Development of clinical screening tool for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with definite chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: No simple, accurate diagnostic tests exist for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), and EPI remains underdiagnosed in chronic pancreatitis (CP). We sought to develop a digital screening tool to assist clinicians to predict EPI in patients with definite CP. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients with definite CP with/without EPI. Overall, 49 candidate predictor variables were utilized to train a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model to rank all predictors and select a parsimonious set of predictors for EPI status. Five-fold cross-validation was used to assess generalizability, and the full CART model was compared with 4 additional predictive models. EPI misclassification rate (mRate) served as primary endpoint metric. RESULTS: 274 patients with definite CP from 6 pancreatitis centers across the United States were included, of which 58 % had EPI based on predetermined criteria. The optimal CART decision tree included 10 variables. The mRate without/with 5-fold cross-validation of the CART was 0.153 (training error) and 0.314 (prediction error), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.889 and 0.682, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity without/with 5-fold cross-validation was 0.888/0.789 and 0.794/0.535, respectively. A trained second CART without pancreas imaging variables (n = 6), yielded 8 variables. Training error/prediction error was 0.190/0.351; sensitivity was 0.869/0.650, and specificity was 0.728/0.649, each without/with 5-fold cross-validation. CONCLUSION: We developed two CART models that were integrated into one digital screening tool to assess for EPI in patients with definite CP and with two to six input variables needed for predicting EPI status.

Real-World Patient Experience With Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in the Treatment of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide patients insights on the management of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of 75 members of Inspire's Pancreatitis or Pancreatic Cancer Support communities was conducted. Eligibility included having EPI secondary to chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, pancreatic surgery, or acute pancreatitis, and current/past PERT experience. RESULTS: Patients were 73% female, 57% aged 50 to 69 years, and 85% White, with PERT prescribed by a gastroenterologist/pancreatologist for 64%. Only approximately half of respondents agreed that their healthcare provider provided detailed information about EPI (54%) or how PERT works to treat EPI (56%). Most respondents (83%) reported searching for information about EPI, 56% were taking PERT solely before or after eating, 36% reported taking suboptimal PERT doses, and 39% reported no follow-up. In addition, 24% decreased their PERT dosage without consulting their physician, and 21% reported purposely skipping PERT. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals potential barriers to effective treatment of EPI with PERT, including lack of patient education, mainly how and when to take PERT, gaps in appropriate dosing, and lack of patient follow-up. Continued focus on patient and provider education is essential to address these gaps and optimize the treatment of EPI.

Early initiation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir after transplantation of HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negative recipients is associated with normalization in the altered inflammatory milieu.

Our previous Multicenter Trial to Transplant HCV-infected Kidneys (MYTHIC) observed that 100% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-uninfected patients who received a kidney from an HCV-infected deceased donor were cured of HCV with an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) initiated 2-5 days after transplantation. Following acute and chronic infection with HCV, immune system perturbations have been reported to persist even after viral clearance. The aim of this study was to determine whether HCV viremic kidney recipients in the MYTHIC study experience sustained changes in the soluble inflammatory milieu associated with HCV infection. Among nine patients with HCV viremia at day 3 post-kidney transplant (post-KT D3), IP-10, IL-10, MIP-1ß, and IL-8 were significantly elevated from baseline. However, over the subsequent visits, there was a rapid, dramatic reduction back to baseline levels. Among seven patients who were not HCV viremic at post-KT D3, the cytokine levels did not significantly change. HCV-uninfected patients who received a kidney from an HCV-viremic deceased donor and were treated with early G/P experienced only transient alterations in the soluble inflammatory milieu. These data provide reassuring evidence that there appear to be no persistent cytokine disturbances with transient HCV viremia accompanying HCV donor positive/recipient negative kidney transplant.

Characterizing complex and competing drug-drug interactions between the antiviral regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir with rifampin or carbamazepine.

