Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure characteristics in newly diagnosed patients with normal tension glaucoma.

PurposeTo determine the mean 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) and mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) characteristics of newly diagnosed, previously untreated, Caucasian, normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients and to identify relationships between these features and visual field (VF) loss at diagnosis.MethodsConsecutive newly diagnosed NTG patients underwent 24-h habitual IOP and blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Parameters from pooled measurements obtained in the sitting (0800-2200 hours) and supine (1200-0600 hours) positions were compared and associations were sought with VF mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).ResultsSixty-two Caucasian NTG patients (24 men and 38 women) successfully completed circadian IOP and BP monitoring. In habitual position, 8 subjects (12.9%) exhibited a diurnal acrophase, 42 subjects (67.7%) demonstrated a nocturnal acrophase, one subject (1.6%) showed a flat rhythm and 11 patients (17.7%) revealed a biphasic/polyphasic rhythm. Nighttime MOPP values (supine position) were significantly greater than diurnal values (sitting position); (P<0.001). No association could be demonstrated between glaucomatous damage, as indicated by VF parameters, and either mean habitual 24-h IOP (P=0.20 and P=0.12 for MD and PSD, respectively), or habitual 24-h MOPP (P=0.96 and 0.29, for MD and PSD, respectively).ConclusionsIn this cohort of Caucasian NTG patients, most patients exhibited a nocturnal IOP acrophase when evaluated in a habitual position. No association was found between 24-h IOP or MOPP and VF damage.

Twenty-four hour efficacy with the dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination compared with the brimonidine/timolol-fixed combination in primary open-angle glaucoma.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the 24-hour efficacy of dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination (DTFC) and brimonidine/timolol-fixed combination (BTFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: One eye each of 77 POAG patients was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover comparison. Following a 2-month timolol run-in period, patients had three intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements at 1000, 1200 and 1400 h while on timolol treatment. Patients showing at least a 20% IOP reduction on timolol were randomised to 3 months of therapy with DTFC or BTFC, and then were crossed over to the opposite therapy. RESULTS: Sixty POAG patients completed the study. The mean 24-hour IOP was significantly reduced with both the fixed combinations compared with the timolol-treated diurnal IOP (P < 0.001). When the two fixed combinations were compared directly, DTFC demonstrated a lower mean 24-hour IOP level as compared with BTFC (mean difference: -0.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-1.0, -0.3), P < 0.001). At two individual time points, DTFC significantly reduced IOP more than BTFC: at 1800 h (-1.0 mm Hg, 95% CI (-1.6,-0.5), P = 0.001) and at 0200 (-0.9 mm Hg, 95% CI: (-1.4,-0.5), P = 0.001). No significant difference existed for the other time points. CONCLUSION: Both the fixed combinations significantly reduce 24-hour IOP in POAG. DTFC provided significantly better 24-hour efficacy.

24-h Intraocular pressure control with evening-dosed travoprost/timolol, compared with latanoprost/timolol, fixed combinations in exfoliative glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 24-h efficacy of travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) vslatanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG). DESIGN: A prospective, single-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomized 24-h comparison. METHODS: After up to a 6-week medicine-free period, XFG patients were randomized to either TTFC or LTFC for 3 months, dosed each evening, and then changed to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout, and both treatment periods, a 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) curve was measured. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients completed the study. The TTFC group showed a lower mean absolute 24-h IOP (18.7±2.6 vs 19.6±2.6 mm Hg, P<0.001), maximum IOP (20.5±2.6 vs 21.5±2.6 mm Hg, P<0.001) and 24-h IOP range (3.4±1.3 vs 4.1±1.6 mm Hg, P=0.01). At individual time points, TTFC showed reduced IOPs compared with LTFC, after a Bonferroni correction, at 1000, 1800, and 2200 hours (P≤0.04). No statistical differences existed at hours: 0600, 1400, and 0200 (P≥0.05) and for the minimum IOP (P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that evening-dosed TTFC may provide greater 24-h IOP reduction, primarily at the 1800 hours time point, compared with LTFC in XFG.

Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry.

