Open, randomized, phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine and docetaxel as first- and second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy has been widely accepted as standard for palliation in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine and docetaxel are active as single agents. Our previous experience indicates that single-agent therapy, if given sequentially, could be an alternative to doublet combination chemotherapy and that sequence and schedule matter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive first-line 3-weekly gemcitabine or docetaxel. At progression, patients received second-line therapy with the other agent. Treatment was considered feasible if 30% of the evaluable patients had > or = 2 cycles of first-line and 2 cycles of second-line therapy and patient survival was > or = 7 months from the start of treatment. For efficacy, time to progression, overall survival, response, and quality of life were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty patients received gemcitabine followed by docetaxel or docetaxel followed by gemcitabine. Treatment was feasible for 60 patients (38%) with gemcitabine followed by docetaxel and for 80 patients (49%) with docetaxel followed by gemcitabine; treatment favored docetaxel followed by gemcitabine (P = 0.03539). Median survival for gemcitabine followed by docetaxel and docetaxel followed by gemcitabine was 6.3 months and 8.6 months, and 1-year survival rate was 28% and 31%, respectively. Objective response rates were < or = 10% for both treatment strategies. Quality of life was significantly better in gemcitabine followed by docetaxel (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Single-agent gemcitabine and docetaxel are feasible as defined for both sequences but treatment favors docetaxel followed by gemcitabine. Thus, it is reasonable to state that single-agent therapy given sequentially might be a candidate for palliation and therefore should be investigated in comparison with combination therapy.

Randomized multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine versus docetaxel as first-line therapy with second-line crossover in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II study was performed to determine whether single-agent gemcitabine or docetaxel with the introduction of the opposite agent in case of disease progression (ie, in the second-line setting) is feasible and effective in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The doses were 1,000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 35 mg/m2 for docetaxel, each given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, the docetaxel/gemcitabine arm (ie, docetaxel followed by gemcitabine) was closed after enrollment of 49 patients because of poor predefined feasibility. A total of 98 patients were recruited to the gemcitabine/docetaxel arm (ie, gemcitabine followed by docetaxel). RESULTS: Quality of life remained near baseline levels during the administration of 6 cycles of gemcitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy, whereas it deteriorated after 2 cycles of docetaxel/gemcitabine. Toxicity was comparable between arms. Median times to progression were 4.3 months and 2.2 months with gemcitabine/docetaxel and docetaxel/gemcitabine, respectively, and median overall survival times were 9 months (gemcitabine/docetaxel) and 5 months (docetaxel/gemcitabine; P=0.029, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line weekly docetaxel is feasible, with promising survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Long-term survival in SCLC after treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide--a phase II study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with limited disease (LD) or extensive disease without distant metastases (ED I) were treated in this multi-centered phase II trial between April 1996 and June 1997. Paclitaxel administration (175 mg/m(2) by a 1 h intravenous infusion) was immediately followed by a 30 min infusion of carboplatin at an area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1 and etoposide 50 mg orally twice daily (bid) was given on days 2-8. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had an objective response continued treatment for a maximum of 6 courses. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were assessable for response. Overall response rate (RR) was 82.1% with 17.8% complete remissions and 64.3% partial remissions. Median survival for LD patients was 20.5 months with a 1 year survival rate of 71.4% and a 3 year survival rate of 21.4%. Median survival of ED I patients was 11 months with a 1 year survival rate of 31.3% and a 3 year survival rate of 3.1%. Overall median survival was 18.1 months with a 1 year survival rate of 56.8% and a 3 year survival rate of 14.8%. Median progression-free intervals were 12.3 months for patients with LD stage of the disease and 8 months with ED I stage. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic. Grade 3/4 leucopenia occurred in 16.0% of courses and febrile episodes were detected in 0.3% of courses. Non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Grade 3 GI-tract toxicities or peripheral neuropathy appeared in less than 1% of the courses. Toxicities were detected according to WHO toxicity criteria. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (175 mg/m(2)) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Efficacy data, RR, progression-free interval and survival in both, extensive and limited stage patients compare favorably with other reported data. This new regimen will be further evaluated in comparison to standard regimens in a phase III trial.