Rational combination of SHP2 and mTOR inhibition for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the main primary malignancy affecting the liver. Unfortunately, there are still limited therapeutic options for HCC, and even the latest advances have only increased the overall survival modestly. Thus, new treatment strategies and rational drug combinations are urgently needed. Reactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) has been described as a mechanism of intrinsic resistance to targeted therapies in a variety of cancers, including inhibitors of mTOR. The design of rational combination therapies to overcome this type of resistance is complicated by the notion that multiple RTK can be upregulated during the acquisition of resistance. SHP2, encoded by the gene PTPN11, acts downstream of virtually all RTK, and has proven to be a good target for small molecule inhibitors. Here, we report activation of multiple RTK upon mTOR inhibition in HCC which, through SHP2, leads to reactivation of the mTOR pathway. We show that co-inhibition of both mTOR and SHP2 is highly synergistic in vitro by triggering apoptosis. More importantly, the combination is well-tolerated and outperforms the monotherapies in impairing tumor growth in multiple HCC mouse models. Our findings suggest a novel rational combination therapy for the treatment of HCC.

An unexplored angle: T cell antigen discoveries reveal a marginal contribution of proteasome splicing to the immunogenic MHC class I antigen pool.

In the current era of T cell-based immunotherapies, it is crucial to understand which types of MHC-presented T cell antigens are produced by tumor cells. In addition to linear peptide antigens, chimeric peptides are generated through proteasome-catalyzed peptide splicing (PCPS). Whether such spliced peptides are abundantly presented by MHC is highly disputed because of disagreement in computational analyses of mass spectrometry data of MHC-eluted peptides. Moreover, such mass spectrometric analyses cannot elucidate how much spliced peptides contribute to the pool of immunogenic antigens. In this Perspective, we explain the significance of knowing the contribution of spliced peptides for accurate analyses of peptidomes on one hand, and to serve as a potential source of targetable tumor antigens on the other hand. Toward a strategy for mass spectrometry independent estimation of the contribution of PCPS to the immunopeptidome, we first reviewed methodologies to identify MHC-presented spliced peptide antigens expressed by tumors. Data from these identifications allowed us to compile three independent datasets containing 103, 74, and 83 confirmed T cell antigens from cancer patients. Only 3.9%, 1.4%, and between 0% and 7.2% of these truly immunogenic antigens are produced by PCPS, therefore providing a marginal contribution to the pool of immunogenic tumor antigens. We conclude that spliced peptides will not serve as a comprehensive source to expand the number of targetable antigens for immunotherapies.