AIMS: To compare supine nighttime intraocular pressure measurements with Perkins applanation tonometry to 24-h sitting intraocular pressures with Goldmann applanation tonometry. METHODS: A prospective, untreated, uncontrolled, observational cohort of qualified consecutive ocular hypertensive or primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Patients underwent sitting intraocular pressure measurements over 24-h by Goldmann and patients had their supine nighttime intraocular pressure measurements by Perkins. RESULTS: In 100 completed patients, the mean intraocular pressure at 1000, 2200, 0200 and 0600 hours while sitting was 22.5+/-3.7 mm Hg, and in the supine position, 23.5+/-4.3 mm Hg (P<0.001). The mean sitting Goldmann intraocular pressures across the three daytime points was 23.3+/-3.4 mm Hg and across three nighttime points was 21.5+/-4.0 mm Hg (P<0.001). In contrast, the mean daytime sitting Goldmann intraocular pressure was not different than the mean nighttime supine intraocular pressure evaluated with Perkins (22.8+/-4.4 mm Hg, P=0.07). However, only 70% of patients were within 1.0 mm Hg of the highest daytime reading for all nighttime supine and sitting intraocular pressures. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that with Perkins applanation tonometry the untreated mean supine intraocular pressures are not higher at night than daytime sitting Goldmann applanation tonometry. However, the highest daytime sitting intraocular pressure measurement does not consistently predict the highest nighttime sitting or supine intraocular pressure value.

Does the use of trypan blue during phacoemulsification affect the intraocular pressure?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of trypan blue on intraocular pressure (IOP) after small-incision cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients (30 eyes) with bilateral, dense, age-related cataracts. METHODS: Patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, exfoliation, pigment dispersion syndrome, history of uveitis, recent use of topical or systemic steroids, and previous ocular surgery were excluded. The patients were randomly assigned to receive trypan blue during cataract surgery for enhancing capsulorrhexis in 1 of their eyes, while in the other eye, trypan blue was not used. Cataract surgery was performed in an identical fashion in both eyes, with a sutureless posterior limbal incision, phacoemulsification, and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. The same viscoelastic (sodium hyaluronate) was used in all cases and was thoroughly aspirated at the end of the procedure. All patients received a single dose of 250 mg acetazolamide 8 hours after surgery. No other antiglaucomatous agent was used during surgery or postoperatively. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured preoperatively and at 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: IOP values were similar in both groups at all 4 postoperative measurements. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative IOP values between the eyes in which trypan blue was used and the control eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trypan blue during small-incision cataract surgery does not have any effect on IOP during the immediate and early postoperative period.

Late postoperative opacification of hydrogel intraocular lenses: analysis of 13 explanted lenses.

PURPOSE: We report the clinical, morphological, and ultrastructural findings of 13 consecutively explanted opacified Hydroview(R) (hydrogel) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Our purpose was to provide a comprehensive account on the possible factors involved in late postoperative opacification of these IOLs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive opacified hydrogel IOLs (Hydroview H 60 M, Bausch & Lomb) were explanted due to the significant visual impairment they caused. The IOLs underwent macroscopical examination, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and electrophoresis for protein detection. Three unused control Hydroview IOLs served for comparison. RESULTS: Macroscopical examination showed a diffuse or localized grey-whitish opacification within the IOL optic. TEM confirmed the presence of lesions inside the optic in all the explanted IOLs and revealed 3 patterns of deep deposits: a) diffuse, thick, granular, electron-dense ones; b) small, thin, lattice-like ones, with prominent electron-lucent areas; and c) elongated electron-dense formations surrounded by electron-lucent halos. SEM showed surface deposits on four IOLs. EDS revealed oxygen and carbon in all IOLs and documented calcium, phosphorus, silicon and/or iron in the deposits. Two of the patients with iron in their IOLs had eye surgery prior to their phacoemulsification. Iron correlated well with the second TEM pattern of deep lesions, whereas calcium with the third TEM pattern. No protein bands were detected on electrophoresis. Control lenses did not show any ultrastructural or chemical abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the presence of chemical alterations inside the polymer of the optic in late postoperative opacification of Hydroview IOLs. This opacification does not follow a unique pathway but may present under different ultrastructular patterns depending on the responsible factors. Mechanical stress during surgery may initiate a sequence of events where ions such as calcium, phosphorus, silicon, and/or iron, participate in a biochemical cascade that leads to gradual alteration of the polymer network. Intraocular inflammation due to previous operation may be a factor inducing opacification through increase of iron-binding capacity in the aqueous humour. Calcification accounts only partially for the opacification noted in this type of IOL.

