Regulatory Framework for Drug Development in Rare Diseases.

Drug development is a highly regulated industry. Therapeutic options for rare diseases must meet the same high standards for the demonstration of safety and efficacy as do those for more common diseases. The approval of the Orphan Drug Act in 1983 has resulted in many more resources for preclinical research, the standardization of patient registries, and the use of real-world data, among other measures, that, along with the advances in drug development, has resulted in the approval of therapies for some of the most unusual diseases. Increased attention to the diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases has also accelerated the development of gene therapies that may offer significant amelioration and even cures for such diseases in the near future. Rare diseases disproportionately affect children, with severe and debilitating effects. Few effective treatments are available for most rare diseases. To avoid the unnecessary waste of data collected in studies of these patients, and to promote efficient drug development, there is a growing collaboration among patient communities, investigators, clinicians, sponsors, and regulatory authorities. All interested parties are working together to identify the most appropriate research questions and move quickly to make available safe and effective treatments. This article is a survey of the most commonly used regulatory remedies that have been put in place to serve as a framework for drug development in rare diseases.

First open-label, single-arm, prospective study of real-world use of FIX replacement therapy in a predominantly pediatric hemophilia B population in China.

BACKGROUND: Nonacog alfa (recombinant factor IX [FIX]) is approved in China for the control and prevention of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia B. This was the first study to assess prophylaxis and on-demand therapy with recombinant FIX replacement in a real-world setting in China. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa in Chinese patients with hemophilia B. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02336178), patients received on-demand or prophylactic treatment with intravenous nonacog alfa for approximately 6 months or 50 exposure days, whichever occurred first. The primary safety outcome was medically important events (i.e., development of FIX inhibitors, allergic reactions, and thrombotic events). Key secondary efficacy outcomes included the annualized bleeding rate for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis, response to on-demand treatment, the number of infusions per bleeding event, and the number of breakthrough bleeding events within 48 hours of prophylaxis. RESULTS: Seventy male patients (mean [standard deviation] age 7.8 [7.2] years) were enrolled (on-demand, n = 37; prophylaxis, n = 57 [24 patients were included in both groups]). Thirty-eight (54%) patients had up to 50 FIX exposure days before the study. The only medically important event was a transient low-titer FIX inhibitor (incidence 1.4%, 95% confidence interval, 0-7.7). The mean annualized bleeding rate was 26.3 for on-demand treatment and 6.5 for prophylaxis. A mean (standard deviation) of 1.5 (1.7) nonacog alfa infusions were given per bleeding episode; 78.8% of episodes resolved with 1 infusion. Response was "excellent" or "good" for 88% of the on-demand infusions. Twenty-three bleeding events (n = 11 patients) occurred within 48 hours of 2032 prophylaxis doses (1.13%). CONCLUSION: In the real-world setting, nonacog alfa is safe and effective for on-demand treatment and for prophylaxis for patients with hemophilia B in China.

Safety and Efficacy of Moroctocog Alfa (AF-CC) in Chinese Patients with Hemophilia A: Results of Two Open-Label Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) increases plasma levels of factor VIII (FVIII) activity and, in China, is indicated for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recovery data of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in patients with hemophilia participating in two open-label studies, both conducted in China. METHODS: The authorization study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00868530) enrolled patients aged ≥6 years, previously treated with ≥1 exposure day of FVIII replacement therapy. The real-world study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02492984) enrolled patients of any age who were previously untreated or requiring surgical prophylaxis. In both studies, on-demand treatment was administered over 6 months. Key assessments included response to treatment, FVIII inhibitor development, and recovery. RESULTS: In the authorization study (N = 53; mean age, 23.2 years; severe hemophilia, 23%), response was excellent/good for 90% of infusions at 24 hours. Seven patients developed inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.77 (0.50) and 1.67 (0.45) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. In the real-world study (N = 85; mean age, 9.5 years; severe hemophilia, 58%), response was rated as excellent or good for most (87%) on-demand infusions and for all surgical prophylaxis patients (n = 14). Seven patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Mean (SD) FVIII recovery at the initial and final visits was 1.71 (0.50) and 1.68 (0.31) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg), respectively. No new safety signals were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: On-demand treatment and surgical prophylaxis with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) is safe and effective for both previously treated and previously untreated Chinese patients with hemophilia A.

