Systematic review of analgesics and dexamethasone for post-tonsillectomy pain in adults.

BACKGROUND: Intense pain can last several days after tonsillectomy. It is often undertreated and improved analgesic strategies that can be safely used at home are needed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of systemic medications used for post-tonsillectomy pain in adult and adolescent (13 yr old) patients. Studies were identified from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and by hand searching reference lists from studies and review articles. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies reporting on pain intensity or use of rescue analgesia were included. RESULTS: Twenty-nine randomised controlled trials representing 1816 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up time was ≤24 h in 15 studies, in which the majority were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Thirteen studies were suitable for meta-analysis. In pooled analysis, paracetamol, dexamethasone, and gabapentinoids reduced pain intensity on the day of operation. In individual studies, ketoprofen, ibuprofen, lornoxicam, parecoxib, rofecoxib, indomethacin and dextromethorphan reduced pain intensity, need for rescue analgesics, or both on the day of operation. Oral celecoxib for 2 postoperative weeks or i.v. ketamine on the day of operation were not effective at the studied doses. Dexamethasone in multiple doses provided analgesia beyond 1 postoperative day. Pain was moderate to strong in both study and control groups during the first postoperative week. CONCLUSIONS: Single analgesics and dexamethasone provide only a weak to moderate effect for post-tonsillectomy pain on the day of operation and thus a multimodal analgesic strategy is recommended. Short follow-up times and clinical heterogeneity of studies limit the usefulness of results.

Operating unit time use is associated with anaesthesia type in below-knee surgery in adults.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve blocks could reduce the operating unit and theatre time spent on high-risk patients who are particularly vulnerable to complications of general anaesthesia or have medications that prevent application of central neuraxial blocks. METHODS: Medical record data of 617 and 254 elderly adults undergoing below-knee surgery in Jorvi and Meilahti hospitals (Helsinki University Hospital) between January 2010 and December 2012 were used to investigate the influence of anaesthetic technique on operating theatre times and on operating unit times using flexible parametric survival models. We report operating theatre and unit exit ratios (i.e. hazard ratios but using ratios of exit rates) for different types of anaesthesia. RESULTS: Adjusted analyses: In Jorvi Hospital, anaesthesia type was associated with large initial differentials in operating theatre times. The theatre exit ratios remained lower for general anaesthesia and central neuraxial blocks compared to peripheral nerve blocks until 30 min. In Meilahti Hospital, anaesthesia type did not influence theatre time, but was the best predictor of operating unit times. Compared to peripheral nerve blocks, the exit ratio remained lower for general anaesthesia until five operating unit hours in both hospitals and for central neuraxial blocks until 1 h in Meilahti Hospital and until 3 h in Jorvi Hospital. Holding area was used more in Jorvi Hospital compared to Meilahti Hospital. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve block anaesthesia reduces time spent in the operating unit and can reduce time spent in the operating theatre if induced in holding area outside of theatre.

Intravenous ketamine during spinal and general anaesthesia for caesarean section: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous ketamine has been used during general and regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. No systematic review and meta-analysis on the desired effects and adverse effects of ketamine administration during caesarean section have yet been performed. METHODS: After a systematic literature search a meta-analysis was conducted with the random effects model. Weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. RESULTS: Twelve randomised controlled double-blind trials comprising 953 patients were included: seven studies reported on spinal anaesthesia and five on general anaesthesia. Significant differences in the aforementioned outcome variables were found only in the spinal anaesthesia studies. In the spinal anaesthesia studies the time to the first analgesic request was significantly longer in ketamine-treated women, the WMD was 49.36 min (95% CI 43.31-55.41); visual analogue scale pain scores at rest 2 h after surgery were significantly lower. No differences were observed for maternal nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and psychomimetic effects. Only few data were found for neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ketamine enhances post-operative analgesia after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. There is a paucity of data for several maternal adverse effects as well as for neonatal well-being. Further studies are needed for general anaesthesia.

Adverse effects of perioperative paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: a topical review.

