SHP-2 complex formation with the SHP-2 substrate-1 during C2C12 myogenesis.

Myogenesis is a highly ordered process that involves the expression of muscle-specific genes, cell-cell recognition and multinucleated myotube formation. Although protein tyrosine kinases have figured prominently in myogenesis, the involvement of tyrosine phosphatases in this process is unknown. SHP-2 is an SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase, which positively regulates growth and differentiation. We show that in C2C12 myoblasts, SHP-2 becomes upregulated early on during myogenesis and associates with a 120 kDa tyrosyl-phosphorylated complex. We have identified that the 120 kDa complex consists of the SHP-2 substrate-1 (SHPS-1) and the Grb2-associated binder-1 (Gab-1). SHPS-1, but not Gab-1, undergoes tyrosyl phosphorylation and association with SHP-2 during myogenesis, the kinetics of which correlate with the expression of MyoD. Either constitutive expression or inducible activation of MyoD in 10T(1/2) fibroblasts promotes SHPS-1 tyrosyl phosphorylation and its association with SHP-2. It has been shown that p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity is required for the expression/activation of MyoD and MyoD-responsive genes. Inhibition of p38 MAPK by SB203580 in differentiating C2C12 myoblasts blocks MyoD expression, SHPS-1 tyrosyl phosphorylation and the association of SHPS-1 with SHP-2. These data suggest that SHPS-1/SHP-2 complex formation is an integral signaling component of skeletal muscle differentiation.

Arginine-enhanced enteral nutrition augments the growth of a nitric oxide-producing tumor.

BACKGROUND: Arginine-enhanced diets have been shown to be beneficial in tumor-bearing hosts, but no data exist regarding their effects in hosts bearing nitric oxide (NO)-producting tumors. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of arginine supplementation on the growth of a NO-producing murine breast cancer cell line. METHODS: EMT-6 cells were grown in various concentrations of arginine in the presence or absence of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor, aminoguanidine (1 mmol/L). Forty-eight hours later, nitrite accumulation and viable cell number were assessed. BALB/c mice were then pair-fed basal purified diets (n = 10), 4% casein diets (isonitrogenous control, n = 5), or 4% arginine-enhanced diets (n = 10). One week later, 10(5) EMT-6 cells were implanted subcutaneously into the dorsal flank. After tumor implantation, five mice fed basal purified diets and five mice fed arginine-enhanced diets also received aminoguanidine (100 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily). Two weeks after tumor cell implantation, tumor size (mean diameter), animal weight, serum and tumor nitrite and nitrate levels were measured. RESULTS: There was minimal nitrite accumulation in arginine-free media, while increasing the arginine concentration increased nitrite levels. Viable cell number did not increase in arginine-free media, but increased nearly twofold in 100 and 1000 mumol/L arginine. In 5000 and 10,000 mumol/L arginine, the difference in viable cell number was not statistically different than that seen in arginine-free media, whereas the addition of aminoguanidine blocked nitrite accumulation and increased viable cell number at these arginine concentrations. Arginine-enhanced diets stimulated tumor growth in vivo more than twofold over tumor growth in mice fed isonitrogenous control or basal purified enteral diets. Mice fed arginine-enhanced diets also had increased serum nitrite and nitrate levels over mice fed basal purified enteral diets, whereas tumors from mice fed arginine-enhanced diets had nitrite and nitrate levels similar to mice fed basal purified enteral diets. Aminoguanidine blocked the increase in serum nitrite and nitrate, but failed to block the increased tumor growth in mice receiving the arginine-supplemented diets. CONCLUSIONS: Arginine concentration influences the growth of EMT-6 tumor cells in vitro and dietary arginine supplementation augments tumor growth in vivo. The mechanism of the growth modulation in vitro is NO-dependent whereas the enhanced tumor growth in vivo is NO-independent.

Nitric oxide contributes to adriamycin's antitumor effect.

UNLABELLED: Recently, several antitumor drugs have been shown to stimulate nitric oxide (NO) production. PURPOSE: To determine if adriamycin induces NO production in breast cancer cells in vitro and whether NO contributes to adriamycin's antitumor effect in vivo. METHODS: Murine breast cancer cells (EMT-6) were incubated with adriamycin (ADRIA, 0, 10, 100, 1000 microM) in the presence or absence of the NO synthase inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG, 1 mM). Twenty-four hours later nitrite accumulation (Greiss reagent) and cell viability (MTT assay) were assessed. Supernatants from adriamycin-stimulated cells were also analyzed at 6, 8, and 24 hr for TNF, IL-1, and IFN gamma (ELISA). For in vivo experiments, 10(5) EMT-6 cells were injected into the flank of BALB/c mice (n = 20) and 1 hr later mice received one of four treatments: (1) saline, (2) ADRIA (10 mg/kg ip), (3) AG (100 mg/kg sc BID), or (4) ADRIA (10 mg/kg ip) and AG (100 mg/kg sc BID). Two weeks later tumor size was measured and in situ tumor cell apoptosis was determined by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Adriamycin was cytotoxic to EMT-6 cells with 100 microM resulting in nearly 100% killing (P < 0.01). Adriamycin also stimulated nitrite accumulation with 100 microM producing 6.5 +/- 0.26 microM nitrite (P < 0.001). AG blocked adriamycin-stimulated nitrite accumulation (P < 0.05), but did not inhibit cytotoxicity in vitro. In vivo, adriamycin inhibited tumor size by nearly 400% (P < 0.001), while AG attenuated adriamycin's effect on tumor growth (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the detection of apoptotic tumor cells between the adriamycin and adriamycin and AG groups as determined by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that adriamycin stimulated NO production in EMT-6 cells, but adriamycin's cytotoxicity in vitro was NO-independent. In vivo, adriamycin inhibited tumorigenesis partially via an NO-dependent, nonapoptotic mechanism.