Proband only exome sequencing in 403 Indian children with neurodevelopmental disorders: Diagnostic yield, utility and challenges in a resource-limited setting.

Whole exome sequencing is recommended as the first tier test for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) with trio being an ideal option for the detection of de novo variants. Cost constraints have led to adoption of sequential testing i.e. proband-only whole exome followed by targeted testing of parents. The reported diagnostic yield for proband exome approach ranges between 31 and 53%. Typically, these study designs have aptly incorporated targeted parental segregation before concluding a genetic diagnosis to be confirmed. The reported estimates however do not accurately reflect the yield of proband only standalone whole -exome, a question commonly posed to the referring clinician in self pay medical systems like India. To assess the utility of standalone proband exome (without follow up targeted parental testing), we retrospectively evaluated 403 cases of neurodevelopmental disorders referred for proband-only whole exome sequencing at Neuberg Centre for Genomic Medicine (NCGM), Ahmedabad during the period of January 2019 and December 2021. A diagnosis was considered confirmed only upon the detection of Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic variants in concordance with patient's phenotype as well as established inheritance pattern. Targeted parental/familial segregation analysis was recommended as a follow up test where applicable. The diagnostic yield of the proband-only standalone whole exome was 31.5%. Only 20 families submitted samples for follow up targeted testing, and a genetic diagnosis was confirmed in twelve cases increasing the yield to 34.5%. To understand factors leading to poor uptake of sequential parental testing, we focused on cases where an ultra-rare variant was detected in hitherto described de novo dominant neurodevelopmental disorder. A total of 40 novel variants in genes associated with de novo autosomal dominant disorders could not be reclassified as parental segregation was denied. Semi-structured telephonic interviews were conducted upon informed consent to comprehend reasons for denial. Major factors influencing decision making included lack of definitive cure in the detected disorders; especially when couples not planning further conception and financial constraints to fund further targeted testing. Our study thus depicts the utility and challenges of proband-only exome approach and highlights the need for larger studies to understand factors influencing decision making in sequential testing.

The diagnostic utility of exome-based carrier screening in families with a positive family history.

Identification of disease-causing variants in families with a history of a suspected recessive disorder is essential for appropriate counseling and reproductive decision making. The present case series depicts the utility of whole exome-based phenotypes-driven carrier analysis in 14 families with a positive family history. A phenotype-based analysis revealed a putative diagnostic yield of 71.4%. Proband sample, though insufficient, was available in only one family, which allowed the diagnosis to be confirmed. In the remaining nine families, despite the detection of heterozygous pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, only a putative diagnosis was possible due to incomplete proband phenotyping as well as nonavailability of proband samples. We describe the youngest known patient homozygous for a likely pathogenic variant in PPP1R21. He is currently asymptomatic at 7 days of life and has a simplified gyral pattern on neuroimaging. The case series, though small, captures the challenges in the diagnosis of genetic disorders in low to middle income countries with in-equitable health care access. It reinforces the significance of detailed phenotyping in the proband as well as the importance of DNA storage for a conclusive diagnosis. A recurring post-test counseling challenge was risk ascertainment and reproductive decision making in subsequent pregnancies if the detected pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants are co-inherited, in families with a putative diagnosis. When opted for, prenatal testing in such a scenario would be limited in its ability to comment on the fetal status with respect to the disorder in the proband.