Post-operative pain affects millions of patients worldwide and the post-operative period has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Some of this morbidity may be related to analgesics. The aim of this review was to provide an update of current knowledge of adverse events (AE) associated with the most common perioperative non-opioid analgesics: paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids (GCCs), gabapentinoids and their combinations. The review is based on data from systematic reviews with meta-analyses of analgesic efficacy and/or adverse effects of perioperative non-opioid analgesics, and randomised trials and cohort/retrospective studies. Generally, data on AE are sparse and related to the immediate post-operative period. For paracetamol, the incidence of AEs appears trivial. Data are inconclusive regarding an association of NSAIDs with mortality, cardiovascular events, surgical bleeding and renal impairment. Anastomotic leakage may be associated with NSAID usage. No firm evidence exists for an association of NSAIDs with impaired bone healing. Single-dose GCCs were not significantly related to increased infection rates or delayed wound healing. Gabapentinoid treatment was associated with increased sedation, dizziness and visual disturbances, but the clinical relevance needs clarification. Importantly, data on AEs of combinations of the above analgesics are sparse and inconclusive. Despite the potential adverse events associated with the most commonly applied non-opioid analgesics, including their combinations, reporting of such events is sparse and confined to the immediate perioperative period. Knowledge of benefit and harm related to multimodal pain treatment is deficient and needs clarification in large trials with prolonged observation.

Post-operative analgesic effects of paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: a topical review.

In contemporary post-operative pain management, patients are most often treated with combinations of non-opioid analgesics, to enhance pain relief and to reduce opioid requirements and opioid-related adverse effects. A diversity of combinations is currently employed in clinical practice, and no well-documented 'gold standards' exist. The aim of the present topical, narrative review is to provide an update of the evidence for post-operative analgesic efficacy with the most commonly used, systemic non-opioid drugs, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/COX-2 antagonists, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids, and combinations of these. The review is based on data from previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses, investigating effects of non-opioid analgesics on pain, opioid-requirements, and opioid-related adverse effects. Paracetamol, NSAIDs, COX-2 antagonists, and gabapentin reduced 24 h post-operative morphine requirements with 6.3 (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 9.0) mg, 10.2 (8.7, 11.7) mg, 10.9 (9.1, 12.8) mg, and ≥ 13 mg, respectively, when administered as monotherapy. The opioid-sparing effect of glucocorticoids was less convincing, 2.33 (0.26, 4.39) mg morphine/24 h. Trials of pregabalin > 300 mg/day indicated a morphine-sparing effect of 13.4 (4, 22.8) mg morphine/24 h. Notably, though, the available evidence for additive or synergistic effects of most combination regimens was sparse or lacking. Paracetamol, NSAIDs, selective COX-2 antagonists, and gabapentin all seem to have well-documented, clinically relevant analgesic properties. The analgesic effects of glucocorticoids and pregabalin await further clarification. Combination regimens are sparsely documented and should be further investigated in future studies.

Pregabalin has an opioid-sparing effect in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effect of pregabalin on oxycodone consumption, postoperative confusion, and pain in elderly cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: Seventy patients, aged ≥75 yr, were randomized to receive either 150 mg of pregabalin before operation and 75 mg of pregabalin twice daily for 5 postoperative days or placebo. Pain intensity was measured with the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). When pain intensity was ≥2 on the VRS, patients received oxycodone either i.v. (0.05 mg kg(-1)) or orally (0.10-0.15 mg kg(-1)). Postoperative confusion was measured with the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Postoperative pain was assessed by a telephone interview 1 and 3 months after operation. RESULTS: Cumulative consumption of parenteral oxycodone during 16 h after extubation was reduced by 44% and total oxycodone consumption from extubation to the end of the fifth postoperative day was reduced by 48% in the pregabalin group. Time to extubation was 138 min shorter and CAM-ICU scores were significantly lower on the first postoperative day in the placebo group, although there was no significant difference with respect to the Mini-Mental State Examination or the Richmond Agitation Sedation Score. The incidence of pain during movement was significantly lower in the pregabalin group at 3 months postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of pregabalin reduced postoperative opioid consumption after cardiac surgery reduced the incidence of confusion on the first postoperative day and increased time to extubation when compared with placebo. Three months after operation, patients in the pregabalin group experienced less pain during movement.

Inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase sensitize mice to pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors are used in Parkinson's disease in which pain is an important symptom. COMT polymorphisms modulate pain and opioid analgesia in humans. In rats, COMT inhibitors have been shown to be pro-nociceptive in acute pain models, but also to attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia in a model of diabetic neuropathy. Here, we have assessed the effects of acute and repeated administrations of COMT inhibitors on mechanical, thermal and carrageenan-induced nociception in male mice. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used single and repeated administration of a peripherally restricted, short-acting (nitecapone) and also a centrally acting (3,5-dinitrocatechol, OR-486) COMT inhibitor. We also tested CGP 28014, an indirect inhibitor of COMT enzyme. Effects of OR-486 on thermal nociception were also studied in COMT deficient mice. Effects on spinal pathways were assessed in rats given intrathecal nitecapone. KEY RESULTS: After single administration, both nitecapone and OR-486 reduced mechanical nociceptive thresholds and thermal nociceptive latencies (hot plate test) at 2 and 3 h, regardless of their brain penetration. These effects were still present after chronic treatment with COMT inhibitors for 5 days. Intraplantar injection of carrageenan reduced nociceptive latencies and both COMT inhibitors potentiated this reduction without modifying inflammation. CGP 28014 shortened paw flick latencies. OR-486 did not modify hot plate times in Comt gene deficient mice. Intrathecal nitecapone modified neither thermal nor mechanical nociception. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Pro-nociceptive effects of COMT inhibitors were confirmed. The pro-nociceptive effects were primarily mediated via mechanisms acting outside the brain and spinal cord. COMT protein was required for these actions.

Dexamethasone decreases oxycodone consumption following osteotomy of the first metatarsal bone: a randomized controlled trial in day surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone may improve multimodal pain management following painful orthopedic day surgery procedures, and decrease the need for post-operative opioids. We hypothesized that dexamethasone would reduce the need for oxycodone after surgical correction of hallux valgus. METHODS: Sixty patients planned to undergo unilateral osteotomy of the first metatarsal as a day surgery procedure were randomized to receive pre-operatively and 24 h afterwards, orally either dexamethasone 9 mg or placebo. For pain medication, paracetamol and oxycodone capsules for rescue medication were given. The study ended on the evening of the third post-operative day (POD). The primary endpoint was the cumulative oxycodone consumption. Secondary endpoints were maximal pain scores before oxycodone intake and daily oxycodone doses. In addition, adverse effects were documented. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients in both groups completed the study. The total median (range) oxycodone consumption during the study period was 45 (0-165) mg in the dexamethasone group and 78 (15-175) mg in the placebo group (P=0.049). The major differences in oxycodone consumption were seen on PODs 0-1. In the dexamethasone group, patients reported significantly lower pain scores on PODs 0-1, and significantly less nausea on POD 1. On PODs 2-3 no differences were seen. However, at 2 weeks post-operatively, patient satisfaction to drug therapy did not differ - in both groups 81% would have chosen the same medication again. CONCLUSION: Oral dexamethasone combined with paracetamol significantly reduced total oxycodone consumption following surgical correction of hallux valgus.

Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients.