24-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus timolol.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 24-hr intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood pressure (BP) with timolol or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC). METHODS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with normal blood pressure were randomized to LTFC, dosed each evening, or timolol dosed twice daily in a cross-over design for 8 weeks and the opposite medicine for 8 weeks. IOP was measured at 02:00, 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00 hours in the sitting position with Goldmann applanation tonometry and BP monitoring every 30 min while awake and every hour while asleep at the end of each 8-week treatment period. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a 24-hr baseline IOP of 26.3 +/- 2.5 mmHg, systolic BP (SBP) of 121.4 +/- 12.4 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) 72.9 +/- 7.1 mmHg, and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) of 33.9 +/- 5.7 mmHg. No statistical differences were found between untreated and treated 24-hr SBP, DBP, mean BP (MBP), heart rate, or nocturnal BP dipping status with either medication. LTFC lowered IOP more at each timepoint compared to timolol (difference between treatments 2.7 mmHg, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Neither timolol or evening-dosed LTFC reduced SBP, DBP, MBP, OPP, or increased nocturnal dipping. LTFC was more effective than timolol in decreasing IOP.

Mean intraocular pressure and progression based on corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of glaucomatous progression at mean intraocular pressure (IOP) levels in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort analysis of 230 OHT patients with 5 years of follow-up evaluated for risk factors associated with progressive optic disc and visual field loss to determine the incidence of glaucomatous progression. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients with IOPs > or = 24 mmHg, 18% of patients with IOPs of 21-23 mmHg, 11% of patients with IOPs with 18-20 mmHg, and 3% of patients with IOPs of < or = 17 mmHg progressed to glaucoma. The mean IOP was 19.8+/-2.4 mmHg in the stable group and 21.7+/-2.6 mmHg in the progressed group (P=0.0004). The highest average peak IOP was 23.4+/-4.0 mmHg in the stable group and 25.2+/-3.1 mmHg in the progressed group (P=0.006). Based on the pachymetry values for central corneal thickness, patients with thinner corneas more often progressed to glaucoma (P<0.0001). A multivariant regression analysis to determine risk factors for progression was positive primarily for higher peak IOPs, older age, male gender, argon laser trabeculoplasty, visual acuity > or = 20/50, and no topical medical therapy or beta-blocker therapy prior to the study. CONCLUSIONS: IOP reduction within the normal range over 5 years of follow-up reduces the chance of progression to primary open-angle glaucoma in OHT patients.

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24 h efficacy and safety of the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) versus travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. METHODS: Prospective, double-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomised 24 h comparison. After a 6 week medicine-free period, patients were randomised to either TTFC or travoprost for 8 weeks and were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 8 weeks. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, a 24 h pressure curve was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the study. The TTFC group demonstrated a lower absolute intraocular pressure level (2.4 mm Hg) for the 24 h curve and at all time points, compared with travoprost (p0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that when both drugs are dosed in the evening the TTFC provides improved intraocular pressure reduction, compared with travoprost, over the 24 h curve and for each individual time point in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Long-term progression at individual mean intraocular pressure levels in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To describe progression and non-progression rates at individual mean intraocular pressure (IOP) levels for patients with primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma. METHODS: A meta-analysis of five previously published retrospective studies describing progression and non-progression rates at individual intraocular pressure levels over 5 or more years of follow-up. All patients had primary open-angle (four studies) or exfoliative glaucoma (one study). RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 822 patients of whom 655 (80%) had primary openangle glaucoma and 167 (20%) had exfoliative glaucoma. In total, 220 patients progressed (27%), while 602 (73%) remained stable over 5 years. The mean IOP was 20.0 for progressed and 17.1 mmHg for stable patients (p=0.0004). The peak IOP was 29.1 for progressed and 23.6 mmHg for stable patients (p=0.0014). At an IOP level >18 mmHg, 49% of patients remained stable; at 18 mmHg, 78%; between 13 and 17 mmHg, 82%; and <13 mmHg, 96%. Additional factors associated with progression were older age (p=0.0004) and exfoliative glaucoma (p=0.0001). However, multivariant regression analysis identified only mean IOP as a risk factor for progression (p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that maintaining an IOP well within the normal range over 5 years in patients with primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma helps to prevent glaucomatousprogression.

