Sleep duration differences between children of migrant and native origins.

AIM: To explore whether primary school children of migrant and native Dutch origins differ regarding their sleep duration per night, a risk for overweight and obesity, and to determine to what degree differences in parenting styles contribute to these differences. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey, including 1,943 children aged 8-9 years old and their primary caregivers, was performed. Data were collected from primary schools in cities and adjacent municipalities in The Netherlands: Eindhoven and Rotterdam. The outcome measure was mean sleep duration per night. The main independent variable was migrant background, based on the country of birth of the parents. A possible mediating variable was parenting style (rejecting, neglecting, permissive, authoritarian, authoritative). Age and sex of the child as well as parental socioeconomic status, as indicated by educational level, were added as confounders. RESULTS: Dutch children have the highest sleep duration: more than 11 h (mean = 670.1; SD = 27.7). All migrant children show less than 11 h of sleep per night. Migrant children of non-Western origin, especially Turkish and Moroccan children, show the lowest sleep duration per night. Parenting styles do not contribute to these differences. CONCLUSION: Migrant background is associated with sleep duration. As children of migrant origin are, in general, at higher risk for overweight and obesity and sleep duration is regarded as a risk factor for overweight and obesity, further investigation of this association is needed.

The use of outpatient mental health care services of migrants vis-a-vis Dutch natives: equal access?

BACKGROUND: Although the use of outpatient mental health care services by migrants in the Netherlands has increased in recent years, whether it aligns with the need for care is unclear. AIMS: To investigate ethnic-related differences in utilization in outpatient mental health care, taking need into account, and to examine whether socio-economic or cultural barriers explain such differences. METHODS: Data for the native population was taken from the second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (N = 7,772). An additional random sample was drawn (N = 1,305) from four migrant groups (Surinamese, Dutch Antilleans, Moroccans and Turks) living in the Netherlands. Participants were surveyed on mental health care utilization, indicators of need, educational level, proficiency in Dutch and acculturation. RESULTS: Use of outpatient mental health care was about 5% for the indigenous population. Among migrants, percentages of use ranged from 6.5% (Moroccans) to 9.0% (Turks). Corrected for need, however, all non-Dutch groups had a lower chance of service utilization than the native group. Acculturation predicted utilization but did not explain all ethnic-related differences; proficiency in Dutch and health beliefs were not explanatory factors. CONCLUSIONS: In non-Dutch-speaking migrant groups, utilization is about half the level of the native Dutch, suggesting that a substantial gap exists. Our study found that acculturation only partially explains the differences.

Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Despite compulsory health insurance in Europe, ethnic differences in access to health care exist. The objective of this study is to investigate how ethnic differences between Dutch and non-Dutch women with respect to late entry into antenatal care provided by community midwifes can be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Data were obtained from the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the city of Rotterdam. In total, 2,093 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Cape Verdean, Antillean, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani background were included in this study. We examined whether ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry could be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent role of explanatory variables in the timing of antenatal care entry. The main outcome measure was late entry into antenatal care (gestational age at first visit after 14 weeks). With the exception of Surinamese-Hindustani women, the percentage of mothers entering antenatal care late was higher in all non-Dutch compared to Dutch mothers. We could explain differences between Turkish (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.57-1.58), Cape Verdean (OR = 1.65. CI: 0.96-2.82) and Dutch women. Other differences diminished but remained significant (Moroccan: OR = 1,74, CI: 1.07-2.85; Dutch Antillean OR 1.80, CI: 1.04-3.13). We found that non-Dutch mothers were more likely to enter antenatal care later than Dutch mothers. Because we are unable to explain fully the differences regarding Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole and Antillean women, future research should focus on differences between 1st and 2nd generation migrants, as well as on language barriers that may hinder access to adequate information about the Dutch obstetric system.

