Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Investig Clin Urol ; 58(2): 109-116, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28261680

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Comparison of subjective reasons for the refusal of antimuscarinic treatment and the state of objective economic, social, psychological and health status markers in the elderly with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand seven hundred thirty-six (1,736) patients participated in the experiment: 1,036 or 59.7% of women, and 700 or 40.3% of men aged over 60 years (average age, 68.1 years) who took antimuscarinic (AM) drugs during the year. The control of objective parameters was carried out by studying patients' medical records, the use of overactive bladder questionnaire short form and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Shor-Form Health Survey, voiding diaries, uroflowmetry, as well as income certificates from the Tax Inspectorate, support documentation for expenses on drugs. RESULTS: Fifty-two point six percent (52.6%) of patients preserved adherence to treatment during the first 6 months, 30.1% - during the follow-up period. The average time of reaching a 30-day break in the AM drugs administration was 174 days. In 36.5% of cases of the refusal of treatment, patients referred to medical reasons for the refusal, in 31.6% of cases disturbance was established in objective health status markers (differences were significant in 30% of the follow-up time). The percentage of refusals of treatment for social and psychological reasons (13.2%) was significantly lower (p≤0.05), than the percentage of individuals with statuses altered objectively (21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant share of elderly patients taking AM drugs when treating overactive bladder is inclined to overestimate the importance of health factors influencing their decisions and to underestimate the importance of social and psychological factors, and an urologist should take it into account for the efficacy evaluation.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Frail Elderly , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Russia , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Ther Adv Urol ; 9(12): 271-279, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examines subjective reasons for the refusal of treatment and the state of objective status markers of various factors influencing the resistance of patients when treating overactive bladder by antimuscarinic drugs (AMs). METHODS: The socioeconomic and medical parameters were studied in 2465 patients aged 18-60 years (1446 women (58.7%), 1019 men (41.3%); mean age was 52.1) taking AMs during the year. The study control was carried out by studying passport data, employers' income certificates, patients' ambulatory medical records, the use of OABq-SF and MOS SF-36 questionnaires, voiding diaries and uroflowmetry. RESULTS: The average time to reach the 30-day break in the AM administration was 177 days. During the 12-month follow up, 74.7% of patients discontinued their participation. In total, 35.9% of patients stated medical reasons for the refusal of AM treatment; in 31.9% of individuals in the group the deviation of objective health status markers from average sample values was established. Economic reasons for the refusal were given by 20.4% of patients; in 18.5% of individuals economic status markers were different from average sample values. In 24.1% of cases of refusal of treatment, patients indicated social and psychological reasons; objective social and psychological status markers were altered in 35.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients indicating economic and medical reasons for the refusal of AM treatment is statistically uniform with respect to the percentage of patients with objective disturbances of health and economic statuses. The percentage of patients indicating social and psychological factors as a reason for the refusal of treatment was significantly lower than the percentage of patients with altered social and psychological status markers. These results can be used in practical healthcare when predicting adherence to AM use.

3.
Ther Adv Urol ; 8(4): 239-248, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27928426

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this work was to study the factors affecting the stability of working patients in antimuscarinic (AM) drug treatment. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) is an average of between 8.2% and 16.0% of the population. UUI is a condition that adversely affects the health-related quality of life. The first-line therapy in managing UUI is AM treatment. METHODS: In 1006 patients between 18 and 60 years old (627 women, 379 men, mean age 69.4) who received AM treatment for one year, the possible demographic, socioeconomic and health factors influencing compliance were studied. Also, the functional state of the lower urinary tract (LUT) was studied in this randomized, prospective survey. The study instruments were the documents of employers, tax offices, outpatient records, OABq-SF (overactive bladder - short form) questionnaires, MOS SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study short form-36), voiding charts, and uroflowmetry data. RESULTS: The compliance to AM treatment within 6 months was retained in 49.5% patients; during the year, in 32.3% of patients. The average time for reaching the 30-day break in taking trospium was 194 days. In the course of the experiment it was revealed that compliance to AM treatment was significantly higher in patients taking solifenacin and trospium in high dosages (p ⩽ 0.01, p ⩽ 0.05), suffering from severe symptoms of urgency (p ⩽ 0.01), and having a low level of side effects (p ⩽ 0.01). A satisfactory level of compliance is characteristic of patients with a high level of monthly and annual income (p ⩽ 0.01, p ⩽ 0.01), a low percentage of expenses to AM (p ⩽ 0.05), and rarely changing employers (p ⩽ 0.05). In addition, the compliance to treatment is higher in older adults (p ⩽ 0.05), living in the urban district (p ⩽ 0.01), and working in educational (p ⩽ 0.05) and health (p ⩽ 0.01) institutions, having a high level of the indices of Social Functioning (p ⩽ 0.05), Role-Emotional (p ⩽ 0.05), and Mental Health (p ⩽ 0.01). CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, under the control of the objective functional state of LUT, the influence of various factors on the patients' stability in the treatment with AM drugs was revealed.