The fixed-dose combination of the direct acting antivirals glecaprevir (GLE) and pibrentasvir (PIB) is an oral, once-daily treatment for all six major genotypes of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. A single and multiple-dose rifampin study (N = 12) and a carbamazepine study (N = 12) were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the effects of CYP3A/P-gp induction and OATP inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of GLE and PIB. In study 1, GLE 300 mg + PIB 120 mg was administered as a single dose either alone, after single and multiple daily doses of rifampin 600 mg, or 24 h after the last rifampin dose. In study 2, GLE 300 mg + PIB 120 mg was administered as a single dose either alone or after multiple doses of carbamazepine 200 mg. Relative to GLE + PIB alone, exposure of GLE was significantly increased by the first co-administered rifampin dose due to OATP inhibition, significantly decreased 24 h after the last rifampin dose due to CYP3A/P-gp induction, and slightly increased when co-administered with steady-state rifampin due to a combination of inhibition and induction forces. Exposure of PIB was not affected when co-administered with the first rifampin dose but was significantly decreased with steady-state rifampin co-administration, or 24 h after the last rifampin dose due to P-gp induction. Carbamazepine significantly decreased GLE and PIB exposure, mainly attributed to P-gp induction. The regimens tested were generally well-tolerated by the subjects and no new safety issues were identified.

One-Year Outcomes of the Multi-Center StudY to Transplant Hepatitis C-InfeCted kidneys (MYTHIC) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Transplanting kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors into HCV-negative patients (HCV D-RNA-positive/R-negative) has evolved from experimental to "standard-of-care" at many centers. Nevertheless, most data derive from single centers and provide only short-term follow-up. METHODS: The Multicenter Study to Transplant Hepatitis C-Infected Kidneys (MYTHIC) study was a multicenter (7 sites) trial of HCV D-RNA-positive/R-negative kidney transplantation (KT) followed by 8 weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) initiated 2 to 5 days post-KT. Prespecified outcomes included probability of KT (vs. matched waitlist comparators) and 1-year safety outcomes, allograft function, and survival. RESULTS: Among 63 enrolled patients, 1-year cumulative incidence of KT was approximately 3.5-fold greater for the MYTHIC cohort versus 2055 matched United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) comparators who did not opt-in to receive a kidney from an HCV-viremic donor (68% vs. 19%, P < 0.0001). Of 30 HCV D-RNA-positive/R-negative KT recipients, all achieved HCV cure. None developed clinically significant liver disease or HCV-related kidney injury. Furthermore, 1-year survival was 93% and 1-year graft function was excellent (median creatinine 1.17; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.02-1.38 mg/dl). There were 4 cases of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease among 10 CMV-negative patients transplanted with a kidney from an HCV-viremic/CMV-positive donor. CONCLUSION: The 1-year findings from this multicenter trial suggest that opting-in for HCV-viremic KT offers can increase probability of KT with excellent 1-year outcomes. Trial Registration: NCT03781726.

Linkage of resistance-associated substitutions in GT1 sofosbuvir + NS5A inhibitor failures treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Retreatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) resulted in a rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) of >90% in HCV genotype 1 (GT1) patients who previously failed a regimen of sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai). This study investigated the prevalence and impact of baseline NS3 and NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on the efficacy of G/P in prior GT1 sofosbuvir+NS5Ai failures and the persistence of treatment-emergent RASs. METHODS: Longitudinal samples from 177 patients enrolled in a phase IIIb, randomized pragmatic clinical trial were analyzed. Patients without cirrhosis were randomized to 12 or 16 weeks of G/P, and patients with compensated cirrhosis were randomized to G/P and ribavirin for 12 weeks or G/P for 16 weeks. Linkage of RAS was identified using Primer-ID next-generation sequencing at a 15% cut-off. RESULTS: Of 177 patients, 169 (95.5%) were PI-naïve. All 33 GT1b-infected patients achieved SVR12. In GT1a-infected patients, baseline NS5A RASs were prevalent (74.5%, 105/141) but NS3 RASs were uncommon. Baseline NS3 RASs had no impact on G/P efficacy and patients with baseline NS5A RASs showed a numerically but not statistically significantly lower SVR12 rate compared to those without NS5A RASs (89% vs. 97%). SVR12 was achieved in 34 of 35 (97%) patients without NS5A baseline substitution, and 53 of 57 (93%), 35 of 40 (88%), 5 of 8 (63%) with single, double-linked, and triple-linked NS5A substitutions, respectively. Among 13 patients with virologic failure, 4 acquired treatment-emergent NS3 RASs and 10 acquired NS5A RASs. CONCLUSION: Baseline NS5A RASs were highly prevalent. The presence of an increasing number of linked NS5A RASs in GT1a showed a trend in decreasing SVR12 rates, although no specific NS5A RASs or their linkage pattern were associated with lower SVR12 rates. LAY SUMMARY: Direct-acting antivirals have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection, but treatment failure occurs in some patients. Retreatment of patients who previously failed a regimen consisting of sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor with a regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) is >90% effective. Herein, we analyzed samples from these patients and showed that retreatment efficacy with G/P is lower in patients with double- or triple-linked NS5A resistance mutations than in patients with single or no NS5A resistance mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03092375.