Treatment adherence therapy in people with psychotic disorders: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Interventions to improve adherence to treatment in people with psychotic disorders have produced inconclusive results. We developed a new treatment, treatment adherence therapy (TAT), whose intervention modules are tailored to the reasons for an individual's non-adherence. AIMS: To examine the effectiveness of TAT with regard to service engagement and medication adherence in out-patients with psychotic disorders who engage poorly. METHOD: Randomised controlled study of TAT v. treatment as usual (TAU) in 109 out-patients. Most outcome measurements were performed by masked assessors. We used intention-to-treat multivariate analyses (Dutch Trial Registry: NTR1159). RESULTS: Treatment adherence therapy v. TAU significantly benefited service engagement (Cohen's d = 0.48) and medication adherence (Cohen's d = 0.43). Results remained significant at 6-month follow-up for medication adherence. Near-significant effects were also found regarding involuntary readmissions (1.9% v. 11.8%, P = 0.053). Symptoms and quality of life did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment adherence therapy helps improve engagement and adherence, and may prevent involuntary admission.

Common mental disorders and use of general health services: a review of the literature on population-based studies.

OBJECTIVE: To review population-based studies on the association between common mental disorders and the use of general (non-mental) health care services. METHOD: Literature search in Medline and PsychLit databases. Only studies with a prospective design and correction for somatic morbidity were included for review. RESULTS: On the most general level of outcomes considered and in the majority of studies, mental disorders were associated with higher service use. This general tendency is not consistently reflected in the use of specific health care services, but is materialized in different patterns of out-patient and in-patient service utilization, which vary from study to study. Findings for the elderly were less clear-cut than for other age groups. CONCLUSION: Mental disorders are related to higher general health care service use on a global, aggregated level. These associations are not specific for certain types of services.

Chronic conditions, psychological distress and the use of psychoactive medications.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether number and type of chronic conditions are related to psychological distress, fatigue, and the use of psychoactive medications. METHODS: Data were taken from a community-based sample of adults who had responded to a health survey mailing (N = 9428). Chronic conditions were assessed by self-report. Information on the use of psychoactive medications was extracted from a claims database of prescribed drugs. Chronic conditions were compared controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS: Strong associations were found between the number of chronic conditions, on the one hand, and psychological distress and fatigue, on the other. There was a less strong association between these factors and the use of medication for anxiety and stress, the use of sleeping pills or tranquilizers, and the use of antidepressants. There was only a partial association between type of condition, psychological distress, and fatigue. Migraine had the broadest impact, having an effect on psychological distress and fatigue and on the use of anxiolytics, as well as the use of antidepressants. CONCLUSION: The association of chronic conditions with psychological distress, fatigue, and the use of psychoactive medications appeared to be related more to the number of conditions than to the type of condition.

[Guidelines and their observance in the psychiatric care of failed suicides in general hospitals]. / Richtlijnen en naleving daarvan bij de psychiatrische opvang van suïcidepogers in algemene ziekenhuizen.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the guidelines established for the care of failed suicides in general hospitals, and into the degree to which these guidelines are observed in practice. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective. SETTING: Department of Psychiatry, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. METHOD: An inventory of guidelines for the care of failed suicides was made by interviewing seven psychiatrists on the staff of general hospitals. The inventory was limited to access (interval between admission and referral/consultation), and the coordination of the care (i.e. adjustment to the patient's condition, transfer of information). Subsequently, the cases of all failed suicides admitted to these hospitals in 1991 were studied to find out how these guidelines were observed in practice; use was made for this purpose of data from a more extensive European study. RESULTS: All seven hospitals proved to have rules for coping with tailed suicides. Guidelines concerning accessibility of care were fairly similar in the various hospitals; regarding the coordination of care, more local variants were found to exist. The accessibility of care was found to be mostly in accordance with the guidelines. There were more deviations from the guidelines where the coordination of care was concerned; in addition, there were substantial differences between the hospitals in the degrees to which deviation from the guidelines occurred. CONCLUSION: Guidelines for the care of failed suicides admitted to general hospitals were not in all respects similar; the observance differed markedly, especially regarding the coordination of care.

