Treatment for depression following the 1996 National Depression Screening Day.

OBJECTIVE: Characteristics of the subsequent treatment received by people who screened positive for depression in the 1996 National Depression Screening Day were investigated. METHOD: A follow-up telephone survey was completed by 1,502 randomly selected participants from 2,800 sites. RESULTS: Of 927 people for whom additional evaluation was recommended, 602 (64.9%) obtained evaluations and 503 (83.6%) received treatment. Of these 503, 260 (51.7%) received psychotherapy and medication, 130 (25.8%) received medication only, and 93 (18.5%) received psychotherapy only. Compared with people without health or mental health insurance, individuals with health insurance (66.7% versus 57.5%) and mental health insurance (74.6% versus 55.3%) were more likely to comply with the recommendation to obtain follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: One-half of the people treated for depression received a combination of psychotherapy and medication. Lack of insurance was associated with not following the recommendation to obtain further evaluation and treatment.

Development of a brief screening instrument: the HANDS.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to develop a briefer screening scale of approximately 10 items which maintained the validity of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in a sample similar to that attending National Depression Screening Day (NDSD), as well as a more general audience. METHODS: We first administered 70 items from a variety of existing rating scales to 40 subjects who answered an ad for depressed subjects and 55 who answered an ad for non-depressed subjects, all of whose diagnoses were confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Based on the correlation between each item and the diagnostic criterion, we reduced the number of items to 17 which we then administered to another 45 subjects who answered an ad similar to that used for NDSD and also underwent a SCID interview. Based on these results, we arrived at the final 10-item Harvard Department of Psychiatry/NDSD scale (HANDS) with the assistance of the item-response theory. The items are scored for frequency of occurrence of each symptom over the past 2 weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 30. RESULTS: The 10-item scale (HANDS) has good internal consistency and validity: a cutpoint score of 9 or greater gave sensitivity of at least 95% in both studies. Although specificity was lower for all scales in the self-selected population, the HANDS performed at least as well as the 20-item Zung Scale, the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-II and the 15-item Hopkins Symptom Depression Checklist. CONCLUSION: The 10-item HANDS performs as well as other widely used longer self-report scales and has the advantage of briefer administration time.

Effectiveness of community-based screening for depression.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of a voluntary depression screening program was assessed by determining 1) whether participants in the 1994 National Depression Screening Day went for recommended follow-up examinations and 2) the characteristics that differentiated those who did and did not return. METHOD: Randomly selected participants (N = 1,169) from 99 facilities completed a follow-up telephone survey. RESULTS: Of 805 people for whom follow-up was recommended, 56.5% (N = 455) went for an appointment. The severity of depressive symptoms in these subjects ranged from severe (33.4%, N = 152) and marked (41.3%, N = 188) to minimal (17.1%, N = 78) and normal (8.1%, N = 37). Subjects with marked or severe depression were more likely to respond to the screening recommendation than were those with minimal depressive symptoms. However, at each level of symptom severity, subjects who had received previous treatment were more likely to adhere to the screening recommendation than were those with no previous treatment. Of those who returned for a recommended follow-up, 72.1% were diagnosed with depression. Of those who did not return, 29.5% cited lack of insurance, under insurance, or inadequate finances, and 38.0% felt they could "handle" depression on their own. CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary screening for depression is an effective way to bring certain untreated depressed individuals to treatment. Inadequate insurance and the belief that individuals can manage depression on their own continue to be barriers to seeking treatment among some depressed individuals who attend a depression screening program.

Who comes to a voluntary depression screening program?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe who comes to a voluntary depression screening program by analyzing findings from the 1992 National Depression Screening Day. METHOD: Survey results from 5,367 adult volunteers at 345 facilities were analyzed. The authors examined the prevalence of depression detected at the screening test and sociodemographic characteristics and treatment history of the respondents. They also estimated the percentage of these individuals who would actually have a diagnosis of major depression (positive predictive value). The main assessment measure was the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. RESULTS: Of all participants, 76.6% (N = 4,109) had at least minimal depressive symptoms (score of at least 50 on the Zung depression scale), 53.3% (N = 2,859) had at least moderate symptoms (score of at least 60), and 22.6% (N = 1,214) had severe symptoms (score of at least 70). Few of the depressed respondents were currently in treatment for a mental health problem. The positive predictive value of a screening test diagnosis of depression was between 92.5% and 95.5% when a cutoff score of 60 was used to indicate depression and between 88.7% and 92.3% when a cutoff score of 50 was used. CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary screening tests, as exemplified by results from the National Depression Screening Day, provide a good opportunity for identifying previously unidentified and untreated individuals with depression.