ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of type 2 diabetes requires multidimensional management, with medication adherence a crucial aspect of diabetes control. However, recent rigorous estimates of adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) are lacking. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of adherence to OAD in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from July 2013 to April 2023. Cross-sectional studies published in English were included if they met the following criteria: (1) reported the adherence to OAD using a validated measure; and (2) had a sample size of at least 385 patients with type 2 diabetes. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for studies reporting prevalence data was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Pooled estimates of the prevalence of adherence to OAD were calculated as a percentage together with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using a random-effect model. All analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0; PROSPERO (CRD42023414264). RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving a total of 69,366 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall estimated prevalence of adherence to OAD was 55.53% (95%CI: 44.22%-66.85%). Among the included studies, nine were deemed to be of high quality. A sensitivity analysis conducted using only the high-quality studies revealed a prevalence of adherence to OAD at 52.24% (95% CI: 39.63%-64.85%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of adherence to OAD was remarkably low among type 2 diabetes patients worldwide. Healthcare practitioners and policy makers should employ appropriate approaches to improve adherence to OAD.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Psychosocial approaches are the hallmark of treatment for harmful alcohol use. However, the most effective psychosocial intervention has not been identified. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of psychosocial therapy for harmful alcohol use using a network meta-analysis approach. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses from inception to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials in adults aged > 18 years with harmful alcohol use were included. Psychosocial interventions were classified using the theme, intensity, and provider/platform (TIP) framework. The mean differences (MD) of the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) score were estimated in the primary analysis using a random-effects model. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) methods were used to rank different interventions. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) approach. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022328972). RESULTS: A total of 4225 records were retrieved from searches; 19 trials (n = 7149) met the inclusion criteria. The most common TIP combination was brief interventions delivered once via face-to-face sessions (six studies) and 11 TIP features were included in the network meta-analysis. A significant difference in AUDIT score was evident among 16 of 55 treatment comparisons, with the highest effect size observed when motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy in multiple sessions via face-to-face (MI-CBT/Mult/F2F) was compared with usual care [MD = -4.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -7.04, -2.91]. This finding was consistent with SUCRA, which suggested that MI-CBT/Mult/F2F is most likely to be better than other interventions (SUCRA = 91.3). MI-CBT/Mult/F2F remained the highest-ranking intervention in our sensitivity analyses (SUCRA = 64.9, 80.8). However, the certainty of evidence for most treatment comparisons was low. CONCLUSIONS: Combined psychosocial intervention with a more intensive approach may provide greater effect in reducing harmful alcohol consumption behavior.