Oxycodone is a strong opioid and it is increasingly used in the management of acute and chronic pain. The pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone are mainly mediated by the µ-opioid receptor. However, its affinity for the µ-opioid receptor is significantly lower compared with that of morphine and it has been suggested that active metabolites may play a role in oxycodone analgesia. Oxycodone is mainly metabolized by hepatic cytochrome (CYP) enzymes 2D6 and 3A4. Oxycodone is metabolized to oxymorphone, a potent µ-opioid receptor agonist by CYP2D6. However, CYP3A4 is quantitatively a more important metabolic pathway. Chronic pain patients often use multiple medications. Therefore it is important to understand how blocking or inducing these metabolic pathways may affect oxycodone induced analgesia. The aim of this study was to find out whether blocking CYP2D6 would decrease oxycodone induced analgesia in chronic pain patients. The effects of the antidepressant paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, on the analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of oral oxycodone were studied in 20 chronic pain patients using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study design. Pain intensity and rescue analgesics were recorded daily, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone were studied on the 7th day of concomitant paroxetine (20 mg/day) or placebo administration. The patients were genotyped for CYP2D6, 3A4, 3A5 and ABCB1. Paroxetine had significant effects on the metabolism of oxycodone but it had no statistically significant effect on oxycodone analgesia or use of morphine for rescue analgesia. Paroxetine increased the dose-adjusted mean AUC0-12h of oxycodone by 19% (-23 to 113%; P = 0.003), and that of noroxycodone by 100% (5-280%; P < 0.0001) but decreased the AUC0-12 h of oxymorphone by 67% (-100 to -22%; P < 0.0001) and that of noroxymorphone by 68% (-100 to -16%; P < 0.0001). Adverse effects were also recorded in a pain diary for both 7-day periods (placebo/paroxetine). The most common adverse effects were drowsiness and nausea/vomiting. One patient out of four reported dizziness and headache during paroxetine co-administration, whereas no patient reported these during placebo administration (P = 0.0471) indicating that these adverse effects were due to paroxetine. No statistically significant associations of the CYP2D6 or CYP3A4/5 genotype of the patients and the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone or its metabolites, extent of paroxetine-oxycodone interaction, or analgesic effects were observed probably due to the limited number of patients studied. The results of this study strongly suggest that CYP2D6 inhibition does not significantly change oxycodone analgesia in chronic pain patients and that the analgesic activity of oxycodone is mainly due to the parent compound and that metabolites, e.g. oxymorphone, play an insignificant role. The clinical implication of these results is that induction of the metabolism of oxycodone may lead to inadequate analgesia while increased drug effects can be expected after addition of potent CYP3A4/5 inhibitors particularly if combined with CYP2D6 inhibitors or when administered to poor metabolizers of CYP2D6.

Itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, moderately increases plasma concentrations of oral morphine.

BACKGROUND: Individual variation in opioid response is considerable, partly due to pharmacokinetic factors. Transporter proteins are becoming increasingly interesting also in the pharmacokinetics of opioids. The efflux transporter P-glycoprotein can affect gastrointestinal absorption and tissue distribution, particularly brain access of many opioids. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether itraconazole, which is a potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4, would change the pharmacokinetics or the pharmacodynamics of oral morphine. METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers ingested, in a randomized crossover study, once daily 200 mg itraconazole or placebo for 4 days. On day 4, 1 h after the last pre-treatment dose, the subjects ingested 0.3 mg/kg morphine. Blood samples for the determination of plasma morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and itraconazole concentrations were drawn up to 48 h after morphine ingestion. Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated using a questionnaire, visual analogue scales, a reaction time test, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Critical Flicker Fusion Test. RESULTS: Itraconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC (0-9)] of morphine by 29% (P=0.002), its AUC (0-48) by 22% (P=0.013) and its peak plasma concentration by 28% (P=0.035). Itraconazole did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetic variables of M3G or M6G or the pharmacodynamic effects of morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole moderately increases plasma concentrations of oral morphine, probably by enhancing its absorption by inhibiting intestinal wall P-glycoprotein. A possible improvement of morphine penetration to the brain could not be observed.

