Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Kardiol Pol ; 73(8): 627-36, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26314883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been considered a relative contraindication for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Due to more oval shape of the BAV annulus compared to tricuspid aortic valve, the procedure has been discouraged because of an increased risk of stent assembly displacement, uneven expansion, post-procedure paravalvular leakage, stent valve distortion, or other malfunction after implantation. For the same reasons patients with BAV have been excluded from the majority of clinical TAVI trials. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAVI in patients with BAV stenosis. METHODS: We analysed a group of 104 patients admitted to our institution for TAVI between January 2009 and May 2012. During pre-procedure evaluation, transthoracic and transoesophageal (TEE) echocardiography as well as angio-computed tomography (CT) scan were performed to assess aortic valve anatomy and morphology. Appropriate measurements and detailed analyses of imaging data have been accomplished to select optimal access site, prosthesis size as well as to plan the procedure. BAVs were recorded in seven patients (6.7%; mean age 77.7 years). These patients presented with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with a mean aortic valve area of 0.55 cm² (0.46-0.7 cm²) as measured in TEE. All of the patients had been disqualified from surgical valve replacement due to high surgical risk with a mean logistic Euroscore of 19.9%. All of them successfully underwent TAVI using CoreValve (n = 5) or Sapien (n = 2) valves. Follow-up was completed at 30 days, and six and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: During follow-up one patient developed an elliptic distortion of the aortic prosthesis in CT, although it did not result in significant malfunctioning of the implant. One patient died of infective endocarditis 30 days after the procedure. Survivors at 30-day follow-up had mild to moderate aortic insufficiency, and it did not deteriorate after six months. At one year follow-up six out of seven patients remained alive. They achieved significant functional improvement by New York Heart Association class compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI may constitute an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients with BAV, resulting in a low periprocedural mortality rate, and good 30-day, six-month, and one-year outcomes.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Cardiol ; 65(4): 285-92, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25578786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a serious complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There are scant data on the application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for prediction of postoperative AF. METHODS: A total of 102 patients (77 male, mean age: 64±10 years) with pre-procedural CCTA undergoing isolated CABG were enrolled. Clinical risk factors were collected. Qualitative and quantitative CCTA analysis of the atria, pulmonary veins (PV), and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) along the left atrium (LA) was performed to determine the predictors for postoperative AF. The primary endpoint was defined as any in-hospital AF requiring treatment. RESULTS: Postoperative AF occurred in 24% of patients. Patients with AF had higher body mass index (29.7±4.8kg/m(2) vs 27.3±3.9kg/m(2), p=0.013), larger right atrial area (25.4±5.3cm(2) vs 22.3±6.4cm(2), p=0.035), LA systolic volume (114.7±32.8ml vs 96.8±30.4ml, p=0.015), LA EAT volume (5.6±3ml vs 4±2.5ml, p=0.009), and right superior PV ostium area (3.8±1.3cm(2) vs 3±1cm(2), p=0.021) compared to non-AF patients. By multivariable analysis, only LA EAT volume [odds ratio (OR): 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.44, p=0.036] and right superior PV ostium area (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.06-2.50, p=0.026) were independent predictors of AF. The optimal cut-offs for LA EAT volume and right superior PV ostium were >3.4ml and >4.1cm(2), respectively (max. sensitivity: 83%, max. specificity: 86%). CONCLUSIONS: Increased LA EAT and right superior PV ostial size are independently associated with AF after CABG. CCTA might be used as a noninvasive prediction tool for AF in patients undergoing CABG.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Body Mass Index , Female , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Heart Atria/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pericardium/diagnostic imaging , Pericardium/physiopathology , Postoperative Period , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...