Second-line therapy with dorzolamide/timolol or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus adding dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination to latanoprost monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate open-angle glaucoma patients, who were insufficiently controlled on latanoprost monotherapy, to determine the 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy and safety when changing them to dorzolamide/timolol (DTFC) or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) or adding DTFC. METHODS: A prospective, observer-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, comparison. Consecutive adults with primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma who exhibit a mean baseline IOP >21 mm Hg on latanoprost monotherapy were randomised for 3 months to: DTFC, LTFC or DTFC and latanoprost. Patients were then crossed over to the next treatment for periods 2 and 3. At the end of the latanoprost run-in and after each 3-month treatment period, patients underwent 24 h IOP monitoring. RESULTS: 31 patients completed this study. All three adjunctive therapies significantly reduced the IOP at each time point and for the mean 24 h curve, except at 18:00 and 02:00 with DTFC and 02:00 with LTFC. When the three treatments were compared directly, the DTFC and latanoprost therapy demonstrated lower IOPs versus the other treatment groups, including: the mean 24 h pressure, maximum as well as minimum levels and individual time points following a modified Bonferroni correction (p<0.0032). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed DTFC, LTFC and the addition of DTFC to latanoprost significantly decrease the IOP compared with latanoprost alone, but the latter therapy regime yields the greatest IOP reduction.

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with bimatoprost versus latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.

AIM: To evaluate 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood pressure (BP) with bimatoprost or latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, crossover, active-controlled, observer-masked study. METHODS: After a 6-week medicine-free period, we randomised patients to either latanoprost or bimatoprost for 8 weeks and then to the opposite medicine for 8 weeks. At baseline, and at the end of each treatment period, we evaluated IOP and BP at 08:00 and then every 2 h over the 24 h day. Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) was calculated from the above parameters. RESULTS: Forty completed patients had a 24 h untreated baseline IOP of 15.5 (2.3) mm Hg, and a DOPP of 59.2 (6.1) mm Hg. Both treatments lowered IOP at each time point (p<0.006), and over the 24 h curve (p<0.001, both medicines 13.1 mm Hg, 16% decrease). No difference existed between treatments in absolute IOP, at each time point, and over the 24 h curve (p>or=0.26). Additionally, no differences were found between treated 24 h systolic (p>or=0.29) and diastolic BP (p>or=0.12). The mean 24 h DOPP for latanoprost was increased from baseline (3%, p = 0.031) but not for bimatoprost (2%, p = 0.21). However, no difference in DOPP existed between treatments at any time point or over the 24 h curve (p>or=0.17). No difference was observed between treatments for any adverse event (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with normal-tension glaucoma, both bimatoprost and latanoprost reduce the 24 h intraocular pressure from untreated baseline to a similar extent. Latanoprost is associated with slightly improved ocular diastolic perfusion pressure over 24 h but similar absolute perfusion levels to that of bimatoprost.

Evaluation of the acoustic function in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma: audiometric and tympanometric findings.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have reported increased audiometric thresholds in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (XFS), compared with normative data. This study examines mean audiometric thresholds and tympanometric peak values in patients with XFS and in a control group. METHODS: This is a prospective, nonrandomized control case study. Patients with XFS in one or both eyes constituted the study group (SG). Patients without XFS in either eye constituted the control group (CG). Patients with a history of conditions affecting hearing function were excluded. The SG and the CG included 54 and 48 patients, respectively. Pure tone hearing thresholds levels were measured at 0.25, 1, 2, 3, and 8 kHz. Tympanometric peak values were also recorded. Differences in audiometric mean threshold values and tympanometric peak values between SG and CG, as well as between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes, were examined. RESULTS: Bone and air audiometric thresholds were significantly increased in SG for 3 kHz and 8 kHz but not for 0.25 kHz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz. Tympanometric peak values were significantly lower in SG compared with CG. In SG, glaucomatous patients had significantly higher air-conduction thresholds for 3 kHz and 8 kHz. Differences in bone and air audiometric findings as well as tympanometric findings between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous patients were statistically not significant in CG. CONCLUSIONS: The results agree with previous reports on sensorineural hearing loss in XFS. The reduced tympanometric peak values in SG imply impairment in the elastic properties of the middle ear in XFS. The findings provide additional evidence for the systemic nature of XFS.

