Costs related to medical treatment for common cardiovascular risk factors.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of selected cardiovascular diseases, namely hypertension (HT), metabolic syndrome (MS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in the Slovak Republic. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study analyzes the data of 1,000 patients, randomly selected from NEMESYS database (10,300 patients). Average direct pharmacotherapeutic costs of hypertension per year were 257 Euros in men and 264 Euros in women. Costs of metabolic syndrome were 334 Euros in men and 321 Euros in women. Finally, the costs of diabetes mellitus were 392 Euros in men and 384 Euros in women. The most expensive pharmacotherapy was used in patients with a combination of all three diagnoses (HT+MS+DM), namely 452 Euros in men and 455 Euros in women. Indirect costs represent an even more serious financial burden. The highest indirect costs were in patients with diabetes mellitus, namely 5,227 Euros in men and 5,365 Euros in women. CONCLUSIONS: The study proved the assumption of increasing the direct pharmacotherapeutic costs in correlation with the increased severity of disease. The gender differences on the other hand, were smaller in patients with more serious conditions. The indirect costs represented the greatest financial burden, and were 13 to 17 times higher than the direct pharmacotherapeutic costs (Tab. 4, Ref. 17).

[Purtscher-like retinopathy--a rare complication of acute pancreatitis]. / Purtscher-like retinopatia--zriedkavá komplikácia akútnej pankreatitídy: kazuistika.

The article reports the case of a 27-year old woman hospitalised in the internal medicine ward for acute pancreatitis after eating fat food and drinking alcohol. In addition to acute pancreatitis, the patient complained of vision problems. The ophthalmologist detected bilateral occurrence of large whitish nidi located primarily around the optic disc, intraretinal hemorrhage and a massive retinal oedema in the central field and diagnosed Purtscher-like retinopathy. After a month of treatment of acute pancreatitis, the clinical picture improved, the patient's vision sharpness improved and the laboratory parametres returned to normal. The finding on the ocular fundus also improved. Even though similar cases are rare, more patients with acute pancreatitis should be checked for eventual vision disorders. Ocular fundus examination should be included in the set of tests performed for acute pancreatitis, similarly to the practice in arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus patients.

[The prevalence of abdominal obesity in Slovakia. The IDEA Slovakia study]. / Prevalencia abdominálnei obezity na Slovensku. Stúdia IDEA Slovakia.

Abdominal obesity represents an independent risk factor for subsequent severe cardiovascular events. It is one of the important diagnostic criteria for Metabolic Syndrome whose predictive value for severe cardiovascular events is similar to that of elevated LDL-cholesterol levels. The prevalence of abdominal obesity in the context of Metabolic Syndrome still has not been systematically monitored in Slovakia. The IDEA program evaluated a sample of 4183 patients in 103 centres in Slovakia. It has shown that only one in three adult inhabitants of Slovakia has a normal body weight. Almost every second inhabitant of Slovakia has intraabdominal obesity (by ATP III criteria). Obesity was recorded in every third woman (34.7 %) and in every fourth man (27.0 %). The prevalence of the principal risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia and diabetes mellitus) grew in proportion to the increase in waist circumference.

Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma. Is the secretory pattern decisive for the clinical manifestation?

Adrenal incidentalomas are becoming a major clinical problem, due to increasingly frequent radiological examinations. We present two cases of patients referred to our department with a finding of an unsuspected adrenal mass. Both of them were normotensive and without symptomatology typical for pheochromocytoma. In one patient we found 20-times higher levels of epinephrine and 3-times higher levels of dopamine in 24-h urine, in the second patient there were 8-times higher levels of epinephrine alone. Norepinephrine in urine, as well as values of all adrenal cortical hormones were normal. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in both cases by a 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. The patients underwent adrenalectomy, which was performed without complications. We conclude that levels of single catecholamines excreted are decisive for the clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma. Epinephrine producing pheochromocytoma is more often oligo- or asymptomatic. We stress the importance of a complete hormonal screening in every case of adrenal incidentaloma, with measuring levels of catecholamines and/or metanephrines.

Increased efficacy and tolerability with losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and therapy-related symptoms receiving two monotherapies.

The efficacy and tolerability of losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg and enalapril 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg were compared in a double-blind, randomized trial in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled and experiencing side effects on prior therapy. Patients with moderate or severe hypertension, currently treated with at least two single-agent drugs (excluding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) above 90 mm Hg, and at least one undesirable drug-related symptom were randomized to once-daily treatment with one of the combinations for 12 weeks. Losartan/HCTZ lowered sitting DBP from the prior therapy baseline by 13.7 mm Hg and sitting systolic blood pressure 19.3 mm Hg; similar reductions occurred with enalapril/HCTZ. Trough sitting DBP was reduced to normal levels (< 90 mm Hg) in 63% of patients switched to the losartan combination and in 58% of those treated with the enalapril combination. Each combination was associated with improved tolerability compared with prior therapy, although fewer patients reported each of 24 undesirable symptoms after 12 weeks of losartan/HCTZ. The improvement from prior therapy in the occurrence of cough was significantly greater with losartan/HCTZ (P = .005). Enalapril/HCTZ, but not losartan/HCTZ, increased serum uric acid levels at week 12. In conclusion, the combination of losartan 100 mg/HCTZ 25 mg offers a beneficial therapeutic option for patients with a history of moderate to severe hypertension whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled or who exhibit side effects while on two or more single-agent antihypertensive drugs. In this population, the switch from prior antihypertensive therapies to once daily losartan 100 mg/HCTZ 25 mg improves blood pressure control and reduces side effects.