Multicenter Study to Transplant Hepatitis C-Infected Kidneys (MYTHIC): An Open-Label Study of Combined Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir to Treat Recipients of Transplanted Kidneys from Deceased Donors with Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

BACKGROUND: Single-center trials and retrospective case series have reported promising outcomes using kidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, multicenter trials are needed to determine if those findings are generalizable. METHODS: We conducted a prospective trial at seven centers to transplant 30 kidneys from deceased donors with HCV viremia into HCV-uninfected recipients, followed by 8 weeks of once-daily coformulated glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, targeted to start 3 days posttransplant. Key outcomes included sustained virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir), adverse events, and allograft function. RESULTS: We screened 76 patients and enrolled 63 patients, of whom 30 underwent kidney transplantation from an HCV-viremic deceased donor (median kidney donor profile index, 53%) in May 2019 through October 2019. The median time between consent and transplantation of a kidney from an HCV-viremic donor was 6.3 weeks. All 30 recipients achieved a sustained virologic response. One recipient died of complications of sepsis 4 months after achieving a sustained virologic response. No severe adverse events in any patient were deemed likely related to HCV infection or treatment with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Three recipients developed acute cellular rejection, which was borderline in one case. Three recipients developed polyomavirus (BK) viremia near or >10,000 copies/ml that resolved after reduction of immunosuppression. All recipients had good allograft function, with a median creatinine of 1.2 mg/dl and median eGFR of 57 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter trial demonstrated safety and efficacy of transplantation of 30 HCV-viremic kidneys into HCV-negative recipients, followed by early initiation of an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir.

Effectiveness of 8-Week Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Treatment-Naïve, Compensated Cirrhotic Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) was approved on 26 September 2019 by the US Food and Drug Administration for 8-week duration in treatment-naïve (TN) hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC). Evidence from the EXPEDITION-8 study demonstrated that 8 weeks of G/P achieved a 98% intent-to-treat (ITT) sustained virologic response rate 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12) in 343 TN/CC patients. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the first US real-world effectiveness of G/P 8-week treatment in genotype 1-6 TN/CC HCV patients. METHODS: Data from 73 TN/CC patients who initiated 8 weeks of G/P treatment between August 2017 and November 2018 were collected electronically from providers and specialty pharmacies of the Trio Health network and analyzed. Cirrhosis was determined by FIB-4 > 5.2 or was physician reported. The primary outcome was Per Protocol (PP) SVR12. RESULTS: The majority (60%) of patients were male, with (mean values): age 59 years, body mass index (BMI) of 30, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 105, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 101 IU/ml. HCV genotypes (GT) were: GT1 81% (59/73), GT2 10% (7/73), GT3 5% (4/73), GT4 3% (2/73), and GT6 1% (1/73). Eight percent (6/73) of patients had concurrent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and 15% (11/72) had a baseline viral load > 6 MM IU/ml. Zero patients discontinued, two patients were reported as lost to follow-up, and there was one virologic failure. PP sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) rate was 99% (70/71), and the intent-to-treat (ITT) SVR12 rate was 96% (70/73). CONCLUSIONS: Early real-world experience indicates high effectiveness of the 8-week G/P regimen in a diverse treatment-naïve, compensated cirrhotic US population.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir Coadministered With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antiretrovirals.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients coinfected with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency viruses (HCV; HIV) requires careful consideration of potential drug-drug interactions between HCV direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) and HIV antiretrovirals. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a fixed-dose combination of an NS3/4A protease inhibitor and an NS5A inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection, including patients with HIV coinfection. METHODS: A series of phase 1 studies was conducted to evaluate potential interactions of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine, raltegravir, rilpivirine, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, or efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Pharmacokinetics of the antiretrovirals and DAAs were characterized when administered alone and in combination to quantify changes in systemic drug exposure. RESULTS: Glecaprevir area under the curve increased >4-fold in the presence of ritonavir-boosted HIV protease inhibitors, while pibrentasvir concentrations were not significantly affected; elevations in alanine transaminase occurred in combination with atazanavir/ritonavir only. Exposures of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir may be significantly decreased by efavirenz. Coadministration with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir did not result in clinically significant changes in the exposure of any antiretroviral agents. CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir is contraindicated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and use of boosted protease inhibitors or efavirenz is not recommended. No clinically significant interactions were observed with other studied antiretrovirals.