Electrophysiologic evidence for increased endogenous gabaergic but not glycinergic inhibitory tone in the rat spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the inhibitory activity mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine, acting at spinal GABAA receptors and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors, are of interest in the development of neuropathic pain. There is anatomic evidence for changes in these transmitter systems after nerve injuries, and blocking either GABAA or glycine receptors has been shown to produce allodynia-like behavior in awake normal animals. METHODS: In this study, the possible changes in GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory activity in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain were studied by comparing the effects of the GABAA-receptor antagonist bicuculline and the glycine-receptor antagonist strychnine in neuropathic rats to their effects in sham-operated and nonoperated control rats. RESULTS: Bicuculline produced a dose-related facilitation of the Adelta-fiber-evoked activity in all study groups and increased C-fiber-mediated activity in the spinal nerve ligation group but not in either of the control groups. There were no differences in the effect of bicuculline on low threshold responses between the study groups. The glycine receptor antagonist strychnine did not have a statistically significant effect on any of the parameters studied in any of the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the idea of an increased GABAergic inhibitory tone in the spinal cord of neuropathic rats, possibly as compensation for increased excitability after nerve injury.

Role of the delta-opioid receptor in (1DMe)NPYF mediated antinociception.

A selective delta-opioid antagonist, naltrindole, was used to study the role of the delta-opioid receptor in the antinociceptive actions of a synthetic NPFF analog, (1DMe)NPYF. I.t. (1DMe)NPYF (5 nmol) produced antinociception in the tail flick test and (1DMe)NPYF (0.5 nmol) potentiated the antinociceptive effect of i.t. morphine 7.8 nmol. (1DMe)NPYF (5 nmol) had an antihyperalgesic effect in carrageenan inflammation and it significantly reduced mechanical allodynia in the spinal nerve ligation model. All these effects were prevented or significantly reduced by pretreatment with naltrindole (28 nmol) (P < 0.01-0.001). These data suggest that activation of spinal delta-opioid receptors plays an important role in mediating the spinal antinociceptive effects of (1DMe)NPYF.

The dissociation of sedative from spinal antinociceptive effects following administration of a novel alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist, MPV-2426, in the locus coeruleus in the rat.

BACKGROUND: MPV-2426 is a novel alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist developed for spinal pain therapy. In the present study we characterized its sedative and antinociceptive properties following microinjections into the brainstem and intrathecally at the lumbar spinal cord level. METHODS: Sedative effects of MPV-2426 were assessed in a locomotion measuring device following unilateral microinjection into the locus coeruleus (LC) of the brainstem or 1-2 mm rostral to the LC in rats. Antinociceptive effects induced by MPV-2426 in the brainstem, and for comparison intrathecally at the lumbar spinal cord level, were determined with a tail-flick test. Dexmedetomidine was used as the reference alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist. RESULTS: MPV-2426 produced a dose-related hypolocomotive/sedative effect, which was significantly stronger following microinjection into the LC than 1-2 mm rostral to the LC. The sedation induced by MPV-2426 was reversed by atipamezole (1 mg/kg s.c.), an alpha-2-adrenoceptor antagonist. The sedative potency of dexmedetomidine, the reference alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonist, was stronger and less dependent on the exact injection site in the brainstem. Following microinjections at sedative doses in the brainstem, only dexmedetomidine produced a significant antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test. When microinjected into the lumbar spinal cord, MPV-2426 and dexmedetomidine had an equally strong antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the sedative potency of MPV-2426 is considerably weaker than that of dexmedetomidine. Additionally, the spread of MPV-2426 within the central nervous system is more limited than that of dexmedetomidine. This could explain why MPV-2426 is sedative only when injected into the LC while antinociceptive effect is obtained when it is injected intrathecally at the lumbar spinal cord level.

