Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human interferon-alpha 2a combined with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with recombinant human interferon (IFN)-alpha 2a in 10 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. 5-FU was administered as a continuous i.v. infusion, 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days during week 1. One s.c. injection of IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU, was administered during week 2. Beginning with week 3, a continuous i.v. infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days was administered in combination with IFN-alpha 2a, 9 x 10(6) IU s.c. three times per week. The combination of 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a was continued every other week until either 3 months after complete remission or tumor progression. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Granulocytopenia (two patients), leukopenia (one patient), thrombocytopenia (one patient), stomatitis (two patients), fatigue (one patient) and hand-foot syndrome (one patient) were the major (grade 3) toxic reactions encountered. Overall, one complete and six partial responses were noted. The results of the paired t-test showed no statistically significant differences between the means of the two treatments, 5-FU and 5-FU plus IFN-alpha 2a, with respect to the steady-state plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, total body clearance, or steady-state volume of distribution of 5-FU, or the serum concentration of IFN. We conclude that 5-FU and IFN-alpha 2a do not interact pharmacokinetically at the doses and schedules in the regimen studied.

The effect of orlistat, an inhibitor of dietary fat absorption, on the absorption of vitamins A and E in healthy volunteers.

An open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers (between 20 and 44 years of age) to assess the effect of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces dietary fat absorption and is being developed for weight control in obesity, on the absorption of vitamins A and E. Each participant received a single oral dose of 25,000 IU vitamin A followed 24 hours later by a single oral dose of 400 IU vitamin E on two separate occasions: during oral administration of 120 mg orlistat or placebo three times daily for 9 days. The two treatments were separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at specified times over 24 hours after each dose of vitamin A for determination of serum concentrations of retinol, and over a period of 5 days after each dose of vitamin E for determination of serum concentrations of alpha-tocopherol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Orlistat significantly reduced the absorption of vitamin E (approximately 43% according to maximum concentration and approximately 60% according to area under the concentration-time curve), but not that of vitamin A, at the dose levels studied. The results of this study will aid in the implementation of a vitamin supplementation strategy, should vitamin deficiency occur in patients undergoing orlistat therapy.

The effect of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

To assess the effect of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a third-party blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers. Each participant received single 30-mg oral doses of racemic warfarin sodium (Coumadin; DuPont Pharma, Wilmington, DE) administered on the eleventh day of treatment with 120 mg orlistat (treatment A) and placebo (treatment B) three times a day for 16 days; the two treatments were separated by a 3-week washout period. Serial blood samples were collected before and at appropriate intervals after each dose of warfarin to determine plasma concentrations of R-warfarin and S-warfarin and blood prothrombin time (PT) and plasma Factor VII concentration. In addition, serum concentrations of vitamin K1 and its epoxide and of osteocalcin and its undercarboxylated form were measured before breakfast on days -7, 1, 4, 6, and 10. Equivalent results between treatments with orlistat and placebo were found with regard to all pharmacokinetic parameters of R- and S-warfarin (except for time to maximum concentration of R-warfarin). Pharmacodynamic parameters of warfarin (PT and Factor VII) and vitamin K nutritional status parameters (ratios of vitamin K1 to vitamin K1 epoxide and undercarboxylated osteocalcin to osteocalcin) also were unaltered by orlistat. Orlistat administered at doses of 120 mg three times daily did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 30-mg oral dose of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

The effect of orlistat, an inhibitor of dietary fat absorption, on the pharmacokinetics of beta-carotene in healthy volunteers.

To assess the influence of orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, on the absorption of beta-carotene, an open-label, parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 48 healthy volunteers between the ages of 19 and 58 years. Each subject received a single oral dose of 0, 30, 60, or 120 mg beta-carotene (12 subjects per dose level) on the fourth day of treatment with orlistat (120 mg) or placebo 3 times a day for 6 days. The treatments were separated by a washout period of at least 5 weeks. Serial blood samples were collected before and at appropriate intervals after administration of beta-carotene to determine plasma concentrations of unchanged beta-carotene. Short-term (3 to 6 days) treatment with orlistat did not alter endogenous profiles of beta-carotene in plasma. When beta-carotene was given during orlistat treatment, its absorption was reduced by approximately one-third. This reduction was consistent for all three dose levels of beta-carotene studied; however, the results for the 30-mg dose level were subject to greater variability, particularly for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). It was concluded that two thirds of a supplemental dose of beta-carotene will be absorbed during orlistat treatment; this may be sufficient to achieve physiologic levels of beta-carotene with an appropriate dose of beta-carotene, should supplementation be needed in obese patients who have developed beta-carotene deficiency during therapy with orlistat.

The influence of reduced dietary fat absorption induced by orlistat on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

To assess the influence of an orlistat-induced reduction in dietary fat absorption on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, an open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers. Each subject received single 0.4-mg doses of digoxin (soft gelatin capsules) administered orally on the fourth day of orlistat (120 mg three times daily for 6 days) and placebo (three times daily for 6 days) treatment, separated by at least an 11-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected before and at appropriate intervals after each digoxin dose to determine plasma concentrations of unchanged digoxin. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of geometric least-squares means (for Cmax, AUC0-48, AUC0-t, and AUC) and for the difference of arithmetic least-squares means (for tmax and lambda z) indicate that the pharmacokinetics of digoxin was not altered by treatment with orlistat. This results suggests that a approximately 30% reduction in dietary fat absorption will not change the efficacy of digoxin in cardiac patients.

The influence of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyburide in healthy volunteers.

To assess the influence of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (the blood glucose-lowering effect) of glyburide, an open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was done in 12 healthy male volunteers. Each subject received single 5-mg oral doses of glyburide (Micronase; The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI) on the fifth day of treatment with placebo (treatment A) and 80-mg orlistat (treatment B) three times a day for 4 1/3 days; the two treatments were separated by a five-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected before and at appropriate intervals after each glyburide dose to determine plasma concentrations and blood glucose levels. Values of Cmax and AUC of glyburide showed an equality of the two treatments by the analysis of variance. There was an apparent correlation between blood glucose level and the logarithm of plasma glyburide concentration; this relationship appeared to not be altered when glyburide was administered with orlistat. In conclusion, orlistat administered at doses of 80-mg three times daily does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics and blood glucose-lowering effect of a single 5-mg oral dose of glyburide in healthy volunteers.

Influence of human serum albumin content in formulations on the bioequivalency of interferon alfa-2a given by subcutaneous injection in healthy male volunteers.

To determine the influence of human serum albumin (HSA) content in formulations on the bioequivalency of recombinant interferon alfa-2a, a double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received a single subcutaneous injection of 18 million IU of Roferon-A reconstituted with either the diluent containing 10 mg of HSA or the HSA-free diluent; final HSA contents in the 2 formulations were 15 mg and 5 mg, respectively. Administration of the 2 formulations resulted in similar 48-hour Roferon-A serum concentration-time profiles and comparable frequency and intensity of adverse events. The statistical analysis using the two one-sided tests procedure showed that both formulations were bioequivalent for pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, tmax, AUC48, and AUC. We conclude that a threefold change in HSA content in formulations does not alter the bioequivalency of Roferon-A.