Effect of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Rivipansel.

Two studies evaluated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of rivipansel (NCT02813798, NCT02871570). A single intravenous 840-mg rivipansel dose was administered to subjects with renal impairment or normal renal function in study 1005 and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function in study 1006. Plasma (both studies) and urine (study 1005) samples were collected for 96 hours postdose. All subjects in studies 1005 (n = 28) and 1006 (n = 16) completed all study procedures. Rivipansel exposure (AUCinf ) was 47%, 124%, and 437% higher and total clearance 30%, 57%, and 82% lower in the mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively, than in the normal renal function group. Overall rivipansel exposure was 20% lower and total clearance 31% higher in the moderate hepatic impairment group than in the normal hepatic function group. Ten treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in studies 1005 and 1006; no event was considered treatment related. As expected, clearance of rivipansel decreased with increasing renal impairment. The difference observed between rivipansel pharmacokinetics in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function was not considered clinically significant. Single doses of rivipansel were well tolerated in subjects with either renal or hepatic impairment.

Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline to Treat Multidrug-resistant Infections in Pediatrics: An Evidence Synthesis.

BACKGROUND: The need for antimicrobial therapies effective against multidrug resistant organisms for children remains unmet. Tigecycline shows antibacterial activity across a broad spectrum of bacteria and is approved for treating complicated skin and skin-structure infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections and, in the United States, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia for adult patients. No blinded, randomized phase 3 tigecycline clinical trials on neonates or children have been completed or planned. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of all the existing data sources, both on-label and off-label, for tigecycline use in children. METHODS: Data on tigecycline use in children were identified from published and unpublished sources including clinical trials, expanded access and compassionate use programs, databases of healthcare records and patient safety monitoring. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic simulations predicted that tigecycline 1.2 mg/kg (maximum dose 50 mg) every 12 hours (q12h) in children 8-11 years and 50 mg q12h in children 12 to <18 years would achieve exposure similar to adults receiving 50 mg q12h. Available phase 2 pediatric clinical trial data and data from other sources demonstrated similar clinical efficacy between adult and pediatric patients treated with tigecycline. These data showed no new or unexpected safety concerns with tigecycline in children. CONCLUSIONS: Information presented here may help guide the appropriate use of tigecycline in children with multidrug resistant infections. Continued pharmacovigilance from real-world observational studies may also further refine appropriate use of tigecycline.

The Path to Perfect Pediatric Posology - Drug Development in Pediatrics.

Reluctance to enroll pediatric subjects in clinical trials has left gaps in information about dosing, safety, and efficacy of medications. Pharmacotherapeutic information for pediatric patients may be available for only a small range of ages and may be deficient, as children respond differently as they grow and mature from prematurity to adolescence. Current regulations, however, require early planning for the participation of children in drug development, as pediatric plans must be submitted at the end of phase 1 (European Union) or the end of phase 2 (United States). These plans are extensive, outlining planned studies, subjects to be enrolled, dose and dosage form justification, planned observations, and statistical analysis as well as planned modeling, simulation, and extrapolation analyses. The extent to which efficacy information in adults can be extrapolated to children depends on how similar the disease is in adults and each of the 5 pediatric age groups. Extrapolation may not be possible for conditions that do not occur in adults, requiring a complete development plan in adults, or extrapolation may be complete because of similar pathology and response to treatment. Pharmacokinetic and safety information cannot be extrapolated and must be collected in children of all ages, unless a waiver is granted. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, optimal design, population pharmacokinetics, and scavenged samples are all examples of new methodologies being used to study pediatric therapeutics. Clinicaltrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials registry are good sources of results of pediatric trials, although sponsors are also working toward prompt publication of study results in peer-reviewed journals.

The Education of Prescribers for Safe and Effective Use of Medications.