Effects of radolmidine, a novel alpha2 -adrenergic agonist compared with dexmedetomidine in different pain models in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecally administered alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists produce effective antinociception, but sedation is an important adverse effect. Radolmidine is a novel alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist with a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with the well-researched dexmedetomidine. This study determined the antinociceptive and sedative effects of radolmidine in different models of acute and chronic pain. Dexmedetomidine and saline served as controls. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were studied in acute pain (tail flick), carrageenan inflammation, and the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia was assessed with von Frey filaments, cold allodynia with the acetone test, and thermal hyperalgesia with the paw flick test. Locomotor activity-vigilance was assessed in a dark field. Dexmedetomidine and radolmidine were administered intrathecally in doses of 0.25 microg, 2.5 microg, 5 microg, and 10 microg. RESULTS: In the tail flick test, radolmidine showed a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, being equipotent compared with dexmedetomidine. In carrageenan inflammation, intrathecal doses of 2.5 microg or 5 microg of dexmedetomidine/radolmidine produced significant antinociception compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equianalgesic. In the neuropathic pain model, an intrathecal dose of 5 microg dexmedetomidine-radolmidine had a significant antiallodynic effect compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equipotent. Intrathecal administration of both dexmedetomidine and radolmidine dose dependently decreased spontaneous locomotor acitivity-vigilance, but this effect was significantly smaller after intrathecal administration of radolmidine than after intrathecal dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Radolmidine and dexmedetomidine had equipotent antinociceptive effects in all tests studied. However, radolmidine caused significantly less sedation than dexmedetomidine, probably because of a different pharmacokinetic profile.

Different increase in C-fibre evoked responses after nociceptive conditioning stimulation in sham-operated and neuropathic rats.

Mechanisms of neuropathic pain are not clear. Recently we showed long-term potentiation (LTP) of wide dynamic range (WDR) neurones after electrical conditioning stimulation of the sciatic nerve in normal rats. In this study we investigated the effects of the same conditioning on both the evoked responses of WDR cells and on vital signs in neuropathic rats. Nerve injury was produced by tight ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves and a control group received sham surgery. The electrical conditioning gave a significantly smaller LTP in neuropathic rats as compared to controls. Despite giving a smaller LTP in neuropathic rats, the rise in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate induced by the conditioning was exactly the same as in the control group. The threshold for activating C-fibres was significantly lower and the baseline tended to be higher in neuropathic rats. Thus, it is suggested that the nerve injury itself is likely to induce an LTP-like state in the neurones studied. Further studies using the LTP-inducing model can provide new information on the mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

Enlargement of the receptive field size to low intensity mechanical stimulation in the rat spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathy.

One characteristic of plasticity after peripheral tissue or nerve damage is receptive field reorganization, and enlargement of receptive field size has been suggested to occur in certain models of neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study was to explore whether enlargement of neuronal receptive fields could contribute to the mechanical allodynia found on the ipsilateral paw in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathy. After ligation of L(5)-L(6) spinal nerves, all rats developed behavioral signs of mechanical allodynia, while the sham-operated control group displayed no such changes. The characteristics of the evoked responses of the neurones recorded in the dorsal horn of the rats were similar between the spinal nerve ligation, the sham operated control group, and the nonoperated control group, except for spontaneous activity, which was significantly increased in the spinal nerve ligation group. The mean size of the receptive field on the ipsilateral hindpaw, mapped using low-intensity stimulation with 9-g von Frey hair, was significantly increased in the spinal nerve ligation group, as compared to the sham-operated group. No significant difference was seen with 15- or 75-g von Frey hairs. The distribution of the receptive fields over the plantar surface of the paw was similar between the study groups. The enlargement of receptive field for non-noxious touch could be an indication of central sensitization in this model.

Effects of spinally administered P2X receptor agonists and antagonists on the responses of dorsal horn neurones recorded in normal, carrageenan-inflamed and neuropathic rats.