Efficacy of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Patients With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection With Treatment Failure After NS5A Inhibitor Plus Sofosbuvir Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment options are limited for patients with hepatitis C (HCV) infection with treatment failure after sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor. There are some data for the efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in these patients. We performed a randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of 12 and 16 weeks of G/P, with or without ribavirin, in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection with treatment failure after sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor. METHODS: We performed a phase 3b, open-label study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who received previous treatment with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor. Patients without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups that received G/P for 12 weeks (n = 78, group A) or 16 weeks (n = 49, group B). Patients with compensated cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups that received G/P and ribavirin for 12 weeks (n = 21, group C) or G/P for 16 weeks (n = 29, group D). The primary end point was a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment. Samples collected at baseline and at time of treatment failure were sequenced for resistance-associated substitutions in NS3 and NS5A. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients in the 4 groups, 81% were men, 79% had HCV genotype 1a infection, and 44% were black. Proportions of patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in groups A, B, C, and D were 90%, 94%, 86%, and 97%, respectively. The treatment failed in 13 (7.3%) patients with HCV genotype 1a infection, 6 (7.9%) in group A, 3 (6.1%) in group B, 3 (6.1%) in group C (6.1%), and 1 (3.4%) in group D. Most patients had baseline resistance-associated substitutions in NS5A. Treatment-emergent resistance-associated substitutions in NS3 and NS5A were observed in 9 and 10 patients with treatment failure, respectively. G/P was well tolerated. Ribavirin increased adverse events but did not increase efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who received previous treatment with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor, 16 weeks treatment with G/P produced sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in >90% of patients, including those with compensated cirrhosis. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03092375.

Translation of In Vitro Transport Inhibition Studies to Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions for Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir.

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are oral direct-acting antiviral agents approved in combination for treatment of chronic hepatitis C viral infection. In vitro studies identified the combination as potentially clinically relevant inhibitors of the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and the hepatic uptake transporters organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and OATP1B3. Glecaprevir inhibited P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 with IC50 values of 0.33, 2.3, 0.017, and 0.064 µM, respectively. Pibrentasvir inhibited P-gp, BCRP, and OATP1B1 with IC50 values of 0.036, 14, and 1.3 µM, respectively. Neither agent inhibited organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, organic anion transporter (OAT) 1, OAT3, multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1, or MATE2K. Open-label phase 1 clinical drug-drug interaction studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate interaction potential of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and coadministered selective substrates for P-gp (digoxin, dabigatran etexilate, and sofosbuvir), BCRP (rosuvastatin and sofosbuvir), and OATP1B1/3 (pravastatin and rosuvastatin). The pharmacokinetic maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) parameters were evaluated for probe substrates alone and in combination with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The C max central values increased by 72%, 105%, 123%, 462%, and 66% for digoxin, dabigatran, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and sofosbuvir, respectively, and the AUC central values increased by 48%, 138%, 130%, 115%, and 125% for digoxin, dabigatran, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and sofosbuvir, respectively. Exposure of sofosbuvir metabolite GS-331007 (nucleoside analog) was similar with or without glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The outcomes of the clinical drug-drug interaction studies confirmed clinically relevant inhibition of P-gp, BCRP, and OATP1B1/3, and were used to provide dosing guidance for the concomitant use of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with relevant transporter substrates.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine With Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Healthy Subjects.

A fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir is approved for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6. Three phase 1 open-label studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions of the glecaprevir 300-mg and pibrentasvir 120-mg combination with the immunosuppressants tacrolimus (1 mg) or cyclosporine (100 and 400 mg). Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposure was unaffected by tacrolimus, whereas the tacrolimus area under the curve (AUC) value was 45% higher with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Cyclosporine 100 mg had a limited effect on glecaprevir or pibrentasvir exposure (≤37% AUC increase), but cyclosporine 400 mg increased exposure of both glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (410% and 93% AUC increase, respectively). Cyclosporine concentration was unaffected by glecaprevir and pibrentasvir at either cyclosporine dose (≤14% AUC change). Adverse events were all grade 1 (mild), with the most common nausea and flushing attributed to cyclosporine. Findings from these studies supported evaluation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in HCV-infected kidney and liver transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus without additional dose adjustment or receiving cyclosporine up to 100 mg per day.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in HCV-negative subjects with hepatic impairment.

PURPOSE: This study characterized the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, two direct-acting antivirals used for treatment of chronic HCV infection. METHODS: HCV-negative subjects with normal hepatic function, or with mild (Child-Pugh [CP]-A), moderate (CP-B), or severe (CP-C) hepatic impairment received single doses of pibrentasvir 120 mg alone or with glecaprevir 200 mg or 300 mg (n = 6/functional group/dose). Plasma pharmacokinetics and protein binding were evaluated. Doses were separated by ≥ 14 days of washout. RESULTS: For the approved combination of glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 33% (CP-A), to 2.0-fold (CP-B), and to 11-fold (CP-C) relative to normal subjects; pibrentasvir AUC was ≤ 26% different (CP-A or CP-B) and increased to 2.1-fold (CP-C). For glecaprevir 200 mg with pibrentasvir 120 mg, glecaprevir AUC was increased by 80% (CP-A) or to 2.8-fold (CP-B), while pibrentasvir AUC was unaffected in the same subjects (≤ 12% difference). Pibrentasvir 120 mg alone AUC increased 51% (CP-A), 31% (CP-B), and to 5.2-fold (CP-C). The unbound fraction of glecaprevir was higher in CP-C subjects than normal subjects and pibrentasvir protein binding was similar across groups. The most common adverse event was headache; no events were serious. CONCLUSION: This study supported evaluation of the glecaprevir 300 mg with pibrentasvir 120-mg combination in HCV-infected subjects with CP-A hepatic impairment without dose adjustment. Elevated glecaprevir and/or pibrentasvir exposures are expected in HCV-infected patients with CP-B or CP-C hepatic impairment.

Resistance Analysis of a 3-Day Monotherapy Study with Glecaprevir or Pibrentasvir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection.

Glecaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (an NS5A inhibitor) are potent and pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals. This report describes the baseline polymorphisms and treatment-emergent substitutions in NS3 or NS5A detected in samples from HCV genotype 1-infected patients receiving 3-day monotherapy of glecaprevir or pibrentasvir, respectively. None of the NS3 polymorphisms detected in the 47 baseline samples collected prior to glecaprevir monotherapy conferred reduced susceptibility to glecaprevir. The NS3 A156T substitution, which conferred resistance to glecaprevir but had low replication efficiency, emerged in one genotype 1a-infected patient among the 35 patients with available post-baseline sequence data. Baseline NS5A polymorphisms were detected in 12 of 40 patients prior to pibrentasvir monotherapy; most polymorphisms were single-position NS5A amino acid substitutions that did not confer resistance to pibrentasvir. Among the 19 patients with available post-baseline NS5A sequence data, 3 had treatment-emergent NS5A substitutions during pibrentasvir monotherapy. All treatment-emergent NS5A substitutions were linked multiple-position, almost exclusively double-position, substitutions that conferred resistance to pibrentasvir. Replicons engineered with these double-position substitutions had low replication efficiency. In conclusion, resistance-conferring substitutions emerged in a small number of genotype 1-infected patients during glecaprevir or pibrentasvir monotherapy; unlike other NS5A inhibitors, pibrentasvir did not select single-position NS5A substitutions during monotherapy.

