative centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 459 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with fulvestrant between August 2011 and November 2018 at nine UK centres were reviewed. Data were collated on demographics, progression-free survival, overall survival and disease response at first radiological assessment following fulvestrant initiation. Patients still alive by December 2018 were censored. RESULTS: Data from 429 of the 459 patients identified were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The median age was 69 (range 21-95) and 64% (n = 275) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Bone was the most commonly involved metastatic site (72%, n = 306). However, 295 (69%) patients had visceral involvement. Patients had received a median 2 (range 0-5) prior lines of endocrine therapy and median 0 (range 0-6) prior chemotherapies. Fulvestrant was first-line therapy in 43 patients (10%). The median duration of treatment was 5 months (range 1-88). The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months. In 51% of 350 patients radiologically assessed, there was evidence of disease response to fulvestrant. Fifteen per cent of these had a complete/partial response. Fulvestrant was discontinued predominantly due to disease progression, with 3% discontinued solely due to adverse events. The median overall survival for the whole cohort was 22.5 months (range 0-88). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest studied cohorts of breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant. This heavily endocrine-pretreated population reflects real-life use in the UK. Within this context, our retrospective data show that patients can experience maintained disease response when treated with fulvestrant, supporting the importance of equitable availability for all UK patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Estradiol/therapeutic use , Female , Fulvestrant/adverse effects , Humans , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Receptors, Estrogen/therapeutic use , Receptors, Progesterone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 21(12): 1471-7, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25041285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The oxaliplatin (ΟΧΑ)-based regimens FOLFOX and XELOX can cause peripheral neuropathy. It is unknown if ΟΧΑ, alone or in combination regimens, affects the Autonomous Nervous System (ANS). Accordingly, we evaluated the impact of ΟΧΑ-based chemotherapy on the ANS. METHODS: We enrolled 36 patients with colorectal cancer, treated with adjuvant mFOLFOX6 or XELOX chemotherapy, and 22 healthy volunteers. For the assessment of ANS function, participants completed a questionnaire and underwent neurophysiological examination at three time points (baseline, 3-4 months and 6-8 months after the first chemotherapy cycle). ANS testing included assessment of the adrenergic cardiovascular function (orthostatic hypotension-OH), parasympathetic heart innervation (ratio 30/15) and Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR). RESULTS: The values of the 30/15 ratio were significantly reduced at the two time point assessments compared to baseline (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, both P < 0.001), while patients had more often diastolic OH at the 6-8 month evaluation compared to baseline (P = 0.039). In contrast, SSR was not affected. The incidence of positive responses in the questionnaire assessing the subjective impact of symptoms attributable to ANS dysfunction was higher at the two time points compared to baseline (P = 0.036 and P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with significant effects on the adrenergic cardiovascular reaction and the parasympathetic heart innervation, whereas SSR remains untouched.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Autonomic Nervous System/drug effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Capecitabine , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Oxaloacetates
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...