Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Anesth Analg ; 133(1): e12, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127602
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 44: 272-276, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32317200

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to provide physician-level data about the frequency of critical procedures at a combined adult and pediatric Level I trauma center, high-acuity, high-volume academic ED. The inspiration for this study question came from a previous study by Mittiga et al. (2013) describing pediatric critical procedure data at a similar high-acuity, high-volume, pediatric-only academic ED. Our secondary objective is to compare our pediatric level procedural spectrum and frequency with those published by Mittiga et al. (2013). METHODS: This prospective observational study occurred over eleven consecutive months at an urban, Level I combined adult/pediatric trauma center with 96,000 annual visits (8500 pediatric). We recorded only procedures performed in the resuscitation bays. All data analysis is descriptive. RESULTS: Over eleven months, data on 3891 resuscitations were collected (3686 adults and 205 children); 38 faculty physicians supervised 1838 total critical procedures, 64 on children. The mean number of critical procedures per physician per month was 4.42 (0.15 on children). Additionally, ultrasound for intravenous access, extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (e-FAST), or cardiac ultrasound were performed in 3862 resuscitations (178 pediatric). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine faculty physicians at a combined Level I adult and pediatric trauma center performed and/or supervised 4.4 total (0.15 pediatric) critical procedures per month per faculty which is nearly 6 times more critical procedures monthly than faculty at a similar volume pediatric-only trauma center. However, fewer critical procedures were performed on children at the combined facility.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers , Child , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
3.
Anesth Analg ; 132(2): 395-405, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060492

ABSTRACT

Multiple international airway societies have created guidelines for the management of the difficult airway. In critically ill patients, there are physiologic derangements beyond inadequate airway protection or hypoxemia. These risk factors contribute to the "physiologically difficult airway" and are associated with complications including cardiac arrest and death. Importantly, they are largely absent from international guidelines. Thus, we created management recommendations for the physiologically difficult airway to provide practical guidance for intubation in the critically ill. Through multiple rounds of in-person and telephone conferences, a multidisciplinary working group of 12 airway specialists (Society for Airway Management's Special Projects Committee) over a time period of 3 years (2016-2019) reviewed airway physiology topics in a modified Delphi fashion. Consensus agreement with the following recommendations among working group members was generally high with 80% of statements showing agreement within a 10% range on a sliding scale from 0% to 100%. We limited the scope of this analysis to reflect the resources and systems of care available to out-of-operating room adult airway providers. These recommendations reflect the practical application of physiologic principles to airway management available during the analysis time period.


Subject(s)
Airway Management/standards , Critical Illness/therapy , Airway Management/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/standards , Patient Positioning/standards , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
4.
J Addict Med ; 11(2): 157-160, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166084

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Levamisole-adulterated cocaine has been implicated in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis. We present a case of spontaneous intraperitoneal hemorrhage, an unexpectedly severe complication of cocaine-related ANCA vasculitis, developing late during hospitalization. CASE REPORT: An adult male with a history of hepatitis C, distant cocaine use, and limited health care presented to a local emergency department (ED) with volume overload, renal failure, hyperkalemia and non-anion gap metabolic acidosis. An extensive workup ensued, followed by pulse-dose methylprednisolone and plasma exchange for ANCA vasculitis with crescentic glomerulonephritis. Tachycardia and hypertension persisted throughout hospitalization despite treatment. On hospital day (HD) 13, his abdomen became distended and tender. Mental status and blood pressure declined, and he was emergently intubated. Paracentesis revealed frank blood; hemoglobin declined from 10.6 to 4.6 g/dL during 10 hours. Laparotomy revealed 3.5 L of intraperitoneal blood and a bleeding omental vessel. Histopathology revealed necrotic aneurysmal dilatation diagnostic of systemic vasculitis. Urine cocaine metabolite was positive on HD #13, consistent with the patient's report of in-hospital cocaine use. He was discharged on HD #28 without further complications with plans for outpatient hemodialysis. DISCUSSION: ANCA vasculitis is widely reported following levamisole-adulterated cocaine use. Catastrophic in-hospital hemorrhage due to ANCA vasculitis and vascular necrosis, though previously unreported, may occur with ongoing cocaine use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/chemically induced , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/complications , Antirheumatic Agents/toxicity , Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Levamisole/toxicity , Adult , Drug Contamination , Humans , Male
5.
J Emerg Med ; 52(4): 403-408, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27876327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Removal of a functioning King laryngeal tube (LT) prior to establishing a definitive airway increases the risk of a "can't intubate, can't oxygenate" scenario. We previously described a technique utilizing video laryngoscopy (VL) and a bougie to intubate around a well-seated King LT with the balloons deflated; if necessary, the balloons can be rapidly re-inflated and ventilation resumed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to provide preliminary validation of this technique. METHODS: Emergency physicians performed all orotracheal intubations in this two-part study. Part 1 consisted of a historical analysis of VL recordings from emergency department (ED) patients intubated with the King LT in place over a two-year period at our institution. In Part 2, we analyzed VL recordings from paired attempts at intubating a cadaver, first with a King LT in place and then with the device removed, with each physician serving as his or her own control. The primary outcome for all analyses was first-pass success. RESULTS: There were 11 VL recordings of ED patients intubated with the King LT in place (Part 1) and 11 pairs of cadaveric VL recordings (Part 2). The first-pass success rate was 100% in both parts. In Part 1, the median time to intubation was 43 s (interquartile range [IQR] 36-60 s). In Part 2, the median time to intubation was 23 s (IQR 18-35 s) with the King LT in place and 17 s (IQR 14-18 s) with the King LT removed. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians successfully intubated on the first attempt with the King LT in situ. The technique described in this proof-of-concept study seems promising and merits further validation.