1. The function and role of P2X receptors in the spinal transmission of nociception was investigated using the selective P2X receptor agonists, alpha,beta-methylene ATP (alpha,beta-me ATP) and beta, gamma-methylene-L-ATP (beta,gamma-me-L-ATP) and the P2X receptor antagonists pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonate (PPADS) and suramin. 2. Intrathecal administration of 5 and 50 microg of beta,gamma-me-L-ATP produced a significant facilitation of the C-fibre evoked response and a tendency towards increased excitability of the post-discharge, but not Abeta-fibre evoked response of dorsal horn neurones recorded in normal animals. Administration of similar doses of alpha,beta-me ATP did not produce an overall change in the response of the neuronal population. 3. Peripheral administration of 20 microg of these agonists into the paw of the rat evoked firing in the dorsal horn neurones. 4. Intrathecal administration of the antagonists, suramin (50 and 500 microg) and PPADS (5, 50 and 500 microg), to normal animals and to animals with a model of neuropathy induced by spinal nerve ligation did not alter the evoked neuronal responses. In contrast, intrathecal administration of 500 microg of suramin to animals 3 h after the induction of carrageenan inflammation produced a significant inhibition of the C-fibre evoked response of the neurones. Similar inhibitions were also seen following high doses of intrathecal PPADS, although this did not reach significance. 5. These results suggest that spinal P2X receptors may play a role in the modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission following the development of inflammation, but that these receptors play at most a minor role in spinal nociceptive processing in normal and neuropathic animals.

Neuropeptide FF and modulation of pain.

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and the related longer peptide neuropeptide AF (NPAF) derive from a single gene in several mammalian species. The gene product is expressed mainly in the CNS, where the posterior pituitary and dorsal spinal cord contain the highest concentrations. Evidence from biochemical and immunohistochemical studies combined with in situ hybridization using NPFF gene-specific probes suggest that all NPFF-like peptides may not derive from the characterized NPFF gene, but that other genes can exist which give rise to related peptides. Intraventricular NPFF exerts antiopioid effects, but intrathecal NPFF potentiates the analgesic effects of morphine. NPFF mRNA expression is upregulated in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord after carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind paw of the rat, but not in the neuropathic pain model induced by ligation of the spinal roots. NPFF produces a submodality-selective potentiation of the antinociceptive effect induced by brain stem stimulation in the spinal cord during inflammation, and this effect is independent of naloxone-sensitive opioid receptors. In neuropathic animals, NPFF injected into the periaqueductal grey produces a significant attenuation of tactile allodynia, which is not modulated by naloxone. NPFF thus modulates pain sensation and morphine analgesia under normal and pathological conditions through both spinal and brain mechanisms.

Effects of (1DMe)NPYF, a synthetic neuropeptide FF analogue, in different pain models.

The antinociceptive effects of intrathecal (IT) (1DMe)NPYF were studied in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. (1DMe)NPYF produced dose-dependent antinociception that was reduced by subcutaneous injection of naloxone. (1DMe)NPYF (0.5 nmol) also potentiated the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal morphine 7.8 nmol. This suggests that the antinociceptive effects of (1DMe)NPYF are partially mediated by opioid receptor activation. In carrageenan inflammation, 5-10 nmol of (1DMe)NPYF was effective against both thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia. In the neuropathic pain model, the lowest dose tested (0.5 nmol) showed antiallodynic effects against cold allodynia. The results suggest a potential role for (1DMe)NPYF in the treatment of pain including neuropathic pain.

Systemic physostigmine shows antiallodynic effects in neuropathic rats.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to examine the antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects of subcutaneously administered physostigmine (50, 100, 200 micrograms/kg), compared with morphine (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) and NaCl after spinal nerve ligation in rats. The following stimuli were used: acetone (cold allodynia), von Frey hairs (mechanical allodynia), and paw flick test (thermal nociception). Motility boxes were used to investigate the effects of the drugs on motor performance. Physostigmine attenuated both mechanical and cold allodynia dose-dependently but had no effect on the paw flick test. The effect was antagonized by atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist) but not by mecamylamine (nicotinic receptor antagonist) or naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist). Morphine produced dose-dependent antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects. In the antiallodynic doses, morphine caused severe rigidity. Physostigmine 200 micrograms/kg impaired locomotor activity, but no rigidity was observed. IMPLICATIONS: Physostigmine has different effects on allodynia and nociception, which suggests that different cholinergic (muscarinic) mechanisms may be involved in neuropathic and nociceptive pain.