Radiotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combinations in lung cancer: building better translational research platforms.

Despite the unheralded success of immune checkpoint blockade in delivering durable responses for some patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of patients do not respond. PD-L1 tumour expression and pre-existing tumour T-cell infiltration have been correlated with improved clinical outcomes to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1. However, patients with tumours that are negative for PD-L1 expression can also respond to treatment. Strategies to combine other treatment modalities like radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated as means of improving the response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 antibody blockade. RT induces immunogenic changes in cancer cells, can adaptively upregulate tumour cell PD-L1 expression and can improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. How we design future clinical trials in NSCLC also depends on practical considerations of delivering these treatment combinations, such as RT dose, fractionation and field volume, as well as scheduling with immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we review reasons for resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and how RT may be utilised in combination with these drugs to enhance their effect by building better translational research platforms.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer - An Unheralded Opportunity?

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for 85% of the disease. Over 70% of patients present with locally advanced, non-resectable or metastatic disease and despite improvements in chemoradiotherapy regimens and the development of molecularly targeted agents, 5 year survival rates remain poor, with acquired resistance to novel targeted therapies becoming a growing concern. Currently there remains an unmet need in effectively treating and inducing durable responses in advanced disease. Targeting the immune system has, however, recently given hope of improving therapeutic outcomes for these patients. The notion that the immune system is capable of recognising and eliminating cancer cells is now a widely accepted phenomenon and growing evidence suggests lung cancer is an attractive target for such intervention. Recent success targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis of immune checkpoint inhibition suggests a major immunotherapeutic advance in treating lung cancer and unheralded opportunity for such approaches to further improve outcome for patients. Currently there is considerable interest in combining anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies with established standard of care therapies such as radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is known to be immunostimulatory and efforts are underway to combine and augment the efficacy of the immune checkpoint inhibitors further. This review outlines the interaction between lung cancer and the immune system, summarises current evidence supporting the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 axis in lung cancer and explores the potential of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy to augment anti-tumour immune responses.

Sanctuary site leptomeningeal metastases in HER-2 positive breast cancer: A review in the era of trastuzumab.

The development of trastuzumab and other targeted systemic therapies has transformed the management of HER-2 positive breast cancers. However, as patients live longer and systemic therapies may not cross the blood brain barrier a rising number of patients are developing leptomeningeal metastases and brain metastases as a sanctuary site of disease. Intrathecal trastuzumab has been reported to treat these. We describe a breast cancer patient with HER-2 positive leptomeningeal disease in the spinal cord successfully treated with intrathecal trastuzumab and methotrexate, alongside systemic anti-HER-2 therapy and radiotherapy. We also review the literature to date on the efficacy and safety of intrathecal trastuzumab, and recent evidence suggesting that intrathecal trastuzumab passes via the blood brain barrier into the serum to achieve intravenous concentrations similar to that seen with systemic therapy alone. Overall, intrathecal trastuzumab appears to be a safe and often effective treatment for leptomeningeal metastases in HER-2 positive breast cancer. Ongoing phase I and II studies are required to determine optimum dosing schedules, validate CSF and CSF-to-serum pharmacokinetics, determine efficacy, and to assess the added benefits or disadvantages of prior radiotherapy and concomitant systemic therapy.

In-depth analysis of delays to patient discharge: a metropolitan teaching hospital experience.

Delayed patient discharge will likely exacerbate bed shortages. This study prospectively determined the frequency, causes and potential cost implications of delays for 83 consecutive patients, who were inpatients for a total of 888 days. 65% of patients experienced delay whilst awaiting a service. 48% of patients experienced delays that extended their discharge date. Discharge delays accounted for 21% of the cohort's inpatient stay, at an estimated cost of 565 sterling pounds per patient; 77% of these hold-ups resulted from delays in the provision of social and therapy requirements. Discharge delays are costly for hospitals and depressing for patients. Investment is required to enable health and social-care professionals to work more closely to improve the patient journey.