Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Bilateral Sacral Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: We present a minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation technique for unstable bilateral sacral fractures and describe a technical report. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unstable sacral fractures are severe injuries with high mortality and morbidity due to pain and malunion. Galveston technique is useful for rigid fixation of an unstable sacral fracture. However, wound-related complications with this technique have been relatively common because of extensive contusion of the skin or poor blood supply after embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 34 patients with unstable pelvic fractures between 2005 and 2012. We performed conventional open surgery between 2005 and 2009. Minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation was performed between 2009 and 2012. Minimally invasive technique needs 4 small, lateral incisions for percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw insertion. We pushed a pure titanium rod into the paravertebral muscle. RESULTS: The average surgical time was 345 minutes in the conventional fixation and 208 minutes with the minimally invasive fixation. The average intraoperative bleeding was 520 mL in the conventional fixation and 290 mL in minimally invasive fixation. When comparing deep wound infection, 3 of 8 (38%) patients who received conventional fixation had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, whereas nobody who received the minimally invasive fixation acquired infection. Bony union was achieved in 15 of the 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation required a shorter surgical time, incurred less bleeding, and had a lower infection rate than fixation with the conventional Galveston technique.

Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications.

PURPOSE: Cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression is a fairly common problem in Japan. Because elderly Japanese population tend to have cervical spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of these patients. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of these patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients had been enrolled in this study. Patients who had paralysis of ASIA impairment scale (AIS) A, B or C were included. With each new patient, we alternated whether he/she received surgical treatment (group S) or conservative treatment (group C). Eleven patients were assigned to each group. We compared the two groups' courses of treatment and complications by evaluating their neurological symptoms using the AIS and ASIA motor score (MS) documenting them at the time of injury and 3 months later. RESULTS: The majority of clinical paralysis was found at the C3/4 level for both the groups. According to complications, there were seven urinary tract infections and four pneumonias in group S and one urinary tract infection and three pneumonias in group C. Both groups had an average MS of 42 at the time of injury. Three months later, the average MSs were 59 points in group S and 65 points in group C. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we found no significant difference in paralysis improvement between surgical and conservative treatment, although we observed a higher frequency of complications with surgery.

Recovery of motor function in patients with subaxial cervical spine injury relevant to the fracture pattern.

In this study, we studied the relationship between fracture patterns and motor function recovery in 70 consecutive patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Fractures were categorized into 6 fracture types and subdivided into stages according to the Allen-Ferguson classification system:compressive flexion (CF), distractive flexion (DF), compressive extension (CE), distractive extension (DE), vertical compression (VC) and lateral flexion (LF). Paralysis was evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale at the time of injury and 3 months afterwards. The residual rate of complete motor palsy (ASIA grade A or B) at the final examination was higher in those patients with DE fractures than those with CF, DF or CE. The final outcomes were as follows. Of the 14 patients who were classified with CF fractures, residual palsy was frequently seen in patients who had stage 5 injury. Of the 27 patients with DF fractures, residual palsy occurred in about half of the patients who had stage 4 or 5 injury. Of the 18 patients with CE fractures, residual palsy occurred in half of the patients with stage 3 injury or higher. Finally, of the 7 patients with DE fractures, the rate of residual palsy was high even for the stage 1 and 2 cases;indeed, all DE patients who had complete motor palsy at the first examination had residual palsy at the final examination. Accordingly, we conclude that motor recovery may be related to fracture pattern.

Surgical treatment of metastatic vertebral tumors.

Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of our current surgical treatments and the use of spinal instrumentation. In this retrospective study covering the years between 1990 and 2006, 100 patients with spinal metastases which were secondary to various cancers underwent posterior and/or anterior decompression with spinal stabilization for the purposes of reduction of pain, and/or to help correct or improve neurological deficits. The group was made up of 60 men and 40 women whose ages ranged from 16 to 83 years (average of 60 years), and the average follow-up period was 14 months. The effect of treatment upon pain relief and neural deficits was assessed, and the cumulative survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The average surgical time was 185 min. This was calculated based on the following times, listed here with the surgery type: 178 min for posterior surgery; 245 min for anterior surgery;465 min for combined surgery;and 475 min for total en bloc spondylectomy. Average blood loss during surgery was 1,630 ml for posterior surgery, 1,760 ml for anterior surgery, 1,930 ml for combined surgery, and 3,640 ml for total en bloc spondylectomy. Preoperative pain and paralysis were improved by 88% and 53%, respectively. In regards to surgical complications, postoperative epidural hematoma was observed in 2 patients, and instrumentation-related infection was observed in 1. Only 2 patients died within 2 months of surgery. In conclusion, posterior and/or anterior decompression with spinal stabilization is a safe and effective treatment for patients with spinal metastases, and can improve their quality of life.