Promoting Organizational Change: A Urology Department-wide Wellness Program to Reduce Burnout.

INTRODUCTION: We developed a comprehensive wellness initiative to address burnout with specific interventions targeted at faculty, residents, nurses, administrators, coordinators, and other departmental personnel. METHODS: A department-wide wellness initiative was implemented in October 2020. General interventions included monthly holiday-themed lunches, weekly pizza lunches, employee recognition events, and initiation of a virtual networking board. Urology residents received financial education workshops, weekly lunches, peer support sessions, and exercise equipment. Faculty were offered personal wellness days to use at their discretion at no penalty to their calculated productivity. Administrative and clinical staff were given weekly lunches and professional development sessions. Pre- and post-intervention surveys included a validated single-item burnout instrument and the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariable ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 96 department members, 66 (70%) and 53 (55%) participants completed the pre- and post-intervention surveys, respectively. Burnout scores were significantly improved after the wellness initiative (mean 2.06 vs 2.42, mean difference -0.36, P = .012). An improvement was also observed in the sense of community (mean 4.04 vs 3.36, mean difference 0.68, P < .001). Adjusting for role group and gender, completion of the curriculum was associated with decreased burnout (OR 0.44, P = .025), increased professional fulfillment (OR 2.05, P = .038), and increased sense of community (OR 3.97, P < .001). The highest-rated components were monthly gatherings (64%), sponsored lunches (58%), and employee of the month (53%). CONCLUSIONS: A department-wide wellness initiative with group-specific interventions can help reduce burnout and may improve professional fulfillment and workplace community.

Hospital Ownership, Geographic Region, Patient Age, Comorbidities, and Insurance Status Appear to Influence Patient Selection Robot-Assisted Ureteral Reimplantation for Benign Disease: A Population-Based Analysis.

Background: Robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (RAUR) is a relatively new minimally invasive procedure. As such, research is lacking, and the largest adult cohort studies include fewer than 30 patients. Our aim was to be the first population-based study to report on national utilization trends, factors associated with patient selection, inpatient outcomes, and the relative cost of RAUR for adults with benign ureteral disease (BUD). Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2010-2015) was queried to identify all elective, nontransplant-related, open and robot-assisted reimplants for adult BUD. Survey-weighted logistic regression using Akaike Information Criterion identified patient-/hospital-level factors associated with robotic procedure. Survey-weighted regression models examined the association of robotic procedure with outcomes and charges. Results: A weighted total of 9088 cases were included: 1688 (18.6%) robot assisted and 7400 (81.4%) open. There were significantly increased odds of RAUR across consecutive years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.0, p < 0.001) and among patients operated on at private for-profit hospitals (OR: 2.1; p = 0.01), but significantly decreased odds among older patients (OR = 0.98, p < 0.001), those with Medicaid (OR = 0.5, p = 0.02), those with 2+ comorbidities (OR = 0.6, p = 0.009), and those operated on in western (OR = 0.5; p = 0.005) states. RAUR was significantly associated with a reduced length-of-stay (incidence rate ratio: 0.60; p < 0.001), decreased odds of blood transfusion (OR = 0.40; p < 0.001), and a lower mean ratio of total hospital charges (ratio: 0.71; p = 0.006). Conclusions: This is the first population-based study to report on the utilization and clinical benefits of RAUR for adult BUD. Open reimplantation remains the most common surgical technique utilized, despite the potential benefits of RAUR. Future research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind patient-/hospital-level factors and surgical selection. Work to investigate potential barriers in access to robotic procedure can help us provide equitable care across patient populations.

Biological sex impacts perioperative complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in complication rates between males and females undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. We hypothesized that (1) females were more likely to undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture, and (2) males were more likely to sustain a perioperative complication. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture between 2011 and 2018. Patients were stratified based on biological sex. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day perioperative complication rates were collected. Univariate analyses and multiple variable logistic regression modeling were performed. RESULTS: About 905 patients were included in the analysis-175 (19.3%) were male and 730 (80.7%) were female. Males were more likely to sustain perioperative complications (26.3% vs. 14.1%; P < .001)-pneumonia (2.9% vs. 0.5%; P = .016), unplanned intubation (2.3% vs. 0.4%; P = .029), and unplanned reoperation (9.1% vs. 1.1%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, males were at a 2.4-fold increase risk of developing any complication (OR = 2.38 [95% CI 1.55-3.65]; P < .001) and a 10-fold increase risk of returning to the operating room for an unplanned reoperation (OR = 10.59 [95% CI 4.23-27.49]; P < .001) compared with females. CONCLUSION: Females were more likely to undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture, but males were at increased risk of sustaining short-term complications. This study provides useful information for clinicians to consider when counseling their patients during the perioperative period.