Twenty-four-hour efficacy of the brimonidine/timolol fixed combination versus therapy with the unfixed components.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versusthe unfixed combination of its individual components, each dosed twice daily, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: An observer-masked, randomized, crossover, active-controlled, two-centre comparison. Following a 6-week medicine-free period, patients were randomized to BTFC or to the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol for 3 months. Patients then were crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the medicine-free period, and each treatment period, patients underwent 24-h IOP measurements at 0600, 1000, 1400, 1800, 2200, and 0200 hours. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed this study. Both BTFC and the unfixed components showed a significant IOP reduction from untreated baseline (P<0.0001), and were statistically equal when compared directly, for each individual time point and for the 24-h IOP curve (P>0.05). The mean 24-h IOP was 24.6+/-1.9 for baseline, 19.2+/-1.9 for BTFC, and 19.2+/-1.6 mmHg for the unfixed components (P=1.0). Four patients were discontinued due to side effects. The most common ocular adverse event was ocular hyperaemia (n=3 with BTFC and n=5 with the unfixed components, P=0.7) and systemic adverse events were rare. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both BTFC and the unfixed components of brimonidine and timolol provide a significant 24-h IOP reduction from untreated baseline, and statistically equal control when compared directly, at each time point and for the 24-h pressure curve.

Diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma: a crossover, observer-masked, three-centre study.

AIM: To evaluate the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) control and safety of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG). METHODS: One eye of 129 consecutive patients with XFG (mean (SD) age 66.5 (8.3) years) was included in this prospective, observer-masked, three-centre, crossover comparison. After a 4-6 week medicine-free period patients were randomised to bimatoprost or latanoprost monotherapy for 3 months. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout and the treatment periods diurnal IOP was measured at 0800, 1300, and 1800. RESULTS: At baseline the IOP (mean (SD)) was 28.0 (4.0), 26.9 (3.6), and 25.9 (3.6) mm Hg, at the three time points, respectively. Both treatments significantly reduced mean diurnal IOP at month 3. Mean diurnal IOP was 26.9 (3.5) mm Hg at baseline, 17.6 (3.3) mm Hg with bimatoprost, and 18.6 (3.6) mm Hg with latanoprost (p<0.0001). Furthermore, lower IOP values were obtained with bimatoprost at all time points (17.9 (3.4), 17.3 (3.3), and 17.6 (3.5) mm Hg, respectively) compared with latanoprost (18.7 (3.6), 18.5 (3.6), and 18.6 (4.1) mm Hg, respectively). The corresponding mean differences (0.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mm Hg, respectively) were all significant (p<0.001 for each comparison). Significantly more patients with XFG obtained a target diurnal IOP <17 mm Hg with bimatoprost than with latanoprost, 55/123 (45%) v 34/123 (28%); (p = 0.001), and significantly fewer patients were non-responders with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (5 v 13, p = 0.021). More patients reported at least one adverse event with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (58 v 41 at 3 months; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: This crossover study suggests that better diurnal IOP control is obtained with bimatoprost than with latanoprost in patients with XFG.

Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome: a 2 year prospective study.

AIM: To determine the long term intraocular pressure (IOP) response to phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome (XFS). METHODS: Prospective, multicentre, cohort study with the following inclusion criteria: age over 50 years, open iridocorneal angle, and cataract. Two groups were enrolled: those with XFS and those without. The main outcome was mean IOP reduction 2 years after phacoemulsification cataract extraction (PCE). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 183 patients were enrolled, 71 with and 112 without XFS. There were 29 patients with glaucoma in both groups. Mean baseline IOP was higher in XFS compared to control eyes (17.60 (SD 3.23) mm Hg v 16.08 (3.18) mm Hg, p = 0.002). Overall IOP reduction was significantly greater in the XFS group at the 2 year time point (-1.85 mm Hg v -0.62 mm Hg in the controls (p = 0.0037)). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the IOP lowering effect in the XFS group may be related to irrigation volume at the time of surgery. In the subgroup analyses IOP lowering was significantly greater in the XFS and XFG patients than in controls without glaucoma, and POAG controls, respectively. The percentage of patients with a postoperative IOP spike was similar and relatively high in both XFS and control groups (34% v 25%; p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: IOP decreases more in patients with XFS following PCE compared to control eyes without XFS. This effect is more pronounced in glaucoma patients and persists for at least 2 years.

Viral conjunctivitis interfering with the clinical activity score and management of thyroid ophthalmopathy.

