Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Vet Res ; 59(12): 1575-8, 1998 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9858409

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine efficacy of orally administered Brucella abortus vaccine strain RB51 against virulent B abortus challenge exposure in cattle as a model for vaccination of wild ungulates. ANIMALS: 20 mixed-breed beef cattle obtained from a brucellosis-free herd. PROCEDURE: Sexually mature, Brucella-negative beef heifers were vaccinated by mixing > 10' viable RB51 organisms or diluent with their feed. Heifers were fed individually and consumed their entire ration. Each heifer received approximately 3 X 10' colony-forming units (CFU). Six weeks after oral vaccination, heifers were pasture-bred to brucellosis-free bulls. At approximately 186 days' gestation, heifers were challenge exposed conjunctively with 107 CFU of virulent B abortus strain 2308. RESULTS: Vaccination with the rough variant of B abortus RB51 did not stimulate antibodies against the O-polysaccharide (OPS) of B abortus. After challenge exposure and parturition, strain 2308 was recovered from 80% of controls and only 20% of vaccinates. Only 30% of the vaccinates delivered dead, premature, or weak calves, whereas 70% of the controls had dead or weak calves. CONCLUSIONS: Cattle vaccinated orally with the rough variant of B abortus strain RB51 develop significant (P < 0.05) protection against abortion and colonization and do not produce OPS-specific antibodies. Clinical Relevance-Results encourage further investigation into use of strain RB51 to vaccinate wild ungulates (elk and bison) orally.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Veterinary/prevention & control , Bacterial Vaccines , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antibody Formation , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Brucella abortus/pathogenicity , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Cattle , Female , Labor, Obstetric , Pregnancy , Virulence
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 57(5): 677-83, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8723881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stable rough mutants derived from Brucella melitensis 16M and B suis 2579 (biovar 4) as vaccines against homologous and heterologous Brucella spp in the BALB/c mouse model. DESIGN, ANIMALS, AND PROCEDURE: Rough mutants VTRM1 and VTRS1 were obtained from B melitensis 16M and B suis 2579, respectively, by allelic exchange of rfbU gene encoding mannosyltransferase with a Tn5-disrupted rfbU gene. Mice were vaccinated with VTRM1 or VTRS1 and challenge exposed 8 weeks later. RESULTS: VTRM1 and VTRS1 replicated extensively in the spleen during the first 3 weeks of infection, then decreased rapidly. Antibodies specific for the O polysaccharide were not detected in sera of mice inoculated with either rough strain. Vaccination with VTRM1 or VTRS1 induced protection against virulent strains of B abortus (2308), B melitensis (16M), B suis biovar 1 (750), and B suis biovar 4 (2579). VTRM1 also protected against B ovis (PA) and against 4 field isolates of B abortus from bison or elk. VTRS1 conferred protection against 4 field isolates of B suis biovar 4 from reindeer. Vaccines prepared from live VTRM1 or VTRS1 provided significantly greater protection than that afforded by vaccines of killed cells in QS-21 adjuvant. Vaccination with VTRM1 containing VTRS1 gave minimal protection against the antigenically unrelated Listeria monocytogenes, thus demonstrating the immunologic specificity of protection against Brucella spp. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results encourage evaluation, in primary host species, of VTRM1 and VTRS1, along with RB51, as alternative vaccines to strain 19, Rev 1, or other smooth phase vaccines.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucella/immunology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Mice, Inbred BALB C/immunology , Rodent Diseases/prevention & control , Alleles , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Bison , Blotting, Western/veterinary , Brucella/genetics , Brucella melitensis/genetics , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Cattle , Deer , Female , Listeria monocytogenes/immunology , Mice , Mutation , Reindeer , Rodent Diseases/immunology , Swine , Vaccines, Attenuated/pharmacology
3.
J Wildl Dis ; 26(3): 360-71, 1990 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2117675

ABSTRACT

Two groups of six, non-brucellosis vaccinated, brucellosis seronegative pregnant American bison (Bison bison) were individually challenged with 1 x 10(7) colony forming units (CFU) of Brucella abortus strain 2308. Three days after challenge, each bison group was placed in a common paddock with six non-vaccinated, brucellosis susceptible, pregnant domestic heifers. In a parallel study, two groups of six susceptible, pregnant cattle were simultaneously challenged with the identical dose as the bison and each group was placed with six susceptible cattle in order to compare bison to cattle transmission to that observed in cattle to cattle transmission. Blood samples were collected from bison and cattle weekly for at least 1 mo prior to exposure to B. abortus and for 180 days post-exposure (PE). Sera from the bison and cattle were evaluated by the Card, rivanol precipitation, standard plate agglutination, standard tube agglutination, cold complement fixation tube, warm complement fixation tube, buffered acidified plate antigen, rapid screening, bovine conjugated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, bison or bovine conjugated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and the hemolysis-in-gel techniques for the presence of antibodies to Brucella spp. At the termination of pregnancy by abortion or birth of a live-calf, quarter milk samples, vaginal swabs, and placenta were collected from the dam. Rectal swabs were collected from live calves, and mediastinal lymph nodes, abomasal contents and lung were taken at necropsy from aborted fetuses for culture of Brucella spp. These tissues and swabs were cultured on restrictive media for the isolation and identification of Brucella spp. Pathogenesis of brucellosis in bison was studied in an additional group of six pregnant bison which were challenged with 1 x 10(7) CFU of B. abortus strain 2308. One animal was euthanatized each week PE. Tissues were collected at necropsy and later examined bacteriologically and histologically. Lesions of brucellosis in bison did not significantly differ grossly or histologically from those in cattle. There were six abortions and two nonviable calves in the bison group, as compared to nine abortions in the 12 similarly inoculated cattle. As determined by bacterial isolations, transmission of B. abortus from bison to cattle (five of 12 susceptible cattle became infected) did not differ statistically from cattle to cattle transmission (six of 12 susceptible cattle became infected) under identical conditions. No single serologic test was constantly reliable to diagnosing B. abortus infected bison for 8 wk PE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Artiodactyla , Brucellosis, Bovine/transmission , Brucellosis/veterinary , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/veterinary , Agglutination Tests , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucellosis/transmission , Brucellosis, Bovine/microbiology , Cattle , Complement Fixation Tests , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Hemolytic Plaque Technique , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...