4.
Int Neurourol J ; 20(3): 240-249, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706009

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The prevalence of hyperactive-type lower urinary tract symptoms is 45.2%, with shares of overactive bladder (OAB) and urge incontinence (UI) symptoms of 10.7% and 8.2%, respectively. We investigated the possible impact of a wide range of social, economic, and medical factors on compliance with solifenacin treatment in the working population. METHODS: Social, economic, and medical factors as well as the Overactive Bladder questionnaire - the OAB-q Short Form (OAB-q SF), bladder diaries, and uroflowmetry of 1,038 people who were administered solifenacin for a year were gathered from employer documentation. RESULTS: Among the subjects, 32% maintained their compliance with solifenacin treatment throughout the year. Only 65% of the patients had compliance exceeding 80%, and 17% of patients had compliance of ≥50%, yet less than 80% were still taking solifenacin 12 months after the beginning of this experiment. Working people whose compliance level was, at least, 80% had reliably higher (P≤0.01) average age, annual salary, and treatment efficacy, and a greater treatment satisfaction level, as well as a lack of satisfaction with other antimuscarinic treatments and higher rate of urge UI diagnosis. The same cohort also featured a lower level (P≤0.01) of caffeine abuse and lower share of salary spent purchasing solifenacin. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that compliance with solifenacin treatment is associated with a number of significant medical, social, and economic factors. The medical factors included the type of urination disorder, severity of incontinence symptoms, presence of side effects, treatment efficacy and patients' satisfaction with it, and experience using other antimuscarinic treatments. Among the social and economic factors, those with the strongest correlation to compliance were patient age, employment in medicine and education, annual income level, percentage of solifenacin purchase expenditures, and caffeine abuse. Factors with a weaker, but still significant, association were gender, employment in the transportation industry, and monthly income level.

5.
Am J Mens Health ; 10(2): 157-63, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26186951

ABSTRACT

This research is aimed to study the possibility of management of severe symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) with solifenacin and trospium in patients who receive treatment with tamsulosin due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The 338 men more than 50 years old (average age 58.4 years) diagnosed with BPH and severe symptoms of OAB were enrolled in the study. Over three episodes of urinary incontinence per day (registration according to bladder diaries), INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE: over 19, OAB-V8 questionnaire score over 32, and urodynamic disorders diagnosed using cystometry and uroflowmetry were taken as a criterion of severe symptoms of OAB. Patients of the main group during 2 months received treatment with daily combination of solifenacin 5 mg and trospium 5 mg simultaneously with tamsulosin 0.4 mg. Patients of the control group were treated only with tamsulosin. First endpoint is a quantitative assessment of patients with BPH having severe symptoms of OAB. Second endpoint is a state of the patients' lower urinary tract after the treatment. In the main group, most of urodynamic indices normalized significantly. Number of episodes of incontinence reduced from middle level 3.4 (0.8) per day to 0.9 (0.7) per day. In the control group changes of urodynamic indices were not significant. Quantity of side effects did not exceed the level which is common for antimuscarinic monotherapy. Therefore, percentage of patients with severe symptoms of OAB is not less than 44% of all cases of prostatic hyperplasia accompanied by OAB symptoms. Combination of trospium and solifenacin in standard doses is an efficient and safe method of management of severe symptoms of OAB in the course of the treatment of with tamsulosin in patients more than 50 years of age.


Subject(s)
Benzilates/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Nortropanes/administration & dosage , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Solifenacin Succinate/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Hyperplasia/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tamsulosin , Treatment Outcome , Urodynamics/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...