INTRODUCTION: The management of Graves' ophthalmopathy is shared between endocrinologists and ophthalmologists. Assessment and treatment of the active inflammatory stage is based on the clinical activity and disease severity scores, often without detailed eye examination by the treating endocrinologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a case of acute viral keratoconjunctivitis occurring during immunosuppressive treatment for Graves' ophthalmopathy which masked the signs, symptoms and response to treatment of the orbitopathy, posing a differential diagnostic challenge. RESULTS: The apparent worsening of the ophthalmopathy and the increased clinical activity score led the treating endocrinologist to alter the management decisions. Ophthalmic examination confirmed the diagnosis of viral keratoconjunctivitis and immunosuppressive treatment was continued with significant final improvement of Graves' ophthalmopathy. DISCUSSION: Ocular surface conditions, unrecognised by the treating physician, may complicate the assessment of thyroid ophthalmopathy when detailed eye examination is not performed. The diagnostic challenge of Graves' ophthalmopathy requires a combined approach by an endocrinologist and an ophthalmologist working as a team.

Presentation and long-term follow-up of exfoliation glaucoma in Greece, Spain, Russia, and Hungary.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical presentation and long-term follow-up of exfoliation glaucoma in separate European population groups. METHODS: A four-center, retrospective, case series analysis in which 200 charts of patients with exfoliation glaucoma or patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) associated with exfoliation syndrome in at least one eye with at least 5 years of follow-up were consecutively reviewed. RESULTS: This study found an average follow-up time of 6.0+/-2.1 years. Patients in Hungary and Spain statistically presented at an older age (79 years) than Greek patients (67 years). Patients with exfoliation glaucoma in Greece and Hungary had more glaucomatous damage, had more severe glaucoma, had a higher untreated IOP (31.8 to 32.1 mmHg), and were more difficult to control, showing a greater number of changes in medicines during the follow-up period, a greater number of medicines at the end of the follow-up period, and more progression. On long-term follow-up, Greek, Russian, and Hungarian patients also had the highest mean IOP (18.8 to 20.8 mmHg) and the greatest incidence of progression (approximately 50%). Spanish patients demonstrated the lowest mean IOP (17.6+/-3.6 mmHg) and the lowest rate of progression (28%) during the follow-up period and the fewest number of medications per patient (0.7) to control the IOP at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of exfoliation glaucoma presentation and its course may differ within distinct geographic populations in Europe.

Correlation between polarimetric retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and retinal sensitivity determined with frequency-doubling technology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Correlation between polarimetric retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with variable corneal compensation and retinal sensitivity measured with frequency-doubling technology (FDT) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma and 17 healthy control subjects (1 randomly selected eye for each subject) were evaluated. RESULTS: For all subjects, quadrant scanning laser polarimetry parameters correlated positively with both FDT and SAP mean sensitivity of the opposite hemifield (P< .001). Global scanning laser polarimetry parameters correlated positively with FDT-mean sensitivity, SAP-mean sensitivity, and FDT-mean deviation, and negatively with SAP-mean deviation (in SAP, mean deviation is positive in case of sensitivity loss) (P < or = .02). The nerve fiber indicator also correlated with FDT-pattern standard deviation and SAP-corrected loss variance (P < or = .01). Using un-logged sensitivity values, no further correlations were found. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a similar structure-function relationship exists between polarimetric retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined with variable corneal compensation and retinal sensitivity measured with SAP and FDT.

Daytime diurnal curve comparison between the fixed combinations of latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% and dorzolamide 2%/timolol maleate 0.5%.

PURPOSE: The diurnal efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations of latanoprost/timolol given once daily vs dorzolamide/timolol given twice daily in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. DESIGN: A double-masked, two-centre, crossover comparison. RESULTS: In 33 patients, the mean diurnal IOP (0800-2000, measured every 2 h) for latanoprost/timolol fixed combination was 17.3+/-2.2 mmHg and for dorzolamide/timolol, the fixed combination was 17.0+/-2.0 mmHg (P = 0.36). Additionally, there was no statistical difference for individual time points following a Bonferroni correction. A bitter taste was found more frequently with the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (n = 6) than the latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (n = 0) (P = 0.040), while the latanoprost/timolol fixed combination demonstrated more conjunctival hyperaemia (n = 9) than the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (n = 2) (P = 0.045). One patient was discontinued early from the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination due to elevated IOP. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the daytime diurnal IOP is not statistically different between the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients.