ABSTRACT
Residence at a long-term care facility (LTCF) and older age are both recognized as significant risk factors for harboring MDRGNB. However, well designed prospective observational studies are few on the prevalence and risk factors of MDRGNB influx to hospital due to elderly patients arriving from LTCFs. Between November 1 and December 31, 2009, at a 500-bed, public teaching hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea, all clinical cultures within 48 h of hospitalization from elderly patients at least 50 years of age arriving from LTCFs were collected prospectively. During these periods, the prevalence of MDRGNB influx among elderly patients from LTCFs was higher than that among other hospitalized patients (14.5% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [OR] 8.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-18.8, P<0.001). Of a total of 55 elderly hospitalized subjects from 6 LTCFs, clinical cultures were performed in 37. MDRGNB were found in 8 patients (6 of whom were infected). There was no difference between patients with and without MDRGNB regarding previously reported clinical characteristics associated with harboring MDRGNB. However, the mortality within one month of hospitalization was higher in patients with MDRGNB than without MDRGNB, regardless of the appropriateness of the antibiotics they received (OR, 15.91; 95% CI, 1.01-251.36; P=0.049). In conclusion, the prevalence of MDRGNB influx among elderly patients from LTCFs is significant in Korean public hospital. They require specific remedies in order to reduce the risk of early mortality.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/transmission , Hospitals, Public , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Republic of Korea/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatments fail at least in 10-20% of patients. However, retreatment strategies after failure of initial treatment have not been established. This study was conducted to evaluate the eradication rate of retreatment choices. METHODS: Twenty-seven peptic ulcer patients who were retreated with OAC (omeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin) or BMT (bismuth + metronidazole + tetracycline) after failure of BMT or OAC were included. Quadruple therapy (omeprazole + BMT) was also tried after failure of two successive triple therapies. Furthermore, the effect of resistance of metronidazole or clarithromycin on the eradication of H. pylori was evaluated. RESULTS: Among 13 patients who were retreated with OAC after failure of BMT regimen, H. pylori was eradicated in 10 patients (76.9%). Among 14 patients retreated with BMT after failure of OAC regimen, H. pylori was eradicated in 11 patients (78.6%). Resistance of H. pylori to metronidazole or clarithromycin decreased the efficacy of BMT or OAC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication regimen should be decided considering the resistance to H. pylori. However, in case of unknown state of resistance, OAC can be chosen if BMT fails. Similarly, BMT can be tried in cases that OAC therapy failed. After failures of both triple therapies, quadruple therapy can be tried as the next step.