Subject(s)
Airway Management/standards , Equipment Design/standards , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Airway Management/instrumentation , Airway Management/methods , Cadaver , Cross-Over Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Laryngoscopy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Video Recording/instrumentation , Video Recording/methods
6.
Ann Emerg Med ; 69(1): 1-6, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27522310

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Recent data suggest that emergency airway preoxygenation with a bag-valve-mask (BVM) device (held with a tight mask seal but without squeezing the bag) is superior to a nonrebreather (NRB) mask at standard oxygen flow rates. We seek to determine whether preoxygenation with an NRB mask with flush rate oxygen (>40 L/min by fully opening a standard oxygen flowmeter) is noninferior to BVM device with standard-flow oxygen (15 L/min). We also seek to compare the efficacy of preoxygenation with NRB mask at flush rate oxygen with both NRB mask with oxygen at 15 L/min and simple mask at flush rate oxygen. METHODS: We performed a crossover trial using healthy volunteers. In random sequence, subjects underwent 3-minute trials of preoxygenation with nonrebreather mask with oxygen at 15 L/min (NRB-15), nonrebreather mask with flush rate oxygen (NRB-Flush), BVM device with oxygen at 15 L/min (BVM-15), and simple mask with flush rate oxygen. The primary outcome measure was the FeO2 in a single exhaled breath. We compared the FeO2 of NRB-Flush to other study groups, using a prespecified noninferiority margin of 10%. RESULTS: We enrolled 26 subjects. Mean FeO2 values for NRB-15, NRB-Flush, BVM-15, and simple mask with flush rate oxygen were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50% to 57%), 86% (95% CI 84% to 88%), 77% (95% CI 74% to 81%), and 72% (95% CI 69% to 76%), respectively. FeO2 for NRB-Flush was noninferior to BVM-15 (difference 8%; 95% CI 5% to 11%). FeO2 for NRB-Flush was higher than both NRB-15 (FeO2 difference 32%; 95% CI 29% to 35%) and simple mask with flush rate oxygen (FeO2 difference 13%; 95% CI 10% to 17%). CONCLUSION: Preoxygenation with NRB-Flush was noninferior to BVM-15. NRB with flush rate oxygen may be a reasonable preoxygenation method for spontaneously breathing patients undergoing emergency airway management.


Subject(s)
Airway Management/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Laryngeal Masks , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Oxygen/metabolism
8.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 54(7): 556-62, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27102743

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Ketamine is an emerging drug for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the prehospital environment, however no prospective comparative studies have evaluated its effectiveness or safety in this clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized 5 mg/kg of intramuscular ketamine would be superior to 10 mg of intramuscular haloperidol for severe prehospital agitation, with time to adequate sedation as the primary outcome measure. METHODS: This was a prospective open label study of all patients in an urban EMS system requiring chemical sedation for severe acute undifferentiated agitation that were subsequently transported to the EMS system's primary Emergency Department. All paramedics were trained in the Altered Mental Status Scale and prospectively recorded agitation scores on all patients. Two 6-month periods where either ketamine or haloperidol was the first-line therapy for severe agitation were prospectively compared primarily for time to adequate sedation. Secondary outcomes included laboratory data and adverse medication events. RESULTS: 146 subjects were enrolled; 64 received ketamine, 82 received haloperidol. Median time to adequate sedation for the ketamine group was 5 minutes (range 0.4-23) vs. 17 minutes (range 2-84) in the haloperidol group (difference 12 minutes, 95% CI 9-15). Complications occurred in 49% (27/55) of patients receiving ketamine vs. 5% (4/82) in the haloperidol group. Complications specific to the ketamine group included hypersalivation (21/56, 38%), emergence reaction (5/52, 10%), vomiting (5/57, 9%), and laryngospasm (3/55, 5%). Intubation was also significantly higher in the ketamine group; 39% of patients receiving ketamine were intubated vs. 4% of patients receiving haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine is superior to haloperidol in terms of time to adequate sedation for severe prehospital acute undifferentiated agitation, but is associated with more complications and a higher intubation rate.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...