Supervised integrated screening of low-back pain patients by a neurologist. A randomized clinical trial.

In a randomized, controlled design, the effect of psychiatric consultation intervention in medical outpatients with low-back pain (N = 104) was assessed for the patients' subjective well-being and satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) in their cooperation with the neurologists. The goal of the intervention was an integrated approach towards the patients' symptoms and the improvement of the cooperation between primary and secondary medical health services. The intervention was designed at the health care provider level; the psychiatrist did not see or examine the patient. The 104 patients were subdivided into an intervention group (N = 50) and a control group (N = 54). The major outcome measures were the psychological status of the patient and degree of the GPs' satisfaction concerning the cooperation with the medical specialists. After 6 months follow-up, there was a greater overall decline of symptoms in the patient intervention group compared with the control group. However, it was not possible to specify this effect. Contrary to the hypotheses, GPs in the control group were as satisfied about the cooperation with the neurologist as their colleagues in the intervention group. Yet, the information in the specialists' letters of the intervention group was more often in agreement with the integrated model carried out. It is concluded that great diversity of the target group of patients and the focus on the neurologists' behavior may explain the lack of hypothesized effects. It is recommended that the target group be more specifically defined, and that a more intensive intervention might prove to be more effective.

Effects of psychiatric consultation on medical consumption in medical outpatients with low back pain.

A randomized, controlled, clinical trial (N = 104) was conducted to test the hypothesis that a protocol of collaboration and communication between neurologist and general practitioner, sustained with psychiatric consultation, would reduce medical consumption (especially of diagnostic procedures and medication) in medical outpatients with low back pain. The intervention was designed at the health care provider level; the psychiatrist did not see or examine the patient. A reduction in medical consumption could not be demonstrated. As there was a great variation in adherence to the protocol in the experimental group, this might explain the lack of hypothesized effects. Full implementation of the protocol seemed to imply a lower number of major surgery operations, but this effect disappeared after excluding cases with a diagnosed hernia. The possibilities for consumption reduction for three post hoc-defined patient categories (cases with hernia and chronic and nonchronic cases) and the consequences for patient selection and treatment intensity are discussed. It is concluded that the target groups should be more narrowly defined, and that a more intensive intervention might prove to be more effective.

Effects of psychiatric consultation on medical consumption in medical outpatients with abdominal pain.

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in an outpatient clinic of internal medicine to test the hypothesis that a protocol of cooperation and communication between internist and general practitioner, sustained with psychiatric consultation, would reduce medical consumption in a group of medical outpatients with abdominal pain (N = 106). A reduction in medical consumption could not be demonstrated. However, a great variation in protocol adherence was found, partly related to the severity of the psychological problems. There is some evidence that the protocol, if restricted to cases with more severe psychiatric comorbidity, might reduce medical consumption.

Psychiatric consultations in medical outpatients with abdominal pain: patient and physician effects.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a psychiatric consultation intervention in terms of changes in 1) the patients' psychological symptoms, and 2) satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) concerning their cooperation with the internists. METHOD: In a randomized controlled design, the effect of a psychiatric consultation intervention in medical outpatients with abdominal pain (n = 106) has been assessed. The goal of the intervention was 1) a holistic approach toward the patients' symptoms, and 2) the improvement of the cooperation between primary and secondary medical health services. The intervention was designed at the health care provider level; the psychiatrist did not see or examine the patient. The 106 patients were subdivided in an index group (N = 49) and a control group (N = 57). The major outcome measures were the psychological status of the patient and degree of satisfaction of the GPs about the cooperation with the medical specialists. RESULTS: At six months follow-up, there was a significantly greater decline in depressive symptoms assessed by SCL-90 in the patient index group compared with the control group. The GPs of the index group were significantly more satisfied with the cooperation and communication with the internists compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: An experimental psychiatric consultation intervention did effect the patients' well-being to a certain degree, and especially the GPs were affected in terms of satisfaction. The relevance of improving the communication between health care providers in the management of somatizing patients is discussed.