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in HCV Genotype 1 or 3 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are direct-acting antiviral agents with pangenotypic activity and a high barrier to resistance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8-week and 12-week courses of treatment with 300 mg of glecaprevir plus 120 mg of pibrentasvir in patients without cirrhosis who had hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 3 infection. METHODS: We conducted two phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter trials. Patients with genotype 1 infection were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for either 8 or 12 weeks. Patients with genotype 3 infection were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 12 weeks of treatment with either glecaprevir-pibrentasvir or sofosbuvir-daclatasvir. Additional patients with genotype 3 infection were subsequently enrolled and nonrandomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir. The primary end point was the rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 1208 patients were treated. The rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks among genotype 1-infected patients was 99.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98 to 100) in the 8-week group and 99.7% (95% CI, 99 to 100) in the 12-week group. Genotype 3-infected patients who were treated for 12 weeks had a rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks of 95% (95% CI, 93 to 98; 222 of 233 patients) with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and 97% (95% CI, 93 to 99.9; 111 of 115) with sofosbuvir-daclatasvir; 8 weeks of treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir yielded a rate of 95% (95% CI, 91 to 98; 149 of 157 patients). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in no more than 1% of patients in any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily treatment with glecaprevir-pibrentasvir for either 8 weeks or 12 weeks achieved high rates of sustained virologic response among patients with HCV genotype 1 or 3 infection who did not have cirrhosis. (Funded by AbbVie; ENDURANCE-1 and ENDURANCE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02604017 and NCT02640157 .).

Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection Without Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has high genotypic diversity and global distribution. Agents that are effective against all major HCV genotypes, with shorter treatment duration, are needed to reduce disease burden. Glecaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (an NS5A inhibitor) have a high barrier to resistance and synergistic antiviral activity. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of 8 and 12 weeks' treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with HCV genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection without cirrhosis in 3 separate phase 3 trials. METHODS: We performed 2 open label, single-arm studies (SURVEYOR-II, Part 4 and ENDURANCE-4) and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ENDURANCE-2). In the ENDURANCE-2 study, adult patients with untreated or previously treated HCV genotype 2 infection without cirrhosis were randomly assigned (2:1) to groups given once-daily oral glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 202; 300 mg/120 mg) or placebo (n = 100) for 12 weeks. In the SURVEYOR-II, Part 4 and ENDURANCE-4 studies, adult patients with untreated or previously treated patients with HCV genotype 2, genotype 4, genotype 5, or genotype 6 infection, without cirrhosis, were given once-daily oral glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 121 in ENDURANCE-4 and n = 145 in SURVEYOR-II) for 12 or 8 weeks, respectively. In all studies the primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Among patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks, rates of SVR12 were 98% (95% CI, 94.1-99.3) in those infected with HCV genotype 2 and 93% (95% CI, 83.6-97.3) in those infected with HCV genotypes 4, 5, or 6. Among patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks, rates of SVR12 were 99.5% (95% CI, 98.5-100) in those infected with HCV genotype 2 and 99% (95% CI, 97.6-100) in those infected with HCV genotype 4, 5, or 6. No virologic failures occurred in patients with HCV genotype 4, 5, or 6 infections. The frequency and severity of adverse events in patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were similar to those of patients who received placebo. CONCLUSION: In 3 Phase 3 studies, 8 weeks' treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasivr produced an SVR12 in at least 93% of patients with chronic HCV genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection without cirrhosis, with virologic failure in less than 1%. The drug combination had a safety profile comparable to 12 week's treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT02640482 (ENDURANCE-2), NCT02636595 (ENDURANCE-4), and NCT02243293 (SURVEYOR-II).

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 patients with cirrhosis and/or prior treatment experience: A partially randomized phase 3 clinical trial.

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ribavirin-free coformulated glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection with prior treatment experience and/or compensated cirrhosis, a patient population with limited treatment options. SURVEYOR-II, Part 3 was a partially randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study. Treatment-experienced (prior interferon or pegylated interferon ± ribavirin or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin ± pegylated interferon therapy) patients without cirrhosis were randomized 1:1 to receive 12 or 16 weeks of G/P (300 mg/120 mg) once daily. Treatment-naive or treatment-experienced patients with compensated cirrhosis were treated with G/P for 12 or 16 weeks, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12). Safety was evaluated throughout the study. There were 131 patients enrolled and treated. Among treatment-experienced patients without cirrhosis, SVR12 was achieved by 91% (20/22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72-97) and 95% (21/22; 95% CI, 78-99) of patients treated with G/P for 12 or 16 weeks, respectively. Among those with cirrhosis, SVR12 was achieved by 98% (39/40; 95% CI, 87-99) of treatment-naive patients treated for 12 weeks and 96% (45/47; 95% CI, 86-99) of patients with prior treatment experience treated for 16 weeks. No adverse events led to discontinuation of study drug, and no serious adverse events were related to study drug. Conclusion: Patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection with prior treatment experience and/or compensated cirrhosis achieved high SVR12 rates following 12 or 16 weeks of treatment with G/P. The regimen was well tolerated. (Hepatology 2018;67:514-523).