The transformation of medical education, with the disappearance of sequential lectures in pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and therapeutics, has left gaps in skills needed for new physicians and other prescribers to safely incorporate medications into clinical practice. Brinkman et al. conducted a Delphi study of European Union (EU) medical school educators and practitioners to identify core competencies needed to prescribe medications. Their findings offer directions for learned societies, such as ASCPT, to enhance pharmacology education and practice.

Thrombogenicity evaluation in 221 patients with haemophilia B treated with nonacog alfa.

: Risk for thrombotic events with factor IX replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia B remains a concern for patients, those who treat them, and regulatory agencies, based on experience with early use of prothrombin complex concentrates. The current post hoc analysis assessed the incidence of thrombotic events and changes in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and D-dimer in 221 patients with haemophilia B who received nonacog alfa in clinical studies. Thrombotic event and coagulation marker data were collected from 8 interventional studies utilizing on-demand, prophylactic, and preventive regimens in patients with haemophilia B. Mean age was 25 years (min-max, 0-69), with 51 (23%) patients aged less than 12 years and 15 (7%) aged less than 2 years. None tested positive for inhibitors. Mean time on study was 60.9 ±â€Š32 weeks and mean number of exposure days was 69.3 (min-max, 1-496). Sixty-nine (31%) patients regularly received infusions that were approximately 100 IU/kg as part of a routine prophylaxis regimen, and 29 (13%) patients underwent surgical procedures. No clinical thrombotic events were reported, and no patient experienced clinically significant changes in coagulation markers between baseline and end-of-study testing. These collective data support the low thrombotic risk associated with nonacog alfa in paediatric, adult, and surgical patients with haemophilia B receiving different treatment regimens, including doses of approximately 100 IU/kg. Although careful thrombotic clinical evaluation is important, regular coagulation marker monitoring does not appear to be warranted in patients with haemophilia B.

An Open-label, Single-dose, Pharmacokinetic Study of Factor VIII Activity After Administration of Moroctocog Alfa (AF-CC) in Male Chinese Patients With Hemophilia A.

PURPOSE: Hemophilia A represents up to 80% of all hemophilia cases in China. In patients with this condition, bleeding can be prevented and controlled by administering clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Since their initial availability, recombinant FVIII products have undergone several iterations to enhance their safety. Moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) is among the third generation of recombinant FVIII products and received regulatory approval in China in August 2012. The present study characterizes the single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of FVIII activity (FVIII:C) after administration of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in male Chinese patients with hemophilia A. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-dose study enrolled 13 male Chinese patients diagnosed with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) and a history of at least 150 exposure-days to any FVIII-containing product. Eligible patients received a single dose of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) 50 IU/kg IV within 10 minutes. Blood samples were collected within 2 hours before administration and through 72 hours after dosing. FINDINGS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed based on FVIII:C and were analyzed by age groups: ages 6 to <12 years (n = 3) and ≥12 years (n = 10). The mean plasma concentration-time profile for FVIII:C activity was consistently lower in patients aged 6 to <12 years compared with those aged ≥12 years. Geometric AUC0-∞ and Cmax were approximately 57% and 28% lower in the younger patients relative to the older patients, respectively. A total of 4 adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Low-titer, transient FVIII inhibitors were observed in 2 patients and were considered serious adverse events. Neither case resulted in clinical manifestations nor required treatment. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first report of the pharmacokinetic parameters of FVIII:C after moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in an all-Chinese population of males with hemophilia A. The pharmacokinetic profile in older patients was similar to that previously reported with recombinant FVIII products in studies with a predominantly white population; younger patients had reduced exposure to FVIII:C. The single doses of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) were well tolerated; 2 cases of transient, low-titer FVIII inhibitor development were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02461992.

Core Entrustable Professional Activities in Clinical Pharmacology for Entering Residency: Biologics.

Biologicals are a rapidly expanding class of medications used in the treatment of many different conditions. This article reviews the common characteristics of this class and the requirements for safe and effective use in patients. Several vignettes are included to illustrate common challenges.

Lack of Effect of Rivipansel on QTc Interval in Healthy Adult African American Male Subjects.

