The impact of psoriasis on health care costs and patient work loss.

BACKGROUND: There are few comprehensive estimates of the cost of psoriasis in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the incremental direct medical and indirect work loss costs associated with psoriasis. METHODS: A de-identified claims database from 31 self-insured employers during the period 1998 to 2005 was used. Patients with at least two psoriasis diagnosis claims (N = 12,280) were compared with 3 control subjects (matched on year of birth and sex) without psoriasis. Multivariate two-part regression analysis was used to isolate the incremental cost of psoriasis by controlling for comorbidities and other confounding factors. RESULTS: After multivariate adjustment, the incremental direct and indirect costs of psoriasis were approximately $900 and $600 (P < .001) per patient per year, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The database used in this study does not contain information on patient out-of-pocket costs or loss of productivity costs at work. CONCLUSION: The incremental cost of psoriasis is approximately $1500 per patient per year, with work loss costs accounting for 40% of the cost burden.

The direct and indirect cost burden of atopic dermatitis: an employer-payer perspective.

The goal of this study was to quantify the incremental direct medical and indirect work-loss costs associated with patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD). A de-identified administrative claims database was used comprising 5.1 million covered beneficiaries from 31 Fortune 500 self-insured employers between 1998 and 2005. Patients with at least two AD diagnosis claims (N = 13,749) were compared with three matched controls (based on yr of birth and gender) with no AD diagnosis (N = 41,247). In addition, a multivariate two-part regression analysis was used to isolate the cost increase attributable to AD by controlling for confounding factors such as age, gender, health plan type, comorbidities, organ transplantation, industry of employer, region, and year. Direct medical and indirect work-loss costs for the AD group were higher on average by $88 and $64 per patient per month, respectively (both P< .001). After multivariate adjustment, the total incremental cost per patient per month for the AD group was $83 (direct: $52, P< .001; indirect: $31, P< .001). Employer-payers experience a significant annual cost burden of $991 per patient attributable to AD. Employee disability and increased sick days account for 38% of the cost burden.

Cost-minimization analysis of once-weekly versus thrice-weekly epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-related anemia.

BACKGROUND: For individuals with chemotherapy-related anemia, the clinical effectiveness of epoetin alfa (EPO) dosed once weekly ([QW], 40,000 units per dose) has been demonstrated to be indistinguishable from that observed with thrice-weekly dosing ([TIW], 10,000 units per dose). Whether the advantage of less-frequent administration justifies the higher EPO dosage used in the weekly regimen in terms of overall cost of care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-minimization analysis comparing QW and TIW EPO dosing from a societal perspective. METHODS: Direct and indirect medical cost data were calculated for a 16-week period for 2 large, prospective, multicenter, community-based studies. Costs measured included EPO, transfusions, laboratory tests, office visits, and opportunity cost of patient time. RESULTS: The average total costs in 2002 (first half) dollars were nearly equivalent across the 2 groups (QW: 9,204 dollars; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9,057 dollars-9,350 dollars. TIW: 9,265 dollars; 95% CI, 9,083 dollars-9,447 dollars. P=0.60). QW incurred mean drug acquisition costs that were 23% higher (QW: 6,725 dollars; 95% CI, 6,611 dollars-6,838 dollars. TIW: 5,474 dollars; 95% CI, 5,350 dollars-5,598 dollars. P<0.001). However, QW patients can avoid the resource use and time cost associated with 2 additional office visits incurred each week (QW: 592 dollars [583 dollars-600 dollars]; TIW: 1,709 dollars [1,678 dollars-1,740 dollars]; P<0.001). Transfusion and laboratory test costs were slightly higher in the TIW group (QW: 1,888 dollars [1,837 dollars-1,940 dollars]; TIW: 2,082 dollars [2,020 dollars-2,144 dollars]; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Total anemia treatment costs over a 16-week period with EPO QW were similar to those of TIW dosing. In the absence of cost differences between regimens, the noneconomic advantages of less-frequent dosing intervals should make weekly dosing increasingly attractive to patients, clinicians, and payers.