Effects of Renal Impairment and Hemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir Combination in Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Subjects.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an independent risk factor for developing chronic renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. Limited treatment options are available for HCV genotype 2, 3, 5, and 6 infections in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 ml/min. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are active against all six major HCV genotypes, are primarily excreted in the bile, and have minimal renal elimination. Therefore, combined treatment with these direct-acting antivirals may be useful for patients with HCV infection and chronic kidney disease. A phase 1, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir. In substudy 1, 38 subjects with stage 2 to 5 chronic kidney disease who were not on dialysis or who had normal renal function received single doses of the combination of 300 mg glecaprevir and 120 mg pibrentasvir. In substudy 2, 8 subjects requiring hemodialysis received single doses of the combination of 300 mg glecaprevir and 120 mg pibrentasvir under dialysis and nondialysis conditions. Regression analyses demonstrated increased glecaprevir and pibrentasvir plasma exposures, as determined by the area under the curve, with decreasing renal function, up to 56% and 46%, respectively, in subjects with an eGFR of <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 In dialysis-dependent subjects, glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures were similar (≤18% difference) when study drugs were administered before hemodialysis or on a nondialysis day. Adverse events were mostly mild, with the most common being self-limited fatigue (3 subjects). The study findings support the clinical evaluation of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir without dose adjustment in HCV-infected subjects with renal impairment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02442258.).

Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 and past direct-acting antiviral treatment failure.

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who have virological failure (VF) after treatment containing a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor have limited retreatment options. MAGELLAN-1 Part 2 was a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ribavirin (RBV)-free glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P; 300 mg/120 mg) in patients with chronic HCV and past VF on at least one NS3/4A protease and/or NS5A inhibitor-containing therapy. Patients with compensated liver disease, with or without cirrhosis, and HCV genotype (GT) 1, 4, 5, or 6 were randomized 1:1 to receive 12 or 16 weeks of G/P. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12). Among 91 patients treated, 87 had GT1 and 4 had GT4 infection. SVR12 was achieved by 89% (39 of 44) and 91% (43 of 47) of patients who received 12 and 16 weeks of G/P, respectively. Virological relapse occurred in 9% (4 of 44) of patients treated with 12 weeks of G/P; there were no relapses with 16 weeks of treatment. Past treatment history with one class of inhibitor (protease or NS5A) had no impact on SVR12, whereas past treatment with both classes of inhibitors was associated with lower SVR12 rate. The most common adverse event (AE) was headache (≥10% of patients), and there were no serious AEs assessed as related to study drugs or AEs leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Sixteen weeks of G/P treatment achieved a high SVR12 rate in patients with HCV GT1 infection and past failure to regimens containing either NS5A inhibitors or NS3 protease inhibitors. (Hepatology 2018;67:1253-1260).

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Healthy White, Chinese, and Japanese Adult Subjects.

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are direct-acting antiviral agents being developed as combination therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The aim of the present studies was to assess the effect of race and ethnicity (white, Han Chinese, Japanese) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of multiple oral doses of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir given alone and in combination. Two multiple-dose, single-center, phase 1 studies were conducted in healthy adult male and female subjects (n = 170) of respective Asian and white race/ethnicity. Glecaprevir (100, 200, 300, or 700 mg once daily) and pibrentasvir (80, 120, or 160 mg once daily) were administered alone for 7 days followed by the combination of both direct-acting antiviral agents for another 7 days. Intensive blood sampling was performed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analyses. ANOVA was employed to evaluate for differences of steady-state glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures between Asian (Japanese or Han Chinese) and white subjects. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures in Han Chinese and Japanese were similar to those in whites across dose levels. The nonlinear dose-exposure relationships for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were similar across Japanese, Han Chinese, and white subjects, and the safety profiles of the agents were comparable across these groups. The results of these studies demonstrate that race/ethnicity has no clinically meaningful impact on direct-acting antiviral agent exposures, safety, or tolerability of the glecaprevir and pibrentasvir combination. This is supported in part by the large global registration program of the pangenotypic, coformulated fixed-dose glecaprevir/pibrentasvir regimen and allows for inclusion of diverse ethnic populations.