Rivipansel is a pan-selectin inhibitor in phase 3 development for the treatment of vaso-occlusive crises in patients with sickle cell disease. This single-dose, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment (400 mg moxifloxacin open-label, 4 g rivipansel-blinded, and placebo-blinded) crossover study evaluated the effect of rivipansel on the QT/QTc interval in 48 healthy male African American subjects (age, 21-53 years; weight, 60-115 kg). Time-matched, placebo-adjusted change from baseline QT interval using Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) was determined using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. The highest upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for QTcF change was 3.22 milliseconds 3 hours postdose. Moxifloxacin showed the anticipated QTcF effect, indicating that the study had adequate sensitivity to detect changes in the QTcF interval. The study concluded that no QTcF effect was demonstrated with rivipansel compared with placebo, as the upper bound of the 2-sided 90%CI was less than 10 milliseconds at all times. Exposure-response modeling for rivipansel concentrations and change from baseline in QTcF data corroborated a lack of effect with rivipansel compared with placebo. Single doses of rivipansel 4 g by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes were well tolerated in this study.

Confirmation of longer FIX activity half-life with prolonged sample collection after single doses of nonacog alfa in patients with haemophilia B.

A multicentre, single-dose study enrolled 12 previously treated patients with moderately severe to severe (factor IX [FIX] levels ≤2 IU/dl) haemophilia B to assess FIX pharmacokinetics after nonacog alfa administration and to evaluate the impact of length of sampling time on half-life (t½). After refraining from FIX replacement for four days, patients received 50 IU/kg as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 10 minutes. Blood samples were collected predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 24, 50, 72, and 96 h post dose. Tolerability and safety were assessed by monitoring adverse events and were subsequently summary tabulated. FIX activity was measured by a one-stage clotting assay with a lower limit of quantification of 0.010 IU/ml, and inhibitors to FIX were measured using the Bethesda assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and were descriptively summarised. Half-life estimates were calculated first using all available data, then excluding 96-h observations (truncated at 72 h) and, finally, excluding both 72- and 96-h observations (truncated at 50 h). No patient was positive for FIX inhibitors. No treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Prolonging the duration of the sample collection to 96 h resulted in a terminal t½ estimate of 39.6 ±7.4 h in the eight patients aged 18 years and older, which was longer than the estimates obtained using shorter periods of observation: 29.6 ± 5.5 h (truncated at 72 h) and 27.2 ± 7.0 h (truncated at 50 h). To accurately assess an adult patient's t½, sampling should be continued for at least 96 h.

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Nonacog Alfa in Previously Treated Patients with Moderately Severe to Severe Hemophilia B.

PURPOSE: Nonacog alfa, a recombinant factor IX (FIX) product, is used for FIX replacement in the treatment and prevention of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia B. This study aimed to provide supplemental pharmacokinetic (PK), efficacy, and safety data for nonacog alfa when administered as part of usual hemophilia care, including on-demand treatment, routine prophylaxis, and surgical prophylaxis. METHODS: Men with previously treated severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (FIX activity ≤2%) were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter study. An initial 72-hour PK assessment was performed wherein patients received a single dose of nonacog alfa (75 IU/kg) as an infusion over 10 minutes. A final 72-hour PK assessment was performed at the patient's last visit, after a minimum washout period of 4 days. Correlations between Cmax after the first dose and body weight and body mass index (BMI) were assessed post hoc using Spearman test after evaluating normality. FINDINGS: In total, 23 patients (age, 12-59 years; weight, 44-173 kg; and BMI, 16.3-45.1) with previous exposure to FIX products (median, 460 days; range, 150-2400 days) were enrolled; 21 were evaluable for efficacy. The median number of exposure days per efficacy-evaluable patient in this study was 48 (range, 31-103). The FIX activity profiles showed multiphasic disposition characteristics, with initial mean (SD) PK profiles as follows: Cmax, 61.4 (12.5) IU/dL; AUC∞, 1055 (227) IU·h/dL; t½, 23.7 (5.6) hours; and recovery, 0.818 (0.167) IU/dL. Mean plasma FIX activity versus time profiles were essentially identical upon initial exposure and after repeated use (n = 17), and bioequivalence was confirmed. No apparent relationship was observed between Cmax and either body weight (P > 0.1732) or BMI (P > 0.1235). IMPLICATIONS: The FIX activity profile after administration of nonacog alfa is predictable and is not altered after repeated exposure during usual hemophilia care. PK parameters are consistent with nonacog alfa use for FIX replacement in on-demand treatment, routine prophylaxis, and surgical prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B.

Prospective surveillance study of haemophilia A patients switching from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII products to moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) in usual care settings.

This prospective, open-label, postauthorisation safety surveillance study assessed clinically significant inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products to reformulated moroctocog alfa (AF-CC). Males aged ≥ 12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C) < 1 IU/dl), > 150 exposure days (EDs) to recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII products, and no detectable inhibitor at screening were enrolled. Primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development. Secondary end points included annualised bleeding rate (ABR), less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE), and FVIII recovery. Patients were assigned to one of two cohorts based on whether they were transitioning to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) from moroctocog alfa (cohort 1; n=146) or from another recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII product (cohort 2; n=62). Mean number of EDs on study was 94 (range, 1-139). Six positive FVIII inhibitor results, as determined by local laboratories, were reported in four patients; none were confirmed by a central laboratory, no inhibitor-related clinical manifestations were reported, and all anti-FVIII antibody assays were negative. Median ABRs were 23.4 and 3.4 in patients categorised at baseline as following on-demand and prophylactic regimens, respectively; 86.5% of bleeding episodes resolved after one infusion. LETE incidence was 0.06% and 0.19% in the on-demand and prophylaxis settings, respectively. FVIII recovery remained constant throughout the study. No new safety concerns were identified. This study found no increased risk of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development in patients transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other FVIII replacement products to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC).

Comparative bioavailability study of single-dose film-coated and sugar-coated ethionamide tablets in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ethionamide sugar-coated tablets have been reformulated to film-coated tablets to improve dissolution and stability. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to compare the bioavailability of the film-coated (test) and sugar-coated (reference) formulations of ethionamide. METHODS: After providing informed consent and undergoing screening procedures, 40 healthy subjects were assigned to receive a single dose of ethionamide 250-mg film- or sugar-coated tablets, in randomized order, in the fasted state. Serial blood samples were collected before and from 0.5 to 24 hours after dosing. After a 7-day washout, procedures were repeated for the other formulation. The blood samples were processed to provide plasma samples, which were frozen until assay. Plasma ethionamide concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method, with a lower limit of quantitation of 20 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods, with subsequent evaluation for bioequivalence. RESULTS: All 40 subjects (37 men, 3 women; mean age, 28 years; mean weight, 74 kg) completed the study. Seven subjects reported a total of 10 adverse events (5 with each formulation), all of which were mild and considered possibly related to drug treatment. None of the events resulted in discontinuation from the study. Mean (SD) pharmacokinetic properties observed with the film- and sugar-coated tablets, respectively, were as follows: Cmax, 2160 (614) and 1484 (636) ng/mL; Tmax, 1.0 (0.5) and 1.5 (0.9) hours; ke, 0.369 (0.053) and 0.232 (0.114) h(-1); t½, 1.92 (0.27) and 4.06 (2.52) hours; and AUC, 7668 (1688) and 6594 (1764) ng · h/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing AUC values, the formulations were bioequivalent. The maximum concentrations observed with the film-coated product were higher but were more consistent (%CV, 28%) compared with those of the sugar-coated formulation (%CV, 43%).

Long-term evaluation of analytical methods used in sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring.

Results of therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus blood concentrations are assay and laboratory dependent. This study compared performance over time of the IMx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) as part of a proficiency testing scheme. Pooled samples from sirolimus-treated patients and whole-blood samples spiked with known quantities of sirolimus were assayed monthly between 2004 and 2012. When results of pooled patient samples were compared with LC/MS/MS, the MEIA assay showed an overall mean percent bias of -2.3% ± 11.2% that, although initially positive, became increasingly negative from 2007 through 2009. The CMIA, which replaced the MEIA assay, had a mean percent bias of 21.9% ± 12.3%, remaining stable from 2007 through 2012. Similarly, for spiked samples, the MEIA showed an increasingly negative bias over time vs. LC/MS/MS, whereas CMIA maintained a stable positive bias. Based on comparison of immunoassay measurements on individual patient samples, CMIA values were more than 25% higher than MEIA values. These results highlight the importance of continued proficiency testing and regular monitoring of sirolimus assay performance. Clinicians must be aware of the methodology used and adjust target levels accordingly to avoid potential effects on efficacy and toxicity.

Pancreatitis in tigecycline Phase 3 and 4 clinical studies.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence of pancreatitis among subjects enrolled in the tigecycline clinical trial programme, summarize cases and examine concomitant use of other pancreatitis-causing medications. METHODS: Subject data from Phase 3 and 4 comparative tigecycline studies were included in the analysis; investigator-reported adverse events of 'pancreatitis', 'necrotizing pancreatitis' or 'pancreas disorder' were reviewed. Data were summarized and cases were reported. No statistical comparisons were made. The incidence of overall pancreatitis with 95% CIs was calculated. The Wilson score method was used to calculate CIs. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects with investigator-determined pancreatitis were identified from the programme database, which included 3788 subjects treated with tigecycline and 3646 subjects treated with a comparator. There were 9 cases identified among the tigecycline-treated subjects [9 of 3788 (0.24%; 95% CI, 0.11-0.45)] and 10 cases among the comparator-treated subjects [10 of 3646 (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.13-0.50)]. The demographic characteristics of the subjects with pancreatitis were similar between treatment groups. The median duration of tigecycline therapy was 8.0 days compared with 11.0 days of comparator treatment. Concomitant or prior exposure to a Badalov class I medication was evident in the majority of subjects who developed pancreatitis. A numerically higher number of tigecycline-treated subjects were exposed to furosemide prior to the onset of pancreatitis than comparator-treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatitis was uncommon in subjects treated with tigecycline, with an occurrence of <1%. Concomitant medications known to cause pancreatitis should be considered when prescribing tigecycline, but may not identify those at risk of developing pancreatitis.

Reassessment of tigecycline bone concentrations in volunteers undergoing elective orthopedic procedures.

The goal of the this study was to re-evaluate tigecycline bone concentrations in subjects undergoing elective orthopedic surgery, using multiple doses and a more robust bone assay than was used in a previous study. Each subject received three intravenous doses of tigecycline (one 100-mg infusion followed by two 50-mg infusions, each administered over 30 minutes). A single bone sample was collected from each subject at one of the following times: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 12 hours after the third dose. Four blood samples were collected from each subject: before the first dose, before and after the third dose, and within 15 minutes of the collection time of the bone sample. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis serum and bone area under the curve for the given dose interval (AUCτ ) values were 2,402 ng h/mL and 11,465 ng h/g, and maximum concentration (Cmax ) values were 974 ng/mL and 2,262 ng/g, respectively. The bone to serum ratio calculated using the AUCτ values was 4.77, confirming tigecycline penetration into bone.

The effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in healthy volunteers.

Sirolimus, metabolized primarily by intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4, is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. CYP3A4 inducers would be expected to decrease sirolimus exposure. This open-label, nonrandomized study investigated effects of CYP3A4 induction, by rifampin, on sirolimus pharmacokinetics. Healthy volunteers received sirolimus 20 mg on day 1. After washout period, multiple 600-mg rifampin doses were administered daily for 14 days. On day 9, one 20-mg sirolimus dose was administered after an overnight fast (≥10 hours). Whole blood samples for sirolimus collected for 144 hours after each dose were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters, assessed using noncompartmental methods, were compared using analysis of variance. Geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUCinf were 29% (90% CI: 26, 32%) and 18% (90% CI: 16, 21%), respectively, with rifampin co-administration versus sirolimus alone. Corresponding decreases in Cmax and AUC were 71% and 82%, respectively, which would likely cause trough concentrations to fall below the recommended therapeutic range. Mean CL/F increased approximately fivefold with rifampin versus sirolimus alone. Co-administering sirolimus and potent CYP3A inducers is not recommended. If co-administration is necessary, dose adjustment and